it honestly depends on if a 6'1" girl would tower over you. I'd have to find another gay princess gf in that case

omg, it's Basket and Biscuit!

this sounds achievable ;3

tower over an in awe catgirl, or be towarded over by a tall girl? :33

Probably not, as chocolate has too low a melting point to be as lethal

So true bestie!!!!

only if you donate the gold ;3

Nah, I'd use it if I lost an arm. Extra prosthetics like blade legs are cool because they provide unique functionality. Making the best of losing your natural limb.

If violence is ok towards poor people employed by a military but the not ones hiring them, then maybe that's why people feel so comfortable hiring people to kill other people. I'm not big on punishing people who will never harm others again, but those that are currently or will likely cause harm should be fair game. I consider the person who gives the orders more culpable as the person who pulls the trigger, so killing a leader is better than killing their human tools.

As far as humanely goes, it's a mutual agreement that requires reasonable expectation of reciprocation. In a world where these laws are virtually never enforced, the best we can do is do onto others what they do onto you. The individuals who knowingly work to kill innocent people need to be stopped with any means necessary.

Things like killing innocents of their tribe are never justified, but the people actively working to kill have enabled PVP. To not view it as such is to give up resistance in any meaningful form. The only reason one should not kill active war criminals is if there is no reasonable chance of success.

idk if assassination is a warcrime when killing foot soldiers is acceptable.

I love how this dog is always comically wrong now.

As funny as the would be, it probably isn't true, as the official suspended persons list isn't even visible anymore.