33

The judges agreed, until the conservatives sought to include an additional proposition that mandated anyone seeking to enforce the Constitution’s ban on insurrectionist candidates get congressional approval. Four justices—Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Ketanji Brown Jackson, and Amy Coney Barrett—thought that idea went too far, and wrote concurrences in disagreement. Roberts himself wrote the majority opinion.

Roberts also took charge of the court’s ruling that declared the government went too far in charging those who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6.

He had initially assigned the case to Samuel Alito but abruptly took it over himself days after the Times revealed Alito’s wife Martha-Ann hung an upside-down U.S. flag—an emblem of the “Stop the Steal” movement, and propagated by some Jan. 6 rioters—outside his home, according to the Times. It was unclear whether the two episodes were linked; none of the justices answered the Times’ questions

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 hours ago

Have you heard of "sexy indifference"? A relative of mine mentioned it. It kind of makes sense. If you don't seem desperate or greedy for a relationship, you'll be more fun to be around and won't care as much either, because you have your own thing going on.

13

The average life expectancy for American corrections officers is 59, compared with 75 in the general population, according to the Vera Institute of Justice. Officers also experience higher than average rates of depression, PTSD and suicidality.

It was these bleak statistics that in 2019 drove Washington’s corrections secretary at the time, Stephen Sinclair, to explore the Norway model after hearing an Amend presentation at a conference.

Like other states, Washington’s intention has been to adapt elements of Norway’s system, rather than create a carbon copy, and to empower staff and incarcerated people to come up with ideas. “It’s very fluid and dynamic,” Grubb said.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 12 points 8 hours ago

The shots didn't get anywhere near him, he is not a victim. Maybe all of the R's can now go to golf clubs in solidarity with him. It would be way better than wearing a maxipad on their ears.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago

My bad, sorry about that. I picked up the wrong one. I fixed the link.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 7 points 12 hours ago

Apparently, she not only said it after the debate, but several more times afterwards. The numbers are spiking in registrations and their data says that 80% were shown to vote in the next election.

Super interesting stuff: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05gYZ3ji5jY

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 9 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Here is the contrast, a video of Tim Walz.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=McBgj2jaaVM

6
submitted 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) by pelespirit@sh.itjust.works to c/politics@sh.itjust.works

Great info, but a little boring. I suggest speeding it up a bit.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 56 points 12 hours ago

As detailed in the complaint, the defendants’ alleged scheme has three main components. First, an agreement to fix the price of peer review services at zero that includes an agreement to coerce scholars into providing their labor for nothing by expressly linking their unpaid labor with their ability to get their manuscripts published in the defendants’ preeminent journals.

Second, the publisher defendants agreed not to compete with each other for manuscripts by requiring scholars to submit their manuscripts to only one journal at a time, which substantially reduces competition by removing incentives to review manuscripts promptly and publish meritorious research quickly.

Third, the publisher defendants agreed to prohibit scholars from freely sharing the scientific advancements described in submitted manuscripts while those manuscripts are under peer review, a process that often takes over a year. As the complaint notes, “From the moment scholars submit manuscripts for publication, the Publisher Defendants behave as though the scientific advancements set forth in the manuscripts are their property, to be shared only if the Publisher Defendant grants permission. Moreover, when the Publisher

https://www.lieffcabraser.com/antitrust/academic-journals/

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

So the government is capable of higher fines. 3 billion is pretty steep.

In related news, the SEC blocked the use of third-party messaging apps and texts on employee work phones in April, aligning with the standards enforced on the financial industry. The agency has issued $3 billion in fines to firms for failing to maintain adequate records of mobile communications.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 34 points 2 days ago

So six members have pledged to not commit a coup? It's really good news in these times but also a little depressing.

25

If he loses the 2024 presidential election, former President Donald Trump will likely lobby House Republicans to refuse to certify the results.

This was not as much of a problem in 2020 when Democrats held the majority of seats, but with Republicans now holding a narrow majority, it could become a legitimate issue.

However, Politico reports that a bipartisan group of House lawmakers have banded together to jointly pledge to certify the results of the 2024 presidential election, and the group so far includes six House Republicans.

This means that, should these six Republicans keep their pledge to certify a win for Vice President Kamala Harris, Trump's allies would be unable to block the certification of the election given the current numbers in the House of Representatives.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

That crossed my mind as well. They're just going to fight over that one word for forever now.

13

Speaking to WIRED on Tuesday, a senior FCC official said that the final net neutrality order has been updated to ensure that paid fast lanes in consumer-facing products violate the agency’s rules. The official also said that providers couldn’t mask consumer products as enterprise ones to skirt the rules.

In April, the FCC reinstated net neutrality rules that would reclassify broadband, once again, as a “common carrier” service under Title II of the Telecommunications Act. By reinstating net neutrality, the agency can prevent internet service providers, like AT&T and Verizon, from blocking, throttling, or offering pay-to-play fast lanes to online services.

23

A three-judge panel at the second circuit denied Trump’s request, citing Judge Juan Merchan’s delay of Trump’s sentencing date to 26 November from 18 September. Merchan wrote that he wanted to avoid the unwarranted perception of a political motive.

Merchan will now decide on 12 November whether the case should be dismissed because of the supreme court’s immunity decision, which stemmed from a separate, federal criminal case Trump faces over his efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss to Joe Biden. Trump has pleaded not guilty in that case, amid many legal woes still hanging over him.

9

As part of his criminal case over Jan. 6, federal prosecutors described the rioter, Timothy Hale-Cusanelli, as a “white supremacist and Nazi sympathizer,” who told his coworkers at a naval weapons station that “Hitler should have finished the job” and “babies born with any deformities or disabilities should be shot in the forehead.”

Court filings featured multiple pictures of Hale-Cusanelli at work with a “Hitler mustache.” A lengthy online video he posted in 2020 attacked what he called a “Hasidic Jewish invasion” of New Jersey and compared orthodox Jews to a “plague of locusts.”

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

Meanwhile in Nebraska:

Competing abortion rights measures can appear on Nebraska ballot, high court rules

One initiative would enshrine in the Nebraska Constitution the right to have an abortion until viability or later to protect the health of the pregnant woman. The other would write into the constitution Nebraska's current 12-week abortion ban, passed by the Legislature in 2023. The ban includes exceptions for rape, incest and the life of the pregnant woman.

11

The court concluded that pregnant women in the state have a "fundamental right to choose abortion before viability exists under the enumerated and unenumerated interests protected by" the state's constitution.

"The Court concludes [the law] violates the Constitution of the State of North Dakota and is void for vagueness and of no effect," the order said.

Romanick wrote that implicit in the right to personal autonomy, liberty and happiness is "a woman’s right and responsibility to decide what her pregnancy demands of her in the context of her life and in the context of her health."

"Prior to viability, a woman must retain the ultimate control over her own destiny, her own body, and ultimately the path of her life," he continued. "A woman’s choice of whether or not to carry a pregnancy to term shapes the very nature and future course of her life, on nearly every possible level. The Court finds that such a choice, at least pre-viability, must belong to the individual woman and not to the government. "

7
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by pelespirit@sh.itjust.works to c/politics@sh.itjust.works

Almost 95% of the union members - who produce planes including the 737 Max and 777 - voted in the ballot rejected the pay deal.

Of those who voted, 96% back strike action until a new agreement is reached.

As well as a 25% pay rise over four years, the preliminary agreement that workers rejected included a commitment from Boeing to build its next commercial plane in the Seattle area if the project started during the lifetime of the contract.

The union had initially targeted a number of improvements to workers' packages, including a 40% pay rise.

On the face of it, it is hard to see a quick solution unless Boeing capitulates.

17
The look of "winning" (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by pelespirit@sh.itjust.works to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.ca
26

“I don’t know that I would characterize it as [an] active, recruited, knowing asset in the way that people in the intelligence community think of that term," McCabe said. "But I do think that Donald Trump has given us many reasons to question his approach to the Russia problem in the United States, and I think his approach to interacting with Vladimir Putin, be it phone calls, face-to-face meetings, the things that he has said in public about Putin, all raise significant questions.”

McCabe raised suspicions about Trump's attitude toward Ukraine and NATO in the face of Russian aggression and said he's had concerns about his admiration for Vladimir Putin since the ex-president fired him in March 2018, two days before he was due to retire, during the FBI's investigation of Kremlin interference in the 2016 election.

33

Judge Juan Merchan had partially terminated the order after the former president was found guilty in May on all 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree. With the trial over, Merchan ended the order’s restrictions related to trial witnesses and the jury, but he kept them in place for speech targeting Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s staff, court staff, their family members as well as family members of Bragg and Merchan.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 26 points 4 days ago

You can always tell a Maga if they ask you how you live in Seattle because it's so "unsafe" lol.

view more: next ›

pelespirit

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF