[-] fullsquare@awful.systems 1 points 13 hours ago

for the last three years and a bit, silicon valley has promised eradication of everything from writer to filmmaker as a career. after all this i don't think that devs get to hitch their wagon to artists for sympathy points

[-] fullsquare@awful.systems 4 points 1 day ago

yeah bet on their blog they posted urbit 101 beginners guide. not linking that for obvious reasons

with such tenure i wonder if some of these people are interns or something in current american administration

[-] fullsquare@awful.systems 7 points 1 day ago

only 8% of the time

[-] fullsquare@awful.systems 4 points 2 days ago

yeah china just makes things, i doubt that iranian military ever had a shot at getting american gnss receivers. any of modern civilian ones allows for use of signals from all 4 constellations anyway, and the jamming resistance comes from either using encrypted signals or by using more sophisticated receivers that have tiny phased array and can cut out a zone where jammer is (to some degree)

[-] fullsquare@awful.systems 9 points 2 days ago

The traditional way to exchange brain worms has been replaced by LW forum tho

[-] fullsquare@awful.systems 30 points 2 days ago

still 84% to go

[-] fullsquare@awful.systems 3 points 4 days ago

idk i think it's new that someone in mainstream sort of calls them cultists, namedrops EY as cult leader and fanfic writer and everything that you could hear about in our circlejerk, but also shortly before EZ said that he's been called doomer and a crank but now he's vindicated to a degree not thought possible. this all happens after drop of that openai financial info, so EZ also held off, and EZ is PR guy so i guess he knows what he's doing, and maybe he thinks this might be it, or maybe he doesn't have anything better and plays his hand in best way he can. i wonder what comes next

[-] fullsquare@awful.systems 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

keep up, chinese are waay ahead of you https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prayer_wheel tell the president about narrowing prayer gap immediately

[-] fullsquare@awful.systems 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

zitron's last podcast calls anthropic/openai top brass weirdos and cultists they are, describes their beliefs about building the machine god as bad philosophy and something that must go hard when you're 12 https://omny.fm/shows/better-offline/the-ai-industry-must-stop-doom-trolling-w-cal-newport

[-] fullsquare@awful.systems 40 points 5 days ago

That's definitely not a sign that Softbank runs out of money

[-] fullsquare@awful.systems 5 points 5 days ago

scams and propaganda

4

I'm picking up an idea left by Dick KK4OBI, that you can lower impedance of dipole by arbitrary ratio if said dipole is zigzagged or otherwise uniformly contorted in some meandering shape. Side effect is that dipole becomes shorter and needs more wire. While there's data about impedance for fundamental, there's nothing about harmonics which is something that OCFD might be expected to handle well, so guessing that the really important part is aspect ratio of meander, i've made a couple of VHF-scale models with different meander aspect ratios (and many more much smaller sections), and some of data i've been able to collect roughly matches. The thing I'm trying to figure is what aspect ratio should be to cover multiple bands while using OCFD, say 40-20-15m bands, and whether impedances at different frequencies fall at the same rate. Eventually, when i figure this out, i'll try to make a full size 40m fundamental antenna, as I think that i've figured it out in mechanical terms

However during testing it turned out that I have severe common mode current problems, as two 10mm dia split ferrite beads were evidently not enough, so what little i've been able to collect is mostly useless. When I packed up everything I've found 4 Laird 28B beads that should together give 1100 ohms of impedance or so at 100MHz which also happens to be close to lowest frequency in my setup. Is this enough? Feedline is currently about as long as shorter arm of straight dipole at 22,5:77,5 split ratio, should I change it?

107
view more: next ›

fullsquare

joined 1 year ago