You don't need to memorize it really, just have to generalize the position of the minute hand past the last round number. Is it about 40% between the 2 and the 3, then that's a 12.

Who pays if you get so irradiated that you need to be buried in a lead casket, like the firefighters at Chernobyl?

I was with some friends, talking about TV shows. The guys were saying how good Chernobyl was, but women were saying it's too depressing, and they'd rather watch trash TV like Love Island. So to compromise I said they should make a series called Three Mile Love Island. That might be one of my best jokes ever

I'm not a mod, but if that a site was showing different content to different people, perhaps an archived version of the article that matches the headline of the post would be necessary as the link so that there's no confusion.

I don't think there's any legal basis for having "designed in" be truthful, where as "made in" is a requirement for the marking of country of origin for imports.

Supporting Imane Khelif is how you support women in sports

Season 2 of Fargo was at least on par with the first season.

Are you saying the comment is fake, or the sentiment? This was actually posted to reddit: https://archive.is/U9ntj

"A delayed game is eventually good, a rushed game is bad forever"

Exactly this, the .zip file extension is widely known, and now that it's also a TLD, it can be confusing for some people. There's no technical vulnerability, but the existence of .zip TLD just gives more ammo for phishing. For example, someone could register a domain name recent-bank-statements[.]zip (without brackets) and then have a subdomain for chase.com and send someone a link to https://chase.com.recent-bank-statements/[.]zip to "Download your bank statements". If you're not looking closely, you might not realize there is a . instead of a / and think that this link would go to chase.com When the site initiates a download of a zip file, you might trust the contents thinking it came from Chase and not a malicious link.

Publisher Nexon has now made a statement addressing the situation, saying the ads were submitted by users as part of a ‘TikTok Creative Challenge’, which TikTok describes as an “official creator monetization program that turns your creativity into cash by creating UGC-style ads for your favorite brands”.

“All submitted videos are verified through TikTok’s system to check copyright violations before they are approved as advertising content. However, we have become aware of cases where the circumstances surrounding the production of certain submitted videos appear inappropriate. Thus, we are conducting a thorough joint investigation with TikTok to determine the facts.

How could they not see this coming? Of course this will be gamed and abused. This is what happens when you fire your marketing department and outsource it to TikTok.

Boy, I really hope someone got fired for that blunder.