Have you heard of "sexy indifference"? A relative of mine mentioned it. It kind of makes sense. If you don't seem desperate or greedy for a relationship, you'll be more fun to be around and won't care as much either, because you have your own thing going on.
The shots didn't get anywhere near him, he is not a victim. Maybe all of the R's can now go to golf clubs in solidarity with him. It would be way better than wearing a maxipad on their ears.
My bad, sorry about that. I picked up the wrong one. I fixed the link.
Apparently, she not only said it after the debate, but several more times afterwards. The numbers are spiking in registrations and their data says that 80% were shown to vote in the next election.
Super interesting stuff: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05gYZ3ji5jY
As detailed in the complaint, the defendants’ alleged scheme has three main components. First, an agreement to fix the price of peer review services at zero that includes an agreement to coerce scholars into providing their labor for nothing by expressly linking their unpaid labor with their ability to get their manuscripts published in the defendants’ preeminent journals.
Second, the publisher defendants agreed not to compete with each other for manuscripts by requiring scholars to submit their manuscripts to only one journal at a time, which substantially reduces competition by removing incentives to review manuscripts promptly and publish meritorious research quickly.
Third, the publisher defendants agreed to prohibit scholars from freely sharing the scientific advancements described in submitted manuscripts while those manuscripts are under peer review, a process that often takes over a year. As the complaint notes, “From the moment scholars submit manuscripts for publication, the Publisher Defendants behave as though the scientific advancements set forth in the manuscripts are their property, to be shared only if the Publisher Defendant grants permission. Moreover, when the Publisher
So the government is capable of higher fines. 3 billion is pretty steep.
In related news, the SEC blocked the use of third-party messaging apps and texts on employee work phones in April, aligning with the standards enforced on the financial industry. The agency has issued $3 billion in fines to firms for failing to maintain adequate records of mobile communications.
So six members have pledged to not commit a coup? It's really good news in these times but also a little depressing.
That crossed my mind as well. They're just going to fight over that one word for forever now.
Meanwhile in Nebraska:
Competing abortion rights measures can appear on Nebraska ballot, high court rules
One initiative would enshrine in the Nebraska Constitution the right to have an abortion until viability or later to protect the health of the pregnant woman. The other would write into the constitution Nebraska's current 12-week abortion ban, passed by the Legislature in 2023. The ban includes exceptions for rape, incest and the life of the pregnant woman.
You can always tell a Maga if they ask you how you live in Seattle because it's so "unsafe" lol.
Friendly reminder, 5 out of 9 SCOTUS seem to have taken bribes: