Honestly? We really should be chanting to Lock Him Up by now. Seemed to work pretty well for them
I literally cheered out loud. I needed this hope. Do not bend to Fascism. Better to die defying dictators than help them rule. Obviously, if you have the option, preserve yourself. But this is the prisoner's dilemma on a massive scale.
Thank you. Truly.
God that's hot af
Nothing they said there seems unreasonable. They/them seems like a perfectly normal (and more importantly neutral) default way of referring to people. If I was in person with someone, and they started throwing a fit because I defaulted to they/them for them (which I usually do), I would assume they were a bigot who doesn't understand pronouns.
Not saying that's the case with these other people, but I believe there's a reasonable limitation on how much you can expect strangers to assume/understand on first meeting.
Yeah I boycott all TERFs and encourage my friends to do the same. Just like the chicken place, and the pillow guy, and anyone else who thinks making other people's lives hell is a valid political stance. Don't gove those people money if you don't have to, please. Just pirate it
Absolutely not. Women are people the same way men are. We ask stupid questions that we didn't think through purely out of curiosity, and then realize how rude it was on the drive home just like you do.
She may be, but if she is, that's a godawful opener. I have 0 rizz but something like 'I like your shoes' or w/e is never hard to pull.
Damn that was a weird twist ending
I feel like pf2e has just enough rules to empower the players to the level I like
The more DM fiat a game has, the more trust I need from my players for things to go smoothly.
That's not a bad thing, necessarily, but for me structure is usually good as long as it doesn't raise the skill floor too high.
Once I've got trust built and feel a bit more experimental, I like Dungeon World or even Universalis
From what I read (yes I actually read the walls of text they post) the two weren't exclusive. There were violent protestors during that time, and the protests in the square were minor, nonviolent, and opposed by dispersion via an announcement rather than tanks.
I'm not sure if I believe all that, but it's better to know what they're actually saying, imo
I mean I'll admit my bias as a politically-minded leftist, but I like them. I don't agree with all their takes, but it feels like a positive way to poke some holes in the echo chamber a bit.
If you take into account the voter suppression we def didn't