1051

I suggest watching the video, https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QkC1aK7jfLo but the article has an OK summary.

Also a Mastodon shout-out in the video.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] cabbage@piefed.social 73 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I find the disagreement between Cohn and Stewart towards the end to be fascinating. I find it hard to agree or disagree with either. Cohn is looking out for places like the Fediverse - she knows that if the platforms are subjected to regulation that is impossible to live up to for small actors, this will only serve the capitalists. In the US the law would for sure end up serving this purpose because it would be designed by the billionaires themselves, and they would design them in a way that monopolizes the internet even more as they discuss earlier on.

On the other hand, Stewarts is also right. An Instagram feed is not free speech, it's brain rot and propaganda and ruins society and lives. It needs to be regulated. Just letting then go on as they are while promoting alternatives misses the mark as to the threat posed by these platforms. Cohn seems to have a blind spot here.

I think the EU has reached a reasonable compromise. They regulate very large online platforms - platforms with more than 45 million users in the EU - separately from smaller platforms. So your obligations increase with your number of users. Furthermore, EU regulation has exceptions for open source not-for-profit development, to avoid regulation aimed at big tech from hurting free software.

Interesting enough I keep seeing people on the Fediverse attacking the Digital Services Act as though it's gonna mean the end of the Fediverse, even though the Commission is actively posting about it on their own Mastodon instance and the EU is actively supporting the development of the Fediverse through NLnet. It seems to me that even in these spaces people fall for big tech propaganda.

[-] cmhe@lemmy.world 39 points 2 months ago

On the other hand, Stewarts is also right. An Instagram feed is not free speech, it's brain rot and propaganda and ruins society and lives. It needs to be regulated. Just letting then go on as they are while promoting alternatives misses the mark as to the threat posed by these platforms. Cohn seems to have a blind spot here.

I don't think so. She said she wants to make them unable to continue with their business like they did before, with regulations. Just not outright censorship, but instead go fight their data harvesting, decapitating their business strategy.

[-] sakuraba@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

yeah, the root issue is on their business strategy, the brainrot is just the conclusion of several years spent on optimizing engagement

[-] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago

I think Mozilla's controversial "Deplatforming is not enough" lays out a better strategy for "the algorithm" problem to me.

Having big tech be able to work in secret to pick anf choose what content isnt allowed and then being super charged by the state to do it for them as well just doesnt sit well with me

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] tomiant@piefed.social 55 points 2 months ago

Very cool of him to have a spokesperson for the EFF on, they have tirelessly been fighting the good fight for decades now, they deserve all the spotlight.

[-] eleijeep@piefed.social 38 points 2 months ago

Not just a spokesperson. Cindy Cohn is a warrior queen. She's retiring as Executive Director of the EFF this year after serving for over 10 years. She's a lawyer who has been fighting for our civil liberties for over 20 years. Maximum respect.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 44 points 2 months ago

I agree with @wesker@lemmy.sdf.org in their comment. No one in real life is on twitter. Twitter is place that seems real because people on media convince themselves its real and give it substance.

No materially meaningful thing happens on twitter, and its perceived importance is a byproduct of media hyping it up.

Now meta.. thats an altogether different beast. FB market place captured most of what used to happen on craiglist. Its how entire families organize and keep together.

In terms of analysis, I'm annoyed at Cohn here. This isn't something we as individuals have control of. Her saying people individually have to make the difference is like saying you individually have to make the difference regarding climate change by making different choices, like recycling.

[-] MimicJar@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

So Cohn did mention comprehensive privacy laws and the ability to leave platforms. These are absolutely things that need to happen.

However as an individual there are still things you can do. Cohn mentions Bluesky because it has no algorithm (except the "Discovery" feed). Cohn also mentions (in the video) Mastodon. And the truth is you don't need to switch fully, just don't only slurp down the concentrated hate machine(s).

Look at Lemmy. Reddit decided to be pricks and a bunch of individuals jumped over here to create what I think is a pretty good community. That doesn't mean the problem is solved. That doesn't mean Reddit isn't still a problem. That doesn't mean Lemmy is perfect. But that is a win and something individuals can do.

Additionally, those are things you can do now. You don't need to wait for some law to be passed to fix things. You can make the move now. (While still advocating for laws to fix things.)

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] artyom@piefed.social 6 points 2 months ago

This isn't something we as individuals have control of.

Absolute nonsense.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] nullPointer@programming.dev 42 points 2 months ago

I love how Jon thinks reddit is now good. way to miss the mark there man.

[-] cabbage@piefed.social 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I guess they had the opposite development of Twitter, banning hateful content and trying to keep their house clean. Compared to Zuck and Musk whoever runs Reddit can probably be argued to be a great humanist.

Not saying it's a good platform. It's still a cesspool in my experience, and their approach to moderation produces a wild amount of false positives while bots are roaming free. It seems to me very far from a place for genuine human connection.

Nevertheless, for someone who sees social media as being Instagram, Facebook, X, TikTok, Reddit, and Snapchat, I can see how Reddit stands out as the better option.

It's too bad Cohn didn't get to talk more about Mastodon.

[-] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 10 points 2 months ago

While Jon comes across as a white knight, and I really enjoy his satirical personna, I sometimes find his lukewarm condemnation of the Gaza genocide, and take on other subjects, a bit suspicious.

I guess age makes me more cautious.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 39 points 2 months ago
[-] MangoCats@feddit.it 10 points 2 months ago

I never used Twitter in the first place, so I guess I'm not in the "addicted" category, but I did have an account, in November of 2024 I did actively cancel that X account. Google pushes me X links in my "news feed" I consistently tell Google "No more stories from ____ on X" (they won't let you block all of X, I wonder why....)

Seriously, folks, how hard is it to just walk away? I was on BlueSky for about 3-4 months, got a little invested/addicted to the platform and took a hard look at what value I was getting from it - on balance: negative. Cold turkey, do I miss it? No.

Facebook holds a (solitary) users group I occasionally want to talk with captive, they acknowledge it's a terrible platform but they're too lazy to leave, so I log in when I need to talk with them and that's it. Anybody "in there" I care about? Long distance phone calls are free these days, e-mail works, why should I be sharing stuff with people I don't know just to communicate with people I do know?

[-] BanMe@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

The average American feels an unmet need for connection. Social media immediately fills that need, exactly like a drug. For a few minutes anyway. You don't get the benefits of a real connection, just the dopamine. Pretty soon you feel worse, and the best way to stop feeling bad is to hit refresh or keep scrolling. I'm glad we're finally looking at the consequences of social media for kids, then we can look at what it does to adults.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] fubarx@lemmy.world 38 points 2 months ago

EFF supporter for years. Have so many of their t-shirts (amazing designs, btw). Cindy Cohn is the real deal. Anyone online should go pay attention to them.

[-] xSikes@feddit.online 6 points 2 months ago

Just checked them out after the video. Thinking about signing up to volunteer.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 27 points 2 months ago

Give them a few more years and every site except big social media will be flagged as dangerous in your browser, like those without valid SSL certs are now.

[-] fuzzzerd@programming.dev 16 points 2 months ago

Pushing SSL was probably the last big tech effort/push that actually benefited users. Sure it made self hosting a little harder, and probably consolidated some tracking behind bigger players, but overall end users did benefit.

Most of what I see now is purely for their benefit and users don't benefit.

[-] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 months ago

Yeah, rallying against SSL is a weird way to go about it. SSL is one of the biggest and most meaningful changes to come about as a result of the Snowden leaks. The leaks were literally what prompted http to shift towards https instead, because it shined a bright spotlight on how insecure http truly is.

In the short term, it made self-hosting more difficult. But nowadays, with things like nginx and Let’s Encrypt, enabling SSL on your self-hosted site is as simple as selecting a few drop-down boxes, pasting an API key, and automating a cert refresh.

The true “has the potential to gatekeep the entire internet” existential threat is when a company like Meta or Google becomes the authority for things like ID verification or SSO.

[-] FE80@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

“has the potential to gatekeep the entire internet”

Add Cloudflare hosting everything to that list.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Linken@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago

She was a great guest - and it was really cool to hear the "mastadonverse" shoutout haha.

While not 100% her final point, one of the greatest disappointments of the Internet has been watching rot and crumble into just 5 websites, each just posting screenshots/videos from the other four.

[-] Vespair@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 month ago

It remains insane to me that it's so hard for so many to just, not use them. Truly, your life is not being enriched by twitter or Facebook. You can delete your account and I promise you won't find yourself missing them.

[-] Heliumfart@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago

Living rurally, the main thing I hear is "but marketplace". It's a pretty crucial way of getting cheap goods.

[-] Vespair@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago

Honestly Marketplace is the best argument for FB today. How it has usurped Craigslist I don't understand, maybe because it's easier to navigate, but you're right that it is the defacto modern market.

I don't use it so I forget about it, but this is a good counterpoint.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] EightBitBlood@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

The problem is addiction. Same as any other drug. It's no coincidence that Facebook and X were rolled out as free services, with free accounts, where you can interact with anyone for free.

Before the digital drug dealers running each changed that deal. Needing money, running ads, and restricting what you can do that all used to be free.

These companies got us addicted to using tech in place of human socialization and then monitized that addiction.

People can't leave because for some it's the only human contact they have. Even if it's artificial, they still want it to the point of it hurting themselves. Just like any other addiction.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

it’s so hard for so many to just, not use them

Networking Effect is a bitch. It's like telling someone to stop using AT&T or United Airlines. These are the major arteries of communication for billions of people. Individuals can't abstain from using them without isolating themselves.

You can delete your account and I promise you won’t find yourself missing them.

Spoken like someone who doesn't have their entire extended family posting and chatting on the sites regularly. I get calls from extended family, asking me to weigh in on long conversations and exchanges and posting sprees. And then when I respond on the phone, I get a "No, you have to post it, I'm not going to just repeat it to everyone for you".

Tons of social pressure to just go where everyone else is.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] _lilith@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

Droppin the link to the EFF website save you the search

[-] artyom@piefed.social 16 points 2 months ago

Americans: No.

[-] deliriousdreams@fedia.io 16 points 1 month ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago

Watch the video, they have a great discussion. Jon Stewart seems to think Reddit is great now and Cindy Cohn fights back a little.

[-] Folstar@lemmus.org 13 points 1 month ago

In Jon's defense, Reddit was fairly good and useful (unlike Twitter or FB) at one point many years ago. If you're not active there it would be easy to think things are still good.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 months ago

Then she says Bluesky doesn't have an algorithm while he defends the openness of Reddit.

These are the experts...

Yeah it's just follow the money, if a giant corporate entity owns it, it's going to fuck you and leave you for dead without flinching. It's really that simple, whether its mcdonalds verizon google geico paramount or any of the other large companies, youre a number on a spreadsheet and if you die they don't even notice and they will sell you dogshit and leave a smiley face on the receipt. If you owe anything they send your account to collections and minimum wage workers will tell your family they have to pay the debts you left behind.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ptu@sopuli.xyz 12 points 2 months ago

The only way to make money on the internet is by spying on everyone.’ So that’s the good news.”

You can watch the full “Daily Show” segment yourself in the video above.

Ironic how the video is in Youtube and requires a login to watch with VPN

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] zebidiah@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago

good luck, this is like trying to convince a heroin addict to quit because it's bad for them....

social media algorithms are too good, they are too enticing. They have turned distraction into a multi-trillion dollar industry, and they are impacting every single one of our lives whether we are even on the platform or not

[-] innermachine@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Problem is discipline. Reach for a book instead of doom scrolling. Get something done on the house instead of reading X shitposts. The way most people use phones is a sick addiction that needs treatment, and nobody intervenes. I mean people can't look in front of their 2 ton steel cage while they hum down the road at 80mph without checking if some random twat added to their snap story lol.

[-] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You and I are the same. Ive been replacing phone distraction crap with better things like books and crafts. Or my GBC, lol

The human brain can't handle all the shit in our devices. They're detrimental to learning.

I recall a book where people were mandated to have an ear piece that shrieks every 6 seconds, to make sure no one ever has any deep thoughts, to keep them dumb and compliant. Guess what our phone notifications are doing? Its probably the worst thing humans have done in the long term.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] wowwoweowza@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Gee, wonder Fediverse users, how is that even possible? /s

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Turns out getting your news from entities that financially support fascism is a bad idea.

[-] MithranArkanere@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

People still use them? Why?

[-] sakuraba@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 months ago

probably sunk cost (time invested, followers gained, networking) + real addiction (meta and x will try to trigger any emotion from you so you are invested in the platform) + accessibility (free or cheap access on mobile data with big providers)

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] tristynalxander@mander.xyz 8 points 2 months ago

There was a similar post recently about Cambridge leaving twitter, and it got me thinking that universities are really the ideal organizations to host lemmy servers. They have a vested interest in truth and community building. They have a decent enough sense of free speech to stay federated with most other instances. They have pre-existing communities on topic ranging from clubs to technical subjects. Users can confirm their identities by association with the universities, which will keep things civil. Obviously I don't think they should be the only instances - anonymity has it's place and value - but I really think universities should be hosting instances.

Im surprised there aren't student clubs or something hosting instances now that you mention it. That would be a great student project for any CS or even journalism schools.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] architect@thelemmy.club 6 points 1 month ago

We’ve been fucking trying for what? Nearly twenty years?!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
1051 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

85043 readers
1423 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS