569
Satan Rules!
(lemmy.dbzer0.com)
The voices in my head just tell me to kill myself tbh
I guess one should doubt any convictions coming from the holy spirit because how can you be certain it's not your own convictions. /s
This is a thing, though. Like all the gay Christians who think everyone always feels that way because we are all always being tested by god and have to actually choose our sexuality rather than just accepting that they have those feelings because they’re not heterosexual and refusing to live as who they really are.
And taking that one step further, it is absolutely horrifying how many of them also assume that being any kind of LGBT "other"-ness also clearly implies that one is an actively predatory pedophile.
'' verily, verily, I say unto you, do not believe in yourself at all, that's Satan talking, umm... yeah, and if you're looking for answers my Christian webinar on finding self worth is $500 this week. On sale from $1,000"
- Shit Jesus Never Said
Technically, I'd say this is one of the few points Jesus and the Devil agree on, but they have wildly different organizations in mind in terms of "church" lmfao.
Well yeah. The two biggest threats to christianity are logic and compassion.
If youre allowed to think or feel for yourself it falls apart.
Christians confound me. How is having faith in yourself a bad thing?
because you need to replace the love you can have for yourself with love for God. You're a miserable wretch who should feel terrible about your own existence, but by loving God, even someone as worthless as you can be loved. Turning your back on the Lord is impossible when when you rely on him for your own self worth; when without feeling his love you are rendered depressed and hopeless. Besides, it's easier to love a perfect being than to love yourself, so this addiction is the easier option to doing that hard work.
Pfffft, no thanks! Jesus already put in the intellectual and emotional labor for all of us, so I’m not going to spit in his face by thinking for myself, thank you very much!
but by loving God, even someone as worthless as you can be loved.
It's worth pointing out, in my experience, most of the churches I've attended swapped cause and effect - that God loved humans so much that he sacrificed his son, which is a reason to love him. Most I've attended don't teach to hate yourself, rather that what you experience now is the baseline of being a "sinner". Basically, you're already in the bad place. No need to hate yourself further. Maybe the churches I attended were just more carrot and less stick.
I haven't practiced religion in a while, but since this seems to be a response to a genuine question, it seems prudent to offer what is typically, in my experience, preached alongside a clearly sardonic answer.
I remember during my deconstruction asking a simple question.
Why did god have to sacrifice his son?
The answer apologists give is that he just had to, that was the only way to cleanse the sins of man.
God is supposedly all powerful though, surely an all powerful being could have just waved his hand and cleansed all the sins. Our he could have just been ok with peoples sins, ever since people have kept sinning and he is somehow ok with that.
The answer apologists give to this is normally some form of
It is the Nature of God that he not be able to dwell with sin.
This of course would logically mean that this all powerful god suddenly is powerless against his own nature, and therefore not all powerful because he doesn’t have the power to change his nature.
Or he chooses not to, he just made a choice that sin is icky and then made another choice that the only way to be ok with sin was to sacrifice his son.
It’s like me coming into your house and saying “the rules are I’m going to torture you forever unless I can make you clean in my eyes, the only way I can make you clean is to cut off my foot because of a set of rules I’m fully in control of. Now thank me for cutting off my foot, I had to, it was the only way, because of the rules that I fully control”
Yeah, what bothers me is the giving of free will, paired with damnation for making the wrong choice and heaven for the right ones.
If anyone set up a scenario for their pet with the intention of eternally punishing them if they make the "wrong" choice, they'd be considered an asshole.
Granted, some interpretations of hell is really just being without the love of God, but knowing how great it should feel, which makes it slightly better? Still icky though.
You touched on it, but for completeness, the official Catholic stance is actually a pretty interesting interpretation that is the result of a kind of wild assumption, and the absolute upholding of free will. Basically God is meant to be the source of all positive things, including feeling and sensation. Every person has a 2 way connection to God. Any positive feeling you've ever had was from him through this connection. When someone commits a Mortal Sin, they are showing they reject God, and sever their side of the connection. Truly repenting will pick the line back up, and God never drops his side so long as you live. If you die with a severed line, he accepts that you really don't want to associate with him, and he drops his side too. And so Hell is not a place, nor a punishment, it's a state of being. All the gnashing of teeth and lakes of fire were originally metaphors for how badly a total lack of Grace, that connection, is. Later Dante's Inferno and other works painted it in a striking way that caught the imagination, but it is not the Church's official stance.
The really fun part is smashing together the idea that Mortal Sin is a rejection of God, and the core concept of the Silent Christian. IE, the Bible very literally, and repeatedly, states that God is love. Like, not that he embodies it, or that he is the source of it (though it also does claim that) but that the two concepts are literally interchangeable. You basically can rewrite it using a replace tool and swap out any instance of God, Jesus, or the Holy Ghost with Love. It does make some kind of philosophical strange abstractness when it talks about loving Love, not that weird, with Love loving things, pretty weird. And it kind of takes "tough love," to a whole new level with some of the wrath he brings in the 1st Testament, but that is fairly low on the list of weirdness between the two Testaments, and the God = love stuff is mostly from the 2nd.
But the core concept in the "invisible Christian," is that those with no faith in a sky daddy can still be good Christians by letting ~~God~~ love into their hearts. Therefore, anyone that has empathy can really be taken to be a good Chrostian, and obtain all the benefits whenever the Bible says you need to beleive in and accept God. And the corollary here is that committing Mortal Sin, IE willingly committing a heinous act such as murder, is a rejection of ~~God~~ love in your life. Of course, the definition of what qualifies as Mortal Sin remains a contentious affair. Though the Catholics are generally more tolerant than the more hard-line sects, they are still pretty backwards here. But if you restrict it to things that cause serious harm to another person, then it becomes a comparatively reasonable model. Much more so than it is popularly presented, at any rate.
That's actually pretty wild.
A big part that disrupted my religious beliefs was, while leading a homeless outreach ministry in college, one of the most regular attendees was in fact sikh. Did some learning about their religion, and I really dug it.
Massive respect and admiration for her to come out regularly - we weren't that Christian when we went out, meaning we never proselytized, but we still prayed together before and after each night, and did some stuff like offer to wash the feet of folks. And she stayed with us through this stuff because she loved helping. I just couldn't accept that someone who is driven to the same loving actions would be judged as going to hell, just because their family was born with a different culture.
Given that context, I really enjoyed the perspective you shared. Thank you!
Close, but his son is also him, so he actually had to kill himself to save us from... Himself. But it's OK because he didn't die, he faked his death and now bunnies lay eggs on Easter, and we'll all still go to hell for being sinners unless we give human-made, tax-exempt institutions human money that was likely earned through some form of sin. Oh and we also have to tell on ourselves to a likely pedophile. That ensures heaven, I'm told.
It’s fun because you could have a very powerful god or a very wise god. The problem with an all powerful or all knowing god is that it just makes everything else arbitrary abusive rules.
God can’t love you if you sin. Why not, he’s ALL powerful, he can do anything he wants. God chooses not to love you if you sin, and then he chooses to torture you for all eternity
I don’t find anything worth worshipping in such an entity if it did exist
If you haven't already discovered DZDebates on YouTube you'll love him. Though it sounds like you may have.
New to me, thanks for the recommendation :D
Honestly it's even worse than that when you consider he didn't just make the rules, he made us. And he did it with perfect foreknowledge of everything that would happen.
So it's not just "he sacrificed himself to save us from himself", it's "he sacrificed himself to save us from what he's going to do to us because of the way he made us".
Also as far as the cutting off his foot thing, it's more like an axolotl cutting off his foot. He'll have in back and be in perfect condition in just a few days.
My sticking point was similar. How jesus' sacrifice was so noble and he died to save everyone who came before, and will come after. Like yea sure thats a big deal, but how many people would take that trade? "Literally all of humanity... or me?" If you presented mortals with that option, mortals who dont know their father is all powerful god, and who dont know theyre going to be taken to heaven for eternity, how many would still take it?
Hell, most mortals have 1 person in their life they'd sacrifice themselves for. As the number saved goes up, the individual sacrifice seems to lose value imo. It wasnt even like he sacrificed himself for an eternity of suffering. He suffered for a few days... on the scale of eternity, thats pretty insignificant
The better ones don't focus on hating yourself, but them telling you to receive love from God is still a substitute for self love. They don't need to beat most people's self worth into submission, as most people naturally struggle with self love. It's hard to accept yourself, but easier to accept others (at least on average). By loving an entity you can't actually meet, you can indirectly receive your own love by imagining it loves you. You don't need to love your flawed self because God will love your flawed self. Just love the one who forgives and you never need to forgive yourself.
The ones that teach what Jesus supposedly did do not substitute God's love for self love. He was asked if the myriad Jewish laws were still in effect or if Jesus' coming had nullifiedthem according to prophecy. Jesus basically says, "love God, love your neighbor, and love yourself. Do these 3 things, and you will never break any moral law. You don't need a list of commandments to follow, because you won't break them if you follow these three."
and yet, many Christians are great at ignoring everything based Jesus ever said.
BELIEVE IN THE ME THAT BELIEVES IN YOU
This is exactly how the mob works. They beat you up (tell you have sin for super natural things like sex and being born), and then you have to make up for those natural things the rest of your life (guilt and give money to the church). Yes, they provide the carrots, but only after they've repeatedly hit you with a stick. They'll then "save" you from the stick.
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
A core tenet of Christianity is to "give yourself fully to Jesus", and a common theme is to juxtapose "trusting in Jesus, choosing actions based on what he did, etc." with "trusting only in yourself, choosing actions based on what you want, etc"
load more comments
(1 replies)
Adam: Hey Lilith, I'm in charge, god says so!
Lilith: Lol, no.
God: Actually, yes.
Lilith: Fuck that I'm gone.
Adam: Well, shit. Can you make me a more subservient breeder please Lord?
God: Yep.
Eve: Uhhh....
Adam: Hey Eve, I'm in charge, god says so!
Eve.....right....
God: He is.
Eve....
Satan: Hey, Eve, you know the fruit on that tree that god told you would kill you if you ate it?
Eve: Yep.
Satan: It won't. But what it will do is give you knowledge like science and the arts. But its totally your call if you choose to eat it.
Eve: Oh wow, nice!
Adam: WTF Eve!
Eve: Fine, don't eat, stay dumb
Adam: OK, I'll have some.
God: Even though I'm omniscient and omnipotent it somehow escaped me where you both were and what you were up to. Anyway, fruit = bad because knowledge like science and art is bad. Get out.
Christians - Satan is clearly the bad guy here.
I hate the focus on us all being doomed by the forbidden fruit. The way I see it we're all doomed because Adam couldn't handle being a bottom. The path to paradise is under a domme.
Could be, sure. But the real question is, why did god make knowledge forbidden? I'll quote Satan directly (via John Milton):
From their own mouths. All is not theirs it seems; One fatal tree there stands, of Knowledge called, Forbidden them to taste. Knowledge forbidden! Suspicious, reasonless. Why should their Lord Envy them that? can it be sin to know? Can it be death? and do they only stand By ignorance? is that their happy state, The proof of their obedience and their faith?
load more comments
(1 replies)
Fun story. Once upon a time, my dad challenged me to find a single wrong thing that God did in the Bible. I pointed out that there are two versions of the Jericho story- the one that they teach in Sunday school, that has a bunch of Hebrews killing everyone, and the one that they don't teach in Sunday school, where a bunch of Hebrews kill everyone except the little girls, and then keep the girls as sex slaves.
"...but any young girl who has not known a man, keep for yourselves."
He stopped the truck on the side of the road and left me to walk home lol.
Edit: just to be clear, the point was that the religious leadership was ordering them to do this, presumably at the direction of their god.
As a non Christian, the immediate 3 I think of.
- He destroyed a man's life on a bet (Job). 2. He destroyed a couple of cities because they didn't like him (Sodom and Gamorrah). 3. He killed the ENTIRE FUCKING WORLD and induced the highest possible genetic bottleneck possible, forcing all animals to be cousin fuckers for generations (the flood).
I mean, the Sodom story had slightly more to it, IIRC...
Yeah but not what the church teaches. The church teaches that homosexuality and promiscuity led to the downfall of Sodom but the bible explicitly states: Ezekiel 16:49 “‘Now this was the sin of your sister Sodom: She and her daughters were arrogant, overfed and unconcerned; they did not help the poor and needy."
But that doesn't really fit with the American church's worldview so they leave that part out.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Thanks Satan, very cool ! 😎
Really supportive bloke, that Satan!
Satan was the good guy.
It was my understanding that one or more of the "lost" books from the Bible that was found in a cache of dead sea scrolls would agree with you. One example was the book of Thomas if I remember? Anyway, the message was that God was, in fact, an usurper, and very much against us.
"The more you know"
Gnosticism.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Well, he did kill a few people. But nowhere near as many as that other dude, watsisname? Jahwe or something.
load more comments
(4 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
That Satan is a pretty cool guy. He uplifts your spirits and doesn't afraid of anything.
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2025
569 points (100.0% liked)
196
4096 readers
2058 users here now
Community Rules
You must post before you leave
Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).
Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.
Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.
Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".
Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.
Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.
Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.
Avoid AI generated content.
Avoid misinformation.
Avoid incomprehensible posts.
No threats or personal attacks.
No spam.
Moderator Guidelines
Moderator Guidelines
- Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
- Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
- When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
- Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
- Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
- Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
- Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
- Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
- Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
- Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
- Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
- Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
- First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
- Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
- No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
- Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
- Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.
founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS