1000
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] soft@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago

that's the joke

[-] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Came here to say this.

She's technically correct, the best kind of correct.

Wow they got our bodies addicted to mrna and now if we take them out we will die??!!!??

[-] neons@lemmy.dbzer0.com 89 points 2 days ago

that's the joke, no?

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago

Certain temperatures can completely denature viruses like HIV and covid. Anything above 600 degrees should do the trick.

[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago

600 degrees Celsius or Fahrenheit?

I'm not sure it matters, bluntly.

[-] Iron_Lynx@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

Kelvin could do the trick too.

Rankine might be a little more iffy though...

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

First one, then the other.

[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Does it matter which one is first?

[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 day ago

Yes if you want to have nice caramelization instead of just burned skin.

[-] Phineaz@feddit.org 240 points 2 days ago

But isn't that what the first poster is playing on? It would certainly lower the chance of transmitting a virus

[-] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 95 points 2 days ago

Yep, plus better 5G coverage for the rest of us too...

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 219 points 2 days ago

I think the commenter in the picture was wooshed

[-] marcos@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago

Also, it's bothering me that it's not immediate.

If he was going to be wooshed, he could at least get the details right...

[-] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 18 points 2 days ago

I think a healthy body could survive a single instantaneous disappearance of current mRNA, as long as the mechanisms to create more mRNA remain functional. All cells would just respond to new conditions more slowly and less effectively for a few minutes to hours, leaving the body vulnerable to disbalancing conditions such as infections. Some cells would die but most of them can be replaced in days.

On the other hand, deleting DNA (and thus preventing the creation of RNA) cannot be survived. A great exploration of such scenario is in the No More DNA chapter in What If? by Randall Munroe: the syptoms would be like eating an Amanita mushroom such as the "Destroying Angel", whose amatoxin prevents DNA transcription, or acute gamma irradiation. The patient is fine for a few hours (or less with a theoretical DNA wipe), then start exhibiting cholera-like symptoms (vomiting, abdominal pain, diarrhea), then they start to feel better. However, at that point, since cells can't divide, immune system collapse or systemwide organ failure is inevitable.

[-] gitamar@feddit.org 11 points 2 days ago

Simon is a communicator/influencer/pr guy from Bayer advising for science. He's doing a lot of meme stuff on LinkedIn. He has a science background so I think the shortening is just for effect

[-] Slovene@feddit.nl 2 points 1 day ago

Does he have a YouTube channel?

[-] gitamar@feddit.org 2 points 20 hours ago

Not that I know of. His Instagram seems to be pretty private. He's most active on LinkedIn.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] halvar@lemy.lol 47 points 2 days ago

i thought that was the point

[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago
[-] Slovene@feddit.nl 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

~~Narrator~~ Morgan Freeman: it is.

[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Who is to say that the narrator isn't Morgan Freeman?

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 28 points 2 days ago

Waitaminute. Are you telling me there are stupid people on the internet talking about things they don't understand?

The internet is the worst thing we've ever done to ourselves. I mean, it was fine at first. But we didn't have enough cynicism to account for what corporations would do with it and that's, sadly, our own fault for being too naive.

[-] Landslide7648@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 19 hours ago

This is a joke. Have you considered the possibility that you are the stupid person in this case?

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 13 hours ago

Have you considered that you may not know which of the two I'm responding to?

[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

We had really high hopes and big dreams for the Internet when it was conceived.

We ended up with social networks that steal and sell you information without your knowledge, and without any compensation to you, and "AI" slop for chat bots, and forum posts and pictures and even video now....

This is not what the Internet was made for.

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 2 points 1 day ago

I don't know if it's true, but it feels like the Internet was better when it was limited to enthusiasts and people in higher education.

Letting every idiot post every word that comes to mind for the whole world to see was probably a mistake.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago

Look up "eternal september" on wikipedia. You're not wrong at all.

[-] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago
[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah, you're probably not wrong, sorry.

Plenty of rich people are shitting up the internet, though.

[-] psivchaz@reddthat.com 8 points 2 days ago

We also underestimated the number of idiots in the population. Or their ability to find little niches in which to congregate.

[-] rimjob_rainer@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The internet is still okay, just don't use any corporate social network and generally ignore everything made by corporations.

[-] biotin7@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I mean you clearly demonstrated how stupid you are, "let's nuke the internet".

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago

When did I say anything remotely like that? Thanks for calling me stupid for making an observation.

[-] biotin7@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The internet is the worst thing we've ever done to ourselves.

Your words tomodachi

[-] Linkalee@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

I mean, it's okay to criticize something because you want it to be better...

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] biotin7@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 day ago

The person doesn't know how viruses work

[-] Piemanding@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago

I mean killing a major portion of all viruses will stop transmission. So would killing the person. Exactly how drinking bleach kills the virus.

[-] hypeerror@sh.itjust.works 49 points 2 days ago

Think of the illnesses you could avoid if you removed your blood!

[-] drosophila 25 points 2 days ago

I actually wonder how long it would take to notice if all your mRNA stopped working.

I don't think neuron action potentials rely directly on mRNA, so I think you'd be able to keep thinking for a bit, and probably moving your muscles too. The closest comparable thing is people that received massive radiation doses (can't make new RNA out of shredded DNA) and in those cases it takes a bit before you start melting.

[-] fullsquare@awful.systems 19 points 2 days ago

I think it would be comparable to situation where all mRNA is suddenly unusable, ie protein synthesis can't run at all. This would be something like ricin or diphteria toxin poisoning, but instead of being limited to gastrointestinal lining it's spread all over. I'd guess hours to days before anything visible starts happening (symptoms only start to appear when deficit in new protein synthesis becomes noticeable; all protein already made continues to work for sone time)

[-] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago

Transcription + translation response time to stimulus is on the hour scale. So it wouldn't be instant. But if your other RNA buggered off then I have no idea. The non-mRNA.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Geodad@lemmy.world 49 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

This is how amatoxins from mushrooms kills you. They shut down mRNA synthesis in the liver.

[-] otter@lemmy.ca 37 points 2 days ago

The amanitin toxin is heat stable, remaining toxic whether eaten raw or cooked. The mechanism of action of amatoxin is by inhibiting RNA polymerase, causing disruption of transcription of mRNA. As a result, hepatocytes cannot synthesize key protein coding genes, leading to the disintegration of nucleoli and pathologically centrilobular hepatic necrosis. This leads to the insidious onset of liver failure over 48 hours. Late onset (more than six hours after ingestion) of vomiting and watery diarrhea occur due to the second component in some of these mushrooms which are phallotoxin. Lepiota species lack phallotoxins so may not have the onset of vomiting and diarrhea until after 12 hours post-ingestion, or may just present with symptoms of liver failure at 24 hours post ingestion.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK431052/

Wow ok 😬

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] hperrin@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 days ago

While you’re at it, can you take out all the acid and all the chemicals?

[-] ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

Someone is flexing his additional chromosomes.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2025
1000 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

16144 readers
993 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS