33
submitted 1 week ago by dandelion to c/feminism@beehaw.org

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/50253898

The transportation department has unveiled a first crash test dummy in the US modeled specifically on female anatomy, a move officials say is meant to close decades of safety gaps in vehicle testing.

Sean Duffy, the US transportation secretary, unveiled the THOR-05F, an advanced female design for a crash-test dummy with upgraded technical specifications. According to the transportation department, the dummy will be incorporated into federal vehicle crash testing once a final rule is published.

Although men make up the majority of annual car-crash victims, women are more likely to die in collisions of comparable severity. Women are also 73% more likely than men to sustain serious injuries in a crash, according to studies. In addition, they face a higher risk of specific trauma, including pelvis and liver injuries.

36
submitted 1 week ago by dandelion to c/feminism@beehaw.org

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/50231347

Germany plans to treat the use of date rape drugs like the use of weapons in prosecutions as part of measures to ensure justice for survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault.

“We classify date rape drugs, which are increasingly used as a widespread tool in crimes, as weapons. This creates the basis for significantly stricter prosecutions,” Alexander Dobrindt, the interior minister, said on Friday. “We are committed to clear consequences and consistent enforcement. Women should feel safe and be able to move freely everywhere.”

Nearly 54,000 women and girls were the victims of sexual offences in Germany in 2024 – an increase of 2.1% on the previous year – of which nearly 36% were victims of rape and sexual assault.

415
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by dandelion to c/womensstuff@piefed.blahaj.zone

like, if I'm nice (as I would prefer to be), a man might get the wrong impression, but I'm also afraid to be rude or do anything to upset them so I have to be the right kind of nice or polite - it's a real double-bind, and something I don't experience with women

76
submitted 2 weeks ago by dandelion to c/womensstuff@piefed.blahaj.zone

my GladRags just came in the mail and my pad adhesive problems are now solved, thank you all so much! 🫶 🥰

(side note: the patterns are super cute, these pads are so soft, and I have found washing them by hand and letting them air-dry overnight much less of a chore than I expected)

73
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by dandelion to c/mtf

In this 2009 study, 50 trans women with penile-inversion vaginoplasties had their microbiome sampled and it was revealed that nearly all of them had a microflora similar to bacterial vaginosis in natal vaginas, making them more likely to have UTIs and resulting in malodorous discharge.

Bacterial vaginosis (BV), for those not familiar, is when a wide variety of diverse microbes grow in the vagina. A healthy natal vagina typically has a monoculture of Lactobacillus spp. which grow and excrete lactic acid, which acidifies the environment and prevents other microbes from being able to grow. When lactobacilli are unable to form a monoculture, the microbiome can diversify and problematic bacteria are able to grow, which can cause irritation, urinary tract infections (UTIs), and unpleasant odors.

Typical advice for a person with a natal vagina is to avoid douching and to allow the vagina to "self clean" - basically the vagina already creates the conditions that promote lactobacilli dominance, and in bad cases of BV, a course of antibiotics usually will clear it up.

The way this works in a natal vagina is that the cervix and the special kind of skin that lines the vagina both secrete glycogen (think of it as a kind of sugar) that feed the lactobacilli, and the estrogen also triggers the vaginal lining to acidify the environment, helping create conditions ideal for lactobacilli to grow in.

Unlike in a natal vagina, neo-vaginas are lined with scrotal skin or colon grafts, neither of which respond to estrogen the same way that natal vaginal skin lining does, and there is no cervix - so there is nothing that produces glycogen to feed the bacteria. There is also no regular production of mucus like the cervix creates which acts to regularly flush or clean-out the vagina, and the skin used to line the neo-vagina does not regularly cast off and replace itself like natal vaginal skin does.

So as you might imagine, my surgical team told me that I would never have a normal vaginal microbiome, and that for the rest of my life I will have to douche with vinegar every other day.

I continue to follow those instructions (I douche with a 1:1 solution of vinegar and water, every other day), especially because I still have bleeding and healing wounds from wound separation complications that happened (basically the dilator regularly rips the skin back open every time I dilate, and I don't want those wounds to become infected).

Meanwhile, I've began to explore ways to improve my microbiome.

First step: acidify.

Lactobacilli don't generally grow without a supportive, acidic environment to kill off other bacteria. Vinegar is great because it's acidic, but acetic acid (which is what vinegar is made up of) apparently doesn't help lactobacilli to grow, what they need is lactic acid.

My first attempt to help my microbiome was to find a lubricant that would have lactic acid and promote lactobacilli growth, and I found one!

Before I share what I found, I want to be clear this isn't an advertisement and I'm not suggesting you buy this product. In fact, by the end, I'll share why you shouldn't buy it.

But the only lubricant I found that has lactic acid and promotes a healthy microbiome is from Good Clean Love, they have several products but any of the water-based lubricants or the "moisturizing gel" product would work (avoid all silicone lubes).

OK, great - so I found a way to acidify my vagina!

Except, when I tested my discharge even when just using Good Clean Love's lube, I consistently had a pH of around 5.0, which is too basic ... Additionally, the cost of the lube was too much for how much I needed to use to dilate - it's not a workable solution financially.

So I thought I could make my own! Turns out, you can buy medical and food grade lactic acid online. My pump bottles of Slippery Stuff lube would inevitably have some leftovers that I collected in jars and awkwardly tried to use up, so I already had a "waste" source of base lube to test with.

Next step: feed.

So I could acidify the environment, but it didn't seem like it was promoting lactobacilli enough, and I put together that the Good Clean Lube didn't have any kind of fuel for the lactobacilli to eat, basically nothing was replacing the glycogen that the cervix was releasing in natal vaginas (and that makes sense, the makers of Good Clean Lube probably assume their customers are using the lube with a natal vagina providing its own glycogen, so for a natal vagina acidifying was probably sufficient).

So I did a little research on what kinds of fuel lactobacilli can eat, and I kept finding that FOS (fructooligosaccharide) powder is used as a prebiotic to promote lactobacilli growth. So for my first batch, I combined Slippery Stuff lube with 1% lactic acid (by weight) and 1% FOS powder, and started using it as a lubricant when dilating, and using a lube syringe to insert some of the stuff into my vagina on the nights I wasn't douching. And again, I found my pH wasn't dropping, still tested around 5.0.

For context, FOS is a carbohydrate - and it turns out lactobacilli can sort of feed on it it through anaerobic fermentation, but ... that is usually happening in the digestive tract, not in the vaginal canal (FOS powder is a common prebiotic ingredient in oral probiotic pills, and is used similarly to inulin prebiotics) - and, it's not clear it promotes the kind of metabolism and growth the way glycogen does.

So I wondered what would make a better substitute for glycogen? Well, duh - glucose, sugar. But how much sugar should be added to the lube, it would need to be the right amount so it doesn't promote the wrong bacteria or, god forbid, fungi.

So it turns out sugar has about the same caloric value per gram as glycogen, so I reasoned a 1:1 substitute would be sufficient, and samples of genital fluids of natal vaginas show that glycogen made up 3% of the fluid, so that's a good starting place.

Another problem I ran into was the way the lactic acid turned my Slippery Stuff base lubricant from a stretchy lube gel into a very runny liquid, basically unusable as a lubricant and even worse, it would run out of me when I tried to insert it to feed lactobacilli in the canal overnight - I needed something like a gel that would stay in place and be able to feed the lactobacilli overnight. I noticed Good Clean Love uses agar agar and aloe in their water-based lubricants, so I tried the same.

For my second batch, I used 3% powdered sugar, 1% lactic acid, 0.5% agar agar powder, and 0.5% FOS (just in case it might still be helpful), and this time I had to boil the solution and allow it to set into a gel.

The 0.5% was maybe too firm of a gel, but I was able to break it up enough to suck it into a lube syringe and deposit it into the canal with the syringe.

For clarity, both batches with 1% lactic acid tested around a pH of 3.0.

Once a month or so, I had been inserting a vaginal suppository which contains lactobacilli, and once I had my second batch, on a night between douching, I inserting the vaginal suppository, and then deposited some of my second batch gel.

The next morning, eureka - my discharge tested at a pH of 4.0, and smelled heavenly - sweet and sour, a little bit like a kind of yogurt or sourdough.

I think it worked, I found a way to promote lactobacilli in my vagina!

Next steps: once healed and infecting wounds is no longer a concern, I can figure out how frequently I would need to feed the lactobacilli so they remain dominant (every other day? twice a week?), and also how to occasionally douche without nuking the microbiome, perhaps with a lactic acid solution rather than a vinegar solution?

(It would also be nice to eventually find a more objective way to test my microbiome than just pH and smell; unfortunately the study that examined the microbiome of trans women used methods like gene sequencing, though I might be able to try their method of gram staining and then examining under a 1000x microscope. I'm not sure if swabs being cultured on agar dishes would be a reasonable method of examining the microbiome, but that's at least within the realm of possibility compared to gene sequencing.)

Douching would still be necessary because as mentioned there is no "self-cleaning" process happening naturally, old lube and stuff will collect without occasionally irrigating the canal.

But at least I have a decent lead on how to avoid BV!

Disclaimer: Just to be clear, I'm doing weird stuff and taking risks I wouldn't recommend others take - none of this is medical advice, I have no medical training, and probably a lot of this is very stupid and potentially risky.

I wanted to share in case anyone else found it interesting (or better, if they know more than me and can provide critique), and in case others have been tinkering with their microbiome as well and may have notes.

EDIT: It should also be noted that a study published in 2014 found 75% of 63 trans women they swabbed were found to have lactobacilli in their microbiome, and their microbiomes were comparable to those of postmenopausal cis women.

Also, the Good Clean Love vaginal suppository I linked to contains pseudo-science homeopathic ingredients which is cause for some concern, and I would like a better vaginal suppository that just has the bacteria and none of the homeopathic ingredients.

And it should also be mentioned that I also take a daily, oral probiotic called Soaking Wet (I chose that one because it has Lactobacillus crispatus in particular). My surgical team indicated taking these oral probiotics will not help with my vaginal microbiome (likely for the reasons above on why my vaginal microbiome will never be like a natal one), but they did recommend Align probiotics in particular to help recover from surgery (you take a lot of antibiotics in the first few weeks post-op, so they recommended switching to Align probiotics once I was finished with my antibiotics) - that was for my gut microbiome, not for the vaginal microbiome. Needless to say, I haven't noticed any dramatic improvement from taking the Soaking Wet probiotic - though it does also contain vitamin D, vitamin E, and zinc, which is probably helpful for some people.

90
I'll whoop your rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by dandelion to c/onehundredninetysix

why would you put a sticker right where your windshield wipers go?

(or more importantly, why would you put that sticker on your car at all?)

25
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by dandelion to c/womensstuff@piefed.blahaj.zone

when I wear pads, the adhesive usually balls up, ends up on the panties which then get transferred to my thighs and hands, and then it makes a mess everywhere - it gets smeared on countertops, onto toilet seats, etc. and is a pain to clean up ...

any suggestions on how to avoid the adhesive balling up or this problem in general? it seems to be a problem with any brand I use, they all have adhesives to keep the pad in place in the panties 🤷‍♀️

made this post NSFW just in case anyone is squeamish about talk of pads and so on 😅

edit:

here's a photo of what I'm talking about:

click to expand and see photo

29
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by dandelion to c/vegan@slrpnk.net

Was looking into this because of that recent Paul McCartney article that was shared, and wanted to share what I found:

Here's a good breakdown of differences between vegan & vegetarian diets in terms of climate impact: https://www.nature.com/articles/s43016-023-00795-w

Emissions:

  • Vegan:............. CO2: 2.16, CH4: 04.39, N2O: 0.71
  • Vegetarian:........ CO2: 3.33, CH4: 20.21, N2O: 0.98
  • medium meat-eaters: CO2: 5.34, CH4: 40.88, N20: 1.73
  • high meat-eaters:.. CO2: 7.28, CH4: 65.40, N2O: 2.62

So vegans have 30% of the emissions as high-meat-eaters, and the differences between vegans and vegetarians are significant with regards to their emissions, particularly methane emissions due to the significantly higher consumption of cheese by vegetarians.

(EDIT: it has been suggested it's worth clarifying that vegan diet having 30% CO2 emissions means that there was a 70% reduction in CO2 emissions, and that methane emissions were reduced by 93% going from high-meat to vegan.)

Vegetarians ate significantly more cheese (30 g / day) than even meat-eaters (19 g / day), despite eating less dairy overall otherwise.

Also should be noted that there is a big gap between biodiversity impact between vegans and vegetarians, with vegetarian diets causing nearly double the number of species extinctions per day than vegan diets.

I was surprised that water use was so similar between vegans and vegetarians considering how much cheese vegetarians eat.

I still would recommend a vegetarian diet to meat eaters, as it's still a massive improvement (and in my experience, it's easier to become vegan once vegetarian), just thought it was interesting to actually quantify differences between veganism and vegetarianism in terms of climate impact.

48
submitted 3 weeks ago by dandelion to c/lgbtq_plus

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/34079011

The Supreme Court on Thursday allowed President Donald Trump’s administration to enforce a policy blocking transgender and nonbinary people from choosing passport sex markers that align with their gender identity.

In a brief, unsigned order, the court said the policy doesn’t appear to discriminate against transgender people. “Displaying passport holders’ sex at birth no more offends equal protection principles than displaying their country of birth,” it said. “In both cases, the Government is merely attesting to a historical fact without subjecting anyone to differential treatment.”

Sex markers began appearing on passports in the mid-1970s and the federal government started allowing them to be changed with medical documentation in the early 1990s, the plaintiffs said in court documents. A 2021 change under President Joe Biden, a Democrat, removed documentation requirements and allowed nonbinary people to choose an X gender marker after years of litigation.

A judge blocked the Trump administration policy in June after a lawsuit from nonbinary and transgender people, some of whom said they were afraid to submit applications. An appeals court left the judge’s order in place.

36
submitted 3 weeks ago by dandelion to c/lgbtq_plus@beehaw.org

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/34079011

The Supreme Court on Thursday allowed President Donald Trump’s administration to enforce a policy blocking transgender and nonbinary people from choosing passport sex markers that align with their gender identity.

In a brief, unsigned order, the court said the policy doesn’t appear to discriminate against transgender people. “Displaying passport holders’ sex at birth no more offends equal protection principles than displaying their country of birth,” it said. “In both cases, the Government is merely attesting to a historical fact without subjecting anyone to differential treatment.”

Sex markers began appearing on passports in the mid-1970s and the federal government started allowing them to be changed with medical documentation in the early 1990s, the plaintiffs said in court documents. A 2021 change under President Joe Biden, a Democrat, removed documentation requirements and allowed nonbinary people to choose an X gender marker after years of litigation.

A judge blocked the Trump administration policy in June after a lawsuit from nonbinary and transgender people, some of whom said they were afraid to submit applications. An appeals court left the judge’s order in place.

24
submitted 3 weeks ago by dandelion to c/transgender

The Supreme Court on Thursday allowed President Donald Trump’s administration to enforce a policy blocking transgender and nonbinary people from choosing passport sex markers that align with their gender identity.

In a brief, unsigned order, the court said the policy doesn’t appear to discriminate against transgender people. “Displaying passport holders’ sex at birth no more offends equal protection principles than displaying their country of birth,” it said. “In both cases, the Government is merely attesting to a historical fact without subjecting anyone to differential treatment.”

Sex markers began appearing on passports in the mid-1970s and the federal government started allowing them to be changed with medical documentation in the early 1990s, the plaintiffs said in court documents. A 2021 change under President Joe Biden, a Democrat, removed documentation requirements and allowed nonbinary people to choose an X gender marker after years of litigation.

A judge blocked the Trump administration policy in June after a lawsuit from nonbinary and transgender people, some of whom said they were afraid to submit applications. An appeals court left the judge’s order in place.

35
submitted 3 weeks ago by dandelion to c/feminism@beehaw.org

A video of the incident on Tuesday shows a visibly drunk man trying to kiss the president on the neck and embrace her from behind, as she removes his hands and turns to face him, before a government official steps in and places himself between them.

“This is something I experienced as a woman, but it is something that all women in our country experience,” said Sheinbaum in her daily press conference. “If I do not file a complaint, where does that leave all Mexican women? If they do this to the president, what happens to all the other women in the country?”

[-] dandelion 102 points 2 months ago

As she waits for a decision in the Ter Apel asylum seekers’ center in the Netherlands, Arc is pessimistic about her chances. She says Dutch government employees have told her they don’t want to “p*** off” the U.S. by branding it an unsafe country.

She expects to be deported, and when that happens, she fears that the Trump administration will find some pretext to imprison her with men.

“I don’t want to be the person that makes the Netherlands decide it’s not safe for trans people [in the U.S.], and change their policy,” she says. “But I suspect that one of us would have to get killed for that to change.

“Which one of us will get to be that person?”

[-] dandelion 133 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The replies in this thread are disturbing, giving me a sense that Lemmy has a misogyny problem; maybe I was naïve, but I expected outrage about 4chan doxxing women trying to protect one another, instead I see lots of revenge enjoyment as if being doxxed on 4chan is justice for ... warning one another about dangerous men they encounter when dating?

The inability to empathize and take seriously the threats posed to women or to understand their motivation to protect one another is alarming.

There is no good faith extended, but also no evidence presented that instead of safety the app was just for gossip, it's just taken as assumed that women are wrong for using Tea and they all deserve to be doxxed.

[-] dandelion 216 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Pascal has been a vocal ally of the transgender community, frequently using his platform to advocate for trans rights. At the UK premiere of “Thunderbolts,” he wore a shirt reading "Protect the Dolls," a term of endearment for transgenderism.

I wonder if the author of the article realizes "transgenderism" is a right-wing, anti-trans term?

EDIT: ah, it looks like the author of that blog is probably anti-trans and holds other right-wing views: https://old.reddit.com/r/blankies/comments/rcczql/can_someone_give_me_context_for_the_film_blog/

[-] dandelion 101 points 7 months ago

wow, that's really out there for being bee movie erotica

[-] dandelion 93 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

https://www.engadget.com/cybersecurity/4chan-the-internets-most-infamous-forum-is-down-following-an-alleged-hack-142516392.html

According to screenshots shared on Imgur, it appears a hacker gained shell access to 4chan's hosting server. They then went on to post images of the site's phpmyadmin page, and appear to have doxed the entire moderation team alongside many of the site's registered users. While it seems some users took steps to protect their identities, many appear to have used their primary email address to register for the forum, with .edu and even .gov addresses reportedly appearing in the list leaked emails.

It's unclear what this means for the future of 4chan, but some social media and Reddit users are speculating this could be the end of the internet's most infamous forum. In addition to doxing much of 4chan's userbase, the hacker also appears to have leaked the site's source code, revealing security holes that have existed since around the time Hiroyuki Nishimura bought the forum from creator Christoper Poole. It may take months to rebuild a more secure version of 4chan.

If this is the end of 4chan, it would be the most significant de-platforming of extreme right-wing internet users since Kiwi Farms temporarily went down in 2022.

[-] dandelion 100 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Read the actual Watchlist entry instead of Time magazine: https://monitor.civicus.org/watchlist-march-2025/

The United States of America (USA) has been added to our Watchlist as the country faces increasing undue restrictions on civic freedoms under President Donald Trump’s second term. Gross abuses of executive power raise serious concerns over the freedoms of peaceful assembly, expression and association.

Following his inauguration on 20 January 2025, Donald Trump has issued at least 125 executive orders, dismantling federal policies with profound implications for human rights and the rule of law. Some of these orders have eliminated federal diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programmes, falsely framing them as discriminatory, and have introduced measures targeting undocumented migrants and transgender and non-conforming people.

Since mid-January, many civil society organisations, both in the US and abroad, have been forced to terminate or scale back essential human rights and humanitarian programmes due to growing uncertainty caused by the arbitrary suspension of foreign aid and a broad freeze on federal funding. The lack of clear guidelines has sparked legal challenges at the national level.

The administration has taken steps to dismantle the US Agency for International Development (USAID), a decades-old institution, and laid off thousands of its employees. It has also withdrawn from the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the UN Human Rights Council, exited the Paris Climate Agreement, rejected the Agenda 2030 and the Sustainable Development Goals, and announced sanctions on the International Criminal Court (ICC), targeting its personnel as well as individuals and entities that cooperate with it. These actions could further undermine global efforts for climate justice, human rights, and civic freedoms.

These measures come amid a broader potential curb on the freedom of association. On 21 November 2024, the US House of Representatives passed a bill allowing the Treasury Department to revoke the tax-exempt status of non-profits it deems to be supporting terrorism, without due process guarantees. This would grant the executive branch sweeping authority to financially cripple civil society organisations based on broad and vague criteria.

The sustained onslaught on peaceful pro-Palestine solidarity at university campuses has seen students and faculty members increasingly subjected to harsh sanctions without justification. On 30 January 2025, President Donald Trump, signed an executive order purportedly aimed at combating antisemitism, which calls for the cancellation of visas and the deportation of non-citizen college students and others who have participated in pro-Palestinian protests. On the same day, reports alleged that a far-right group was compiling a list of pro-Palestine protesters for potential deportation.

Authorities have also targeted climate justice activists protesting the Mountain Valley Pipeline project in Virginia and financial institutions supporting fossil fuel expansion. Another concern is the growing role of private corporations in suppressing environmental activism. Two key developments exemplify this: the USD 300 million lawsuit against Greenpeace by the company behind the Dakota Access Pipeline; and research exposing the fossil fuel industry’s role in driving the proliferation of anti-protest laws.

The first months of 2025 have seen an alarming legislative push in multiple states, further threatening restrictions on the freedom of peaceful assembly. At least 12 state-level bills introduced between January and February 2025 would impose new restrictions on protests. Notably, bills in Indiana (SB 286), Iowa (HF 25), Missouri (HB 601), New York (S 723), and North Dakota (HB 1240) seek to criminalise the use of masks during protests. They could also expose protesters to heightened surveillance technologies and intimidation tactics, as evidenced by the doxingattempts over the past year against pro-Palestine protesters.

Meanwhile, Minnesota’s new bill (SF 1363) introduces new civil and criminal liabilities for those supporting protesters who engage peacefully in demonstrations on a critical public service facility, pipelines or other utility property. These restrictions show a broader trend since 2017 of escalating constraints on protests and could trigger a new wave of repression against those expressing dissenting views.

There are also serious concerns about freedom of expression and access to information, particularly for journalists covering politically sensitive issues. On 11 February 2025, two journalists from the Associated Press (AP) were banned access to White House-related press briefings due to the agency’s editorial policy to continue to refer to the Gulf of Mexico by its internationally recognised denomination rather than the presidentially decreed “Gulf of America.” AP filed a lawsuit against administration officials, but a federal judge denied the agency’s request for the immediate restoration of full access to presidential events for its journalists, ruling that access to the president is at his discretion and not a constitutional right.

Moreover, on 25 February, the White House press secretary announced that the administration will decide which media outlets can access the presidential press pool. These recent decisions raised concerns about unprecedented restrictions on public access to independent reporting on government affairs.

[-] dandelion 102 points 11 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

If you're asking if gender determines how people interact, the answer is absolutely yes. There are so many ways this is true.

[-] dandelion 94 points 11 months ago
[-] dandelion 114 points 1 year ago

Meanwhile the kids where I am shout "Vote Trump" and have never heard the Hollywood Access tape because they were children when it came out. It's a mixed bag.

[-] dandelion 234 points 1 year ago

let's keep it that way, the right-wing should be unwelcome everywhere

[-] dandelion 183 points 1 year ago

FYI Texas has been marked as a "do not travel" state on Erin Reed's trans risk map: https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/final-pre-election-2024-anti-trans

view more: next ›

dandelion

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF