248
Passing Rule (sopuli.xyz)
submitted 4 hours ago by Gork@sopuli.xyz to c/onehundredninetysix
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 6 points 32 minutes ago

I don’t mind just nudging my cruise control down a tad when this happens behind a car, but there’s something claustrophobic about driving behind a box truck for a long period of time.

[-] flandish@lemmy.world 2 points 34 minutes ago

i mean. as long as you are passing, and not speeding, it’s not “camping in the passing lane.”

just because a dbag comes up behind you wanting to go 20 over the limit and you are not passing “fast enough” does not mean you are camping either.

[-] bob_lemon@feddit.org 3 points 14 minutes ago

Depends on the jurisdiction. In Germany, you must not overtake anyone unless you are "driving with significantly higher speed".

This is basically unenforced though.

[-] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 hour ago

"Oh shit, I'm being passed by a truck! Better speed up to match their pace."

[-] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 hours ago

Don't know what you're talking about

[-] RVGamer06@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 hours ago

is that a "69" on the train?

[-] froufox 5 points 1 hour ago

how can you see what's inside the car?

[-] RVGamer06@sh.itjust.works 1 points 35 minutes ago

i don't, but that on the outside looks like a 69 anyway

[-] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 22 minutes ago

That's how we do it here ;) our train rides are really good

[-] Megabazos@lemmy.zip 1 points 20 minutes ago

It's the Dutch trainlines (NS or Nederlandse Spoorwegen) logo! Blue logo consisting of two arrows in opposite ways, sort of spelling an N and an S, on a yellow background

[-] Major_Tsiom@fedia.io 32 points 3 hours ago

Ahhh, I've been caught doing this a few times. I would misjudge the speed differential and it would take way too long to pass the other guy. Trucks usually have governors on them and cruise control is set to max... Cars would back up behind me and I would be thinking "come on, man, let off the gas a little and let me by!" I always felt bad about it because I know what a piss off it is being caught behind that bullshit.

[-] isleepinahammock 5 points 1 hour ago

If you're barely able/willing to travel faster than the other truck, why pass in the first place? You're both traveling nearly the same speed. Just ride behind the other guy. The only time you need to pass is if you want to cruise substantially faster than the person you're passing.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

When I see this happening I try to leave enough space behind so the trucker feels like they can slow down safely, and most of them do.

[-] DudleyMason@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

The trucks are still much more likely to be doing something useful to society than the ecocidal narcissists they're pissing off by slowing down the zoom-zooms.

If this picture fills you with rage, you aren't mature enough to be in control of two tons of heavy machinery anyway.

[-] isleepinahammock 1 points 55 minutes ago

You don't need to defend asocial assholes steeling hours from society to save themselves seconds.

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 hours ago

I'm of the side that says just be patient, but I believe that mandated speed governors contribute to this issue. In Ontario where I'd seen this a lot, that is 105km/h, but it seems that they aren't calibrated well, or engine performance for loaded trucks going up hills means they can't pass even if they had been partway through it on the downhill. In Nova Scotia, I've been passed by large flatbed trucks that have no issue going 125km/h past me going 110.

[-] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 30 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

The red truck is passing, at 1km/h speed difference you shouldn't be waiting more than 30 seconds for it to clear. Patience.

Every one replying to me that it's technically three truck lengths needs to calm down. If you hate driving this much then there's better things to do with that energy. It's terrifying that I'm sharing the highway with some of y'all.

[-] isleepinahammock 5 points 57 minutes ago

You're poo-pooing the impatience of the car drivers but ignoring the impatience of the truck driver.

Why the hell is the truck passing another truck to begin with? You're talking a measly 1 km/hr difference! For a trip of 100 km, that measly 1 km/hr difference means the truck driver is passing another truck to save a measly 36 seconds. (And that's the ideal case, assuming the speed difference is maintained the whole time.) And by doing so they create a massive traffic jam that causes dozens of drivers to be delayed by minutes.

There's a reason many states ban trucks from passing other trucks. It's an extremely selfish and asshole thing to do. One truck driver saves 30 seconds or so on their trip. In exchange, dozens of drivers lose minutes. The truck driver is stealing an hour of time from the rest of society to give himself 30 seconds. You should not be defending such selfish bastards.

The math changes a bit if you assume a longer trip, but the conclusion won't. Inevitably the time the truck driver steals from others will be vastly more than the time they save. It's dangerous asocial behavior.

[-] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 2 points 34 minutes ago

You don't know why one truck decided to pass another one. Could be a safety issue. There's no way for you to know for sure. It's OK though, you'll still get to your destination within a minute of when you would have if they hadn't chosen to overtake. And everything will be fine.

[-] isleepinahammock 2 points 21 minutes ago

You're grasping at straws. What safety issue would cause one truck to need to pass another? If you're worried about something falling off the truck in front of you, the correct response is to slow down and increase your following distance, not to slowly pass the other truck while creating a massive traffic hazard.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 6 minutes ago

If it's a "safety issue," it's definitely not happening at a 1 MPH speed differential. C'mon, now.

[-] arctanthrope@lemmy.world 49 points 4 hours ago

for a truck to pass another truck, it has to be in the left lane for at least 3 truck-lengths, which is roughly 65 meters. 1kph is 10m/36s, so 65m is 36s×6.5 = 3.9minutes

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 18 points 3 hours ago
[-] isleepinahammock 4 points 1 hour ago

Tell that to the truck driver. 1 km/hr faster equates to just 36 seconds saved on a 100 km trip. And to do that they cause a massive traffic jam that greatly increases the chance of accidents and delays dozens of people for several minutes each.

Why are you OK haughtily telling dozens of drivers "patience," while ignoring the massive asocial asshole causing a huge disruption from an even greater level of impatience?

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 1 points 57 minutes ago

Because I have witnessed car accidents with fatalities. Yes, the trucker is an asshole. Have patience. Get home safe.

[-] isleepinahammock 4 points 51 minutes ago

Think of where you are right now. You are not the passenger of a vehicle telling a driver to have patience. We're specifically discussing the situation from an outside perspective. "Have patience" is useful advice for someone actively driving a car stuck behind passing trucks. It comes across as condescending when you bring it into a discussion about whether passing truck drivers are in the wrong or not.

[-] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 22 points 4 hours ago

The rounding caused by the 2 digit speed labels hide the actual problem. Blue is actually going 80.45 km/h and red is going 80.55 km/h.

[-] plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works 14 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

You forget the other vehicle is also moving and is really long, it takes almost 3 minutes for one to pass the other and a distance of over 2000m. And just bumper to bumper, that doesn’t include safe lane changing distances either.

If you’re talking two cars, than yes.

[-] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Yeah but the red truck isnt letting me burn up all my gas. Its also making me wear out my break pads because i need to stay exactly 6 feet behind it until it finally moves over. At least I get a free lunch of rocks that my cars windshield gets to eat as I sit behind it.

[-] WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 4 points 4 hours ago

They give you a full 6 ft of breathing room there? Must be a really nice place to live.

[-] makeshift0546@lemmy.today 4 points 3 hours ago

Insufferable nerd shit. The truck driver can fuck off are pass when appropriate.

[-] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 5 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

People getting so bent out of shape seeing two trucks next to each other that they can't even type straight.

[-] isleepinahammock 1 points 54 minutes ago

You just have an axe to grind against cars in general. You're not objective enough to have a useful opinion here.

[-] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 1 points 44 minutes ago* (last edited 28 minutes ago)

I own two cars that I like very much. They are not necessary for my opinion to be useful. Ad hominem is for babies. Are you a baby?

[-] isleepinahammock 1 points 19 minutes ago* (last edited 18 minutes ago)

Your opinions clearly indicate you have axe to grind against private vehicle ownership. Fair enough. But that is clouding your opinions. Half your posts are from the "Fuck Cars" community. You're looking for any thin, ridiculous, and rare excuse to justify the truck driver creating a massive road hazard endangering dozens of innocent people.

[-] makeshift0546@lemmy.today 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Nah, they are assholes. They'll get the slow down over the next half mile once I'm in front. Absolute ADHD contrariness fighting for these guys shitty at their jobs age not giving a fuck.

[-] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 hours ago

Drive less.

[-] markz@suppo.fi 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

More if you include lane changes. Then there's the line of other cars that had to slow down as well.

[-] dsilverz@catodon.rocks 5 points 2 hours ago

At least in Brazil, the speed limit is different for cars/motorbikes and for trucks/buses, often it's a 3:2 ratio.

For example, a highway with a maximum speed of 130 km/h (very rare, max speed is often 120km/h) would have a maximum speed of 85 km/h for trucks and buses. This is often informed by the same vertical sign, e.g.:

"Veículos leves
120
Veículos pesados
80"

(translation: "lightweight vehicles: 120km/h / heavy vehicles: 80km/h)

If a truck is traveling at 100km/h in a highway whose speed limit (for cars and motorbikes) is 120km/h, the truck is committing a traffic violation.

Unfortunately, this happens a lot, with trucks often tail-following (is this the correct English terminology? I don't remember) and threatening to run over a smaller vehicle which is trying to follow the laws and is traveling within the speed limits. People think "speed limit" means "required speed".

!onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone

[-] Derpenheim@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 hours ago

To answer the question you posed in your comment, the common term in English for a car following extremely close to another car is usually "tailgating". This refers to the "tail gate" that is on a the beds of flat bed trucks. So if you are following very close, you are nearly touching the tailgate.

[-] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 hours ago

It makes sense from one perspective (larger vehicle more mass more momentum) but considering that the impact of a 30kph collision is not negligible, and moreover that it will indisputably cause traffic to bunch up, is it helping or hindering safety?

[-] dsilverz@catodon.rocks 1 points 1 hour ago

Well, we do have countless accidents involving trucks on a daily basis, and those accidents often do cause the traffic to bunch up. One of the highways I'm somewhat used to drive through, "Rodovia Fernão Dias" (MG-460), is very famous for accidents in this regard. The accidents frequently involve retreaded tires ("pneu remolde") popping off the truck's wheels, and the truck is often traveling way beyond 80km/h (if they were traveling below 80km/h, maybe the truck would be slightly more controllable when such a thing happened I guess)...

In practice, the speed limit does nothing (except in cases they're caught by a speed camera, but people deliberately de-accelerate when getting close to a speed camera before speeding up again). If people were to respect the speed limits all the times, especially the truckers, maybe, just maybe, accidents would be less frequent. The ones hindering safety are often the truckers, however, I don't really blame them; the transportation companies they're working to often push surreal demands unto them (e.g. "you must take this cargo from Santos to Belo Horizonte in 12 hours", a 670km trip that'd take a car 10h non-stop, depending on the conditions of Rodoanel and Fernão Dias); they often use stimulant drugs ("rebite") to keep awake during insane days-long trips, and sometimes you can spot a truck zig-zagging and veering off to the roadside because the trucker fell asleep.

!onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone

[-] Kyle_The_G@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago

This is my new pet peave, I hope this becomes illegal one day. It backs traffic up like crazy.

[-] anton 7 points 3 hours ago

It is in Germany. Here overtaking may not take longer than 45s, so a truck can't do it unless the other one is driving 10 km/h below the speed limit.
If they get caught they are 1/8 of their way to a suspended license (requiring a 6 month wait and a psychological review and the normal exam to reacquire) .

[-] vorpuni@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 8 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

In a lot of countries it is illegal.

France:

  • vehicles above 3.5 tons longer than 7m: 50 metres distance minimum outside towns if cruising at the same speed (Code de la route R412-12 II)
  • it's illegal to attempt overtaking if it would impede the flow of traffic and the relative speeds do not allow for overtaking within a sufficiently short time (Code de la route R414-4 II)
  • a lot of busy roads have a sign forbidding overtaking for heavy vehicles, sometimes with specific times listed.

None of it is enforced so you should always expect to be cut off.

Also of note: whenever there are random checks of trucks by police they find around 50% in violation of important regulations like rest times and the administrative situation of a work vehicle. They willfully avoid checking too much because it would mean the means of transport for 85% of freight suddenly becomes way more expensive.

[-] lime@feddit.nu 6 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

i got to witness this with two double-trailer log carriers once, they were jockeying for position at 90km/h while i was trying to get past. now this was my first time in the company tesla model 3 (this was in 2017) and i just wanted to get past so i waited for an opening and floored it. after i had cleared them i looked down at the speedometer and i was doing 170. it didn't feel any different to doing 90. super weird experience considering i'd managed to make myself car sick a few minutes earlier when accelerating from 40 to 100 on the onramp.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

People get car sick in EVs more because there’s no audible cue when the car is accelerating, though exposure can train their brains enough to prevent it.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2026
248 points (100.0% liked)

196

6686 readers
1846 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS