view the rest of the comments
News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
Still pretending like you leftists didn't directly help lead the country to a shit hole by your Jill Stein votes or your non-votes?
Leftists? How's Gaza looking? Your inaction is why they will be starved to death.
But whatever helps you sleep at night.
I voted for Kamala. Do I get to criticize the republican nazis and democrat asskissers and pushover cosplaying liberals letting all this happen? Or is this the part where you tell me that any criticism of Democrats is evil and wrong and I need to commit to supporting Gavin Newsom three years in advance or I'm exactly as bad as MAGA?
You know who's to blame for Trump? Trump voters.
What we're seeing here is multiple layers of cowardice. Too cowardly to vote for what you actually believe in, and then too cowardly to go engage with actual Trump voters, so instead you hang around here trying to bully progressives into toeing the party line of a party that doesn't represent them.
Incidentally,
I've started noticing a pattern with these "don't blame me, I voted for Kodos" posts, where they almost always finish with a stock guilt-trip phrase like this, or "I hope you're happy" or similar, and not just on Lemmy. And I don't mean every now and then, I mean like, I see these posts formatted the same way regularly, often in threads that are barely relevant to it. Basically, I'm pretty sure that there's a bot farm posting these messages on behalf of someone trying to maintain the two-party system.
Exactly. At this point, anyone still bitching about anti-genocide voters in the 2024 election should be assumed to be a conservative or Russian bot.
I'm not sure it necessarily stands to reason that they'd be a conservative or Russian specifically, unless they ran the numbers and concluded that all this "I hope you're happy with what you did, you Nazi" vitriol would turn people away from the Democratic Party far more than it would whip them into line.
No people are just pissed at third party frauds who helped bury the country. But go ahead with your fake purity
Maybe people should be mad at the politicans who gave up fighting for their voters, and handed the victory to Trump
Maybe more than one fact can exist. Thanks for trump though
See? They're virtually identical the way they all end with the same collection of snide jabs, even when it's (ostensibly) a different poster. They do it again later this thread. It's so stark once you notice it, because you don't see this pattern with any other political topic.
Damn, even when you control all elections with gerrymandering and anti-third-party laws, you still blame third parties.
Meanwhile, here in the USA elections and law say it's all due to our major parties. I guess you just can't face reality, that's sad.
Do you realize how small a percentage this actually is?
Only 33% of the pop lives in swing states, only about half of those are Democrats, only about 2% are defectors. You are bitching about 1/3 of 1% of the pop.
I dunno a single leftist irl who didn't vote for Kamala
I know quite a few.
You and I must hang out in different circles. Good luck gettin through to em 🫡
Politicians are not entitled to votes, they earn votes. This is completely on the DNC for nominating another loser candidate with a platform of "I'm not Trump." If we keep holding our nose and voting for the lesser evil they have no reason to change. Our votes are our only leverage.
https://www.npr.org/2025/06/26/nx-s1-5447450/trump-2024-election-non-voters-coalition
Maybe check your facts and stop spreading disinformation to cover for the abject failures of the DNC leadership and their chosen candidates. It's not like we didn't have two presidential elections prior to 2024 where the Dems lost or nearly lost to learn from yet they decided to lean into these failed strategies even harder in 2024 with very predictable results. It's almost as if they wanted Trump to win.
what is it about losing that makes you so upset? if harris wanted to win she’d have stopped SUPPORTING A GENOCIDE.
I did not vote for anyone who supported genocide.
Why the fuck are you ok with it? there is no such thing as a thrown away vote, only recalcitrance from people who won’t admit they’re ok voting for someone who fucking supports genocide. Go fuck yourself.
Lol. You didn't vote period. So you don't deserve a say in anything going forward.
Once again, tankie. How's Gaza looking? Because of people like you, I'd say pretty fucked. Especially since you are still using the Biden genocide excuse to not take responsibility for Trump's ACTUAL genocide.
But whatever helps you cope.
I find it very telling that you blame the person who couldn't stomach to vote for genocide, instead of blaming your polticians for being pro-genocide.
? I voted but not for harris and not for trump. I don’t vote for genocide. try again.
So then you don't know how voting works in America? It's easily learned.
It seems to me that they do know how voting works in America: If you keep voting for pro-genocide candidates, you keep getting genocide. Maybe one of the two major parties should try running an anti-genocide candidate.
seems like you don’t. i vote for the candidate that fits who I wish to win. marketing and propaganda have you thinking a 3rd party is a thrown away vote. Want to fix that? vote for someone who doesn’t support genocide.
It's not marketing, it's direct experience.
Yes! Third party votes pressure D and R to change their platform and get those votes.
Even if you don't think so, it still happens. For example, Socialists have been fighting for a minimum wage since 1910 (and still fight for higher wages today). They are the only reason for Democrats adopting a pro-labor position in the 30s. I could go on, but it's all brand new to you, you'd lose your mind. Baby steps.
Curious as to when in the electoral history of the US you think this has happened.
It's not an "electoral victory"; laws made by the major parties make this virtually impossible federally. However, their influence is still felt and makes changes.
For example, Greens have been fighting tooth and nail for environmental concerns since the 1980s; they pulled many votes, and viola! Now it's part of the Democratic platform. Libertarians fought tooth and nail for marijuana reform since the 1970s, pulling votes... Ds want those votes! Viola, many Ds have incorporated this into their platform today. Socialists have been fighting for labor since at least 1910, and viola! This was incorporated into Democratic platform in 1930s.
Our major parties don't give them an ounce of credit, but even a few thousand votes gets their attention.
Your account is brand new and that makes sense.
You looking into my account makes sense, you're one of "those" people.
It's always amazing to me how people will blame those that couldn't stomach voting for a pro-genocide candidate, instead of blaming the candidate for being pro-genocide.
I don't blame those who didn't vote for Kamala for her stance on Israel, I get it. I'm just tired of people who didn't vote specifically against Trump then act really surprised that the Democrats are putting up an anemic defense of our rights, because in theory they should have expected it, given how they voted. Asking why Democrats aren't stopping fascism when you ostensibly did not support them because you felt they would not do enough to stop fascism should be readily apparent.
I am not using "you" here as in you, piefood, just as a general you
I get what your saying, and to some extent I agree. But I also don't think that they would be fighting fascism if they had more power. When they were the majority, they spent their time building up the systems that the fascists are using. They built up the surveillance state, immigration control, torture programs and the police/military powers. They should have spent their time dismantling it, but the Democratics have the mindset of "It's OK when the Blue Team does these things. Surely the Red Team won't use that against us!"
it’s all decades of manufactured consent
Nazi supporter.
Right. We had 15 months of weaponizing and covering for Israel's ethnic cleansing during Biden's term, but its the guy who criticizes him and his replacement that's the "Nazi supporter." Your comments are indistinguishable from a MAGA sycophant and you can't even see it.
One of the lessons of the crimes of the Nazis is that the road to Hell is paved with The Greater Good. The Nazis themselves believed that all their crimes were necessary for the betterment of society. They thought though their actions were regrettable, it was the only choice they really had. Killing millions was the lesser of two evils.
You have more in common with the Nazis than you would like to believe. There's very little you cannot justify when you have no red lines and you'll always support the lesser evil. The Nazis themselves thought they were supporting the lesser evil.
who? folks who voted for trump or harris? yeah they are.
As it turned out, the people who withheld their vote for Kamala over the genocide didn't actually matter in the election. Had every one of them voted for Kamala, I'm not aware of a single state that would've flipped. Not even Michigan
It pisses off both sides of the rift, but the genocide didn't matter in terms of the election. Those not voting for Kamala over Gaza don't get any credit/blame for Trump winning. ETA: I'd say they get to claim a moral victory for whatever that's worth.
On the other hand, those who withheld their vote and are hoping the consequences of the election are going to teach the DNC or anyone a lesson are going to be sorely disappointed. No matter how passionate individuals are about the issue, the electorate gave it a collective shrug to absolutely no one's surprise. Nothing is going to change about our Israel policy as a result of Trump's victory.
Some day, our acceptance of the genocide is going to be seen as just as shameful as Clinton's opposition to gay marriage and support of DA/DT. But not today. Fighting about it is just arguing with each other over scraps while the real enemy runs the kitchen.
So, I was alive when DA/DT went into effect, not sure how many people here were. The interesting thing is that as much as it was a cruel and unnecessary policy and in hindsight is completely indefensible, it actually was a step forward for gay rights. Before that the policy was you absolutely would be asked, and if you didn’t tell, you could be charged with a crime. People lost their pensions and got discharged with no benefits just for being gay. Moreover, I honestly don’t think it would have been possible at the time to get a more sensible policy through, because all the usual suspects were absolutely losing their minds about the baby step that it was.
I’m not a Bill Clinton apologist, but I kind of think he deserves a pass on that one. It’s really hard to explain how quickly the ground shifted on that issue from the 90s to the 2010s. Clinton kind of stuck his neck out for progress, as imperfect as it was.
I agree with you. Maybe that came across as anti-Clinton. In my defense, I've always detested the Clintons and have little interest in spending words making him look better.
I do appreciate you pointing that out. It's a valuable lens to look back with. Still, from our perspective today, shameful, even if necessary.
you should really read up on who voted for rfk jr and jill stein it was all conservatives,.
They down vote because they can't defend their alliance with the right. Can't tell them apart from the right most days. Always the same vibes.
Pretty much.
That wasn’t leftists, that was just narcissists enjoying the smell of their own feces.