576
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 78 points 2 months ago

You're an electrified hunk of fat piloting a meat-covered skeleton riding on a damp rock that's hurling through space and time.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 37 points 2 months ago

It's actually a lump of lava with a thin crust. Any time the crust breaks we have a very bad time.

[-] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 months ago
[-] ignotum@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago

The core is metal, the outer shell is hard rock, i would assume what's inbetween is a mix of pop and smooth jazz maybe?

[-] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 months ago
[-] abfarid@startrek.website 6 points 2 months ago

Obligatory "um, akhtually, it's magma".

[-] kozy138@lemm.ee 12 points 2 months ago

It's weird that we, as people, think that our being or self ends at our skin. And we're just a consciousness controlling a meat cube.

What about all the bacteria living on and inside of us? People would die without their microflora.

What about our subconscious/unconscious doings/thoughts? Are we in control of them? Or are they in control of us? Could consciousness be an illusion? One created by our senses' interpretation of external stimuli.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Be fair. You are an abstraction layer; a subsystem running on that electrified hunk of fat. There's plenty of stuff that evolution has delegated as non-conscious functions of the fatlump.

[-] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 months ago

So you're saying humanity is a mecha space opera?

[-] SkidFace@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

“At thе end of the day, your brain is just a meat computеr in a bone cockpit piloting a skin robot You think the world makes sense? Nothing makes sense! So you might as well make nonsense!”

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dankm@lemmy.ca 47 points 2 months ago

A CPU is just a rock we hit with magic lightning...

[-] rockerface@lemm.ee 35 points 2 months ago
[-] dankm@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago

Well yes, it's the lightning that makes the inscription.

[-] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 23 points 2 months ago

Light makes the inscription, lightning runs through it.

[-] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Light, gas, CVD and a dozen other processes, depending on the application, make the inscription.

[-] rockerface@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago

Username checks out

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 41 points 2 months ago

I never understood this weird hangup, it's like people struggling to reconcile free will with deterministic actions to a being outside normal time. Of course you'll make the same choices if you rewound time and changed nothing... You're the same, the universe is the same down to the last particle - how does that conflict with the idea of agency?

Consciousness is an emergent property. One neuron is complex, but 1000 can do things one could never do alone. Why is it so surprising that billions, arranged in complex self organizing structures, would give rise to something more than the sum of its parts?

Maybe there's a quantum aspect to it, maybe there's not... It seems like it's all based in this idea humans are so extra special that surely there must be special laws of the universe just for us

[-] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 months ago

Maybe there's a quantum aspect to it, maybe there's not...

I see what you did there, intentionally or not.

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 8 points 2 months ago

Heh. It was unintentional, next time it won't be

[-] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

To be honest the thing that confuses me is that I am conscious. That’s weird, how am I aware, there is no explanation of this. Assuming we pretty much understand all physics and science and there isn’t anything surprising around the corner. Consciousness has to be a physical thing, a computation. But that’s weird as hell too? What rule of the universe governs whether or not something is aware. A brain could do everything it does now without being really aware just pretending. And if that’s true does that mean it’s just the flow of information that can become conscious? Could anything become conscious? If I made a marble Rube Goldberg machine complicated it enough and doing the right calculations could it be conscious?? It feels wrong it feels like we are missing something

[-] zeca@lemmy.eco.br 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

This is exactly what puzzles me. Or at least you seem to be talking about what puzzles me. The problem is that when I mention this to others, most missunderstand what I mean by "being aware" or "conscious", and im not sure its possible to refer to this phenomena in a much better way. But that is exactly the argument i usually make, that an automata could behave exactly like me, following the supposed physical laws, but without being aware, or having any sensation, without seeing the images, hearing the sounds, only processing sensorial data. Processing sensorial data isnt the same as feeling/hearing/seeing it.

[-] tomalley8342@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I believe the academic label for your concern is the mind-body problem, or the hard problem of consciousness which specifically questions the gap in explanation between the physical process and the subjective experience. Going against the grain of the OP picture, this is definitely still firmly within the realms of philosophy, not at all a settled science.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Yep. This was the issue people took with Chomsky's approach to language, basically the same sentiment. Humans are "special" in some way. It underlines the basis of almost all cognitive, neuroscience, and language research for decades.

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 9 points 2 months ago

It's crazy to me how much this holds us back, and the amount of cognitive dissonance involved

Take pets. We look at them acting shifty around the sock they know they aren't allowed to play with, and say "she's thinking about it". We avoid words like "walk" because they've understood one of the meanings of it. And usually not just the meaning, but the difference between tone and context - most won't react the same to "should we take her for a walk" and "is he able to walk". My mom's dog knew all of our names, and the difference between "soon", "tomorrow", and "the day after tomorrow" - she would watch the door all day on the right day

And yet, most people will share all of these observations and turn around to dismiss it as "she's just a dog". For them it's just association and behavioral conditioning, but the same things are different for humans because we're extra special. Clearly her acting shifty before stealing the sock isn't planning or considering, it's instincts fighting against training

But only humans can ever understand, only we make choices. Because we're extra special

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world 37 points 2 months ago

consciousness is stored in the balls

[-] BrazenSigilos@ttrpg.network 26 points 2 months ago

Next to the microplastic.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 35 points 2 months ago

Calling it a lump of fat is a bit like calling the Milky Way a very sparse field of hydrogen

[-] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 31 points 2 months ago
[-] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 months ago

Right, but it doesn't capture the whole story, namely that it's arranged in a very particular way

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 15 points 2 months ago

Sorry Natural Intelligence bros, but meat can't think. You've been duped into thinking human beings are conscious by Big Omega 3. Intelligence can only exist in computers using real electricity. Not that piddly ion pump stuff.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 2 months ago

The brain is not a "lump of fat". If you desiccate the brain, most of what's left are lipids, yes, but at that point you are not conscious anymore. The brain is a mix of proteins, carbohydrates, water and fat.

[-] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 19 points 2 months ago

A lump of mostly fat then? Seems needlessly specific.

[-] Silic0n_Alph4@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

I’M NOT FAT I’M JUST BIG BRAINED!!

[-] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago

Mostly water, in that case

[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Also fairly sure that electrical impulses alone cannot account for consciousness. If that were "all" there was to it we'd have simulated a human brain by now. There's a few theories about quantum processes being involved but this isn't exactly easily proven.

[-] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 months ago

If that were "all" there was to it we'd have simulated a human brain by now.

Didn't it take them a long ass time to do this for a fruit fly brain?

[-] frezik@midwest.social 4 points 2 months ago

Depends on when you start the timer. The fruit fly brain was only completely mapped recently. There's a simulation of it that runs on a laptop. If that simulation can run on a modern laptop and the map was otherwise available, then it likely could have been done on supercomputers in the decades prior.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] frezik@midwest.social 6 points 2 months ago

To simulate a human brain, we would need a complete map of it. We don't have that yet. If the quantum theories around neurons are correct, then the map would be incomplete without it.

I doubt we could simulate it directly without a very specialized ASIC.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 10 points 2 months ago

We are ALL thinking lumps of fat on this blessed day :)

[-] Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 2 months ago

To my knowledge there are interesting quantum-mechanical effects at play as well though. There's a lot of esoterical nonsense around that of course, however first discoveries pointing into this direction are quite promising.

I always remember a quote from Alan Watts talking about this topic: "You are the universe experiencing itself". The idea of consciousness being an emerging property of the universe itself makes most sense to me, and the non-deterministic properties of quantum mechanics open this possibility.

Definitely more inspiring to think about it this way than just as a lump of fat.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 months ago

people don't like this idea because if that's all we are, then who is anyone to say that the inevitable equivalent man-made lump of fat with electrical activity isn't entitled to all the same rights and status that we are

also jeebus doesn't want you to think you can't go on getting punished even after you're dead

[-] Neuromancer49@midwest.social 7 points 2 months ago

Don't sell yourself short. It's a salty lump of fat.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 months ago

No, you're the electrochemical interactions happening inside the lump of fat.

[-] marcos@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

There's a lot of water and ions (IONS!) besides that lump of fat.

[-] Masta_Chief@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

This gets explored a bit in The Talos Principle and it's sequal. Working on the 2nd one now, it's been fun

[-] Kwakigra@beehaw.org 5 points 2 months ago

I've never understood why people think the most sophisticated and complex technology humans have ever been aware of is too mundane just because we have scratched the surface of understanding it.

[-] Zementid@feddit.nl 4 points 2 months ago

What if life's evolutionary end point is always sentience?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
576 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

13143 readers
1103 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS