69
Any of the original Star Wars trilogy films.
It’s probably worth pointing out that the original theatrical release of what we today call A New Hope was just released as Star Wars, wasn’t even called episode four, didn’t have a title crawl, and included that scene with Jabba but instead of it being Jabba it was some guy in a fur suit, so it’s going to depend on which directors cut you’re talking about.
and included that scene with Jabba but instead of it being Jabba it was some guy in a fur suit
The original theatrical release did not contain Jabba at all. A scene was shot with a human actor, but never used in the film.
We wouldn't get Jabba in the film until the 1997 Special Edition, which replaced him with CGI. In the documentary alongside that release we do see the original clip and Han stepping on Jabba's tail is due to Harrison Ford moving around the human actor in a way that doesn't work with a tail in the way.
We also later got an updated Jabba for the DVD release.
https://screenrant.com/star-wars-jabba-hutt-human-actor-change-reason/
This is making me question a lot of things… I would’ve sworn that it was in the original cut, I distinctly remember the DVD special features talking about that scene having been restored from the original cut. I’m gonna have to go back and find that.
I can't speak to the DVD special features, but the VHS intro has an interview with George (jump to 7:30).
George definitely talks about it like it was always there. To be fair he shot the scene for the film and intended to include it. So George views it as a scene intended for the original cut, but it wasn't.
This is almost certainly what I am remembering, and I definitely remember seeing the VHSs when I was a kid too so this checks out. Thank you for doing the legwork to find this!!!
Lucas has been tampering with the film since the first home release. And he famously refused to hand over the original print for preservation in the National Film Registry. And he refuses to restore and re-release the original cut of the film.
But…there is an awesome fan project called 4K77 that digitalized and restored the original 38mm film for Star Wars. Meaning you can now download a crisp 4K version of the original theatrical version of Star Wars.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Bladerunner.
They took out the music. Like WTF?
Although there are like 3 or 4 different cuts. Not sure if it was technically the Director's Cut.
The latest one "The final cut" is supposed to be the directots cut. It's really good.
Agree, the final cut is good. I prefer the first version, but that's a question of personal preferences, not of quality of the versions.
I might say Donnie Darko as the Director's Cut may complicate the movie a bit for those who prefer the mystery of the theatrical one.
I would say the musical choices are better in the theatrical cut as well.
I don't remember the differences (and there aren't many) but Ridley Scott himself was asked to make a "director's cut" of Alien for the Blu-ray release and he did... But he said something along the lines of "It was hard to figure out what to change. The theatrical cut already is the director's cut. I made it the way I wanted it to be the first time around."
The director's cut of Alien is terrible. All they do is put in more shots of the xenomorph and that ruins the movie in two ways:
-
The reason Alien works so well is you barely see the alien at all. The build up to the end is incredibly good, and
-
The shots that were inserted make it clear it's just a dude in a rubber suit. The alien changes from something to be feared to something to be laughed at.
Speaking of Ridley Scott, Bladerunner had many different versions iirc. Might be a candidate
Leon, The Professional. Besson is a creep.
How does it differ from the original movie? I tried looking it up but I couldn’t find any notes on that. The “International” version seems to be longer. Of course, one of the top results is a Reddit thread where I scroll down and immediately see an “um akshully it’s ephebophelia” comment, which is on-brand for Reddit.
That's pretty much it. They trimmed the sexualization of Portman's character in the theatrical release. The director's cut put it back in. It changes the relationship from flawed underworld father she never had figure, to attempted lover. Jean Reno refused some scenes and forced Beson to take a milder direction then even that as he wanted to go lolita in the film.
Aha! Yeah I’ll skip that, thank you hahaha
anything Zack Snyder gets his hands on. literally anything. he'll take an ok theatrical release and then turn into 3 hours of sheer boredom.
Rebel Moon was already a zero. I'm curious how he made it worse, but I really couldn't be fucked to watch that garbage again.
In my experience, all of them.
The directors cut isn't about watching the movie itself, but examining the process of producing a film - dissecting it.
Two different experiences.
I'd argue that James Cameron's "The Abyss" director's cut is superior to the theatrical. The extra 25min introduces some extra plot details in the climax that really flesh out the ending
The theatrical cut of Dark City assumes the audience is an idiot and spoils the movie's plot twist with an unnecessary opening narration.
What about watching a directors cut unknowingly and loving it?
load more comments
(1 replies)
Justice League
The theatrical Justice League has two things going for it: brevity, and Batman's "just save one" mentor moment with The Flash, which was nice.
Everything else about Snyder's cut is better. It looks better, it sounds better, each scene in isolation plays better, it has fewer cringy jokes. Most importantly, it retains Cyborg's story arc, which it turns out was the heart of the whole damn movie.
load more comments
(4 replies)
How??? The Snyder cut wasn't anything to write home about but the theatrical cut was terribly boring.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
Deadpool 2.
Theatrical jokes are better.
I didn't know there was a director's cut of any Deadpool movie. I knew there was the PG-13 version of Deadpool 2 called "Once Upon a Deadpool" that featured Fred Savage like in Princess Bride
Empire Records. The directors cut tries to make Rex Manning a more sympathetic character but it just works better with him as a villain.
TIL there was a director's cut of Empire Records...
I must have watched that movie a dozen times when I was younger and absolutely loved it. Just goes to show that not every movie needs a director's cut.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Gladiator. The director's cut adds a lot of unnecessary content, which just messes up the pacing of the movie. And sadly, the theatrical cut is hard to come by (impossible?) in HD format.
And sadly, the theatrical cut is hard to come by (impossible?) in HD format.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Star Trek VI. The director's cut interrupts the extremely dramatic mind-meld interrogation scene with another obnoxious flashback every time a character is implicated. I suppose between releases the director must have lost faith in his audience's ability to follow the story without having their hands held.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Alien 3. Though technically not an actual director’s cut (which is bad in and of itself), the assembly cut was sold as being the the next best thing.
But imo its a sloppy version of the film. The ox scene was nonsensical and unnecessary, the ending scene was ruined with bad fx and bad scoring and I disliked the overal pacing.
Its like someone just swapped out a bunch of scenes and went "There ya go, all better now!"
The Legacy cut is imo the best version of the film.
load more comments
(6 replies)
Stargate. The director's cut tried to add to much plot, and the best bits by a mile were the action scenes!
The theatrical cut of Legend, by Ridley Scott, has an awesome prog rock soundtrack.
The director's cut has some generic fantasy movie musical noodling.
It's not even close.
load more comments
(4 replies)
I am assuming that you are lumping extended cuts, special editions and all non-theatrical release versions under the broad category of “Director’s Cut”.
Also to echo what Onomatopoeia posted, all of them.
With all of that said, I have found every Director’s Cut of James Cameron films to be worse than their theatrical counterparts.
Cameron tried to clean up the ending of The Abyss and just made it more silly than the theatrical version.
The additional stuff he added about Ripley having a kid in Aliens wasn’t bad, it was just unnecessary as was the stuff with Newt’s family finding the ship. All of that just messed with the paceing of the movie. Also there is a scene with auto machine guns that has made it into “edited for TV” versions that really don’t belong.
All the stuff he added to Terminator 2 was meh.
I am not going to comment on the Avatar non-theatrical cuts as people love to bitch about those movies.
Cameron is a very focused strong director and it is easy to see why the stuff left out of the theatrical versions of his movies wound up on the “editing room floor”.
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026
69 points (100.0% liked)
movies
3761 readers
76 users here now
A community about movies and cinema.
Related communities:
- !television@piefed.social
- !homevideo@feddit.uk
- !mediareviews@lemmy.world
- !casualconversation@piefed.social
Rules
- Be civil
- No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
- Do not spam
- Stay on topic
- These rules will evolve as this community grows
No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS