416
all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] frunch@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

Padding his resume?

Disgusting person.

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Gearing up for running as the MAGA frontrunner for President.

[-] Akasazh@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago
[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[-] Akasazh@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

The only dangerous dragqueen is a sexually frustrated and closeted one.

[-] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 102 points 2 days ago

Weird how that keeps happening, huh

[-] im_fine_sandy@nord.pub 63 points 2 days ago

All jokes and snarky witticisms aside, the correlation between sex crimes and conservative politics is remarkable.

[-] jtrek@startrek.website 38 points 2 days ago

I read a blog post once about that. If I recall, it made the argument that conservatism is fundamentally about hierarchy and abuse. Child abuse is about hierarchy and abuse. It's thus not surprising they go together.

The blog was more sophisticated than my memory of it, of course.

[-] bufalo1973@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago

Rape is always about power and not about sex.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago

The grand old pedophiles strike again

[-] EntheoNaut@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 days ago

Greedy. Old. Pedophiles.

[-] it_depends_man@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

I am genuinely surprised people still get arrested for that. I suppose protection is only for the super top dogs.

Or that's how they recruit people. Either find those with that kind of history, then make them work by offering, then spring the trap anyway, "for justice".

[-] Sunforged@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 days ago

I was going to comment this. I keep seeing people arrested for pedo behavior but sentencing is a whole other piece that isn't as headline grabbing.

[-] 2hundredpancakes 8 points 2 days ago

"Skin in the game". Getting people dirty and having dirt on them is foundational for any crime ring, but especially pedo freaks.

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

It's always who you most expect.

[-] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I go to one place, I see commenters bemoaning the Democratic pedos.

I go to another place, I see commenters bemoaning the Republican pedos.

Both seem to be oblivious to their own pedos. Both claim the vast majority of pedos are from the other party.

Conclusion? They're both stuffed full of pedos. Epstein list confirms.

[-] hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

😱 /s

GOP = Grand. Old. Pedos.

[-] Danarchy@lemmy.nz 40 points 2 days ago

There are secret symbols pedos use to identify each other for example an elephant

[-] METATRONSTUDENT@lemmy.today 31 points 2 days ago

It’s always the ones you most suspect

[-] deacon@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

This keeps happening.

Odd.

[-] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 day ago

Its always the ones you expect the most.

[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago

What?! No way! ANOTHER Republican is ousted as a pedophile? Who could have seen this coming...

[-] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 5 points 1 day ago

WHY is this News? That was ONE of the Requirements for the Job!

-Republican Voters!

[-] Zephorah@discuss.online 28 points 2 days ago

Someone should make a comprehensive list of the Republican Party’s pedophile contributions in the last 10yrs.

[-] Manjushri@piefed.social 22 points 2 days ago
[-] Zephorah@discuss.online 3 points 1 day ago

Somehow, not surprising.

[-] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I've always been wondering as to why the right have so many pedophiles is because since liberals support LGBTQ+, the conservatives must have conflated LGBTQ+ with pedophilia.

Right: Why are liberals supporting these LGBTQ pedos?

Also the right: If libs support them, then that must mean....

It explains a lot as to why the right elect so many child abusers and turn a blind eye to Trump. They must have thought supporting LGBT rights is tacit support for child abuse, as well as their fixation on pedophiles is innate projection 😂

[-] bibbasa@piefed.social 12 points 1 day ago
[-] Akuchimoya@startrek.website 13 points 1 day ago

The thing that surprises me is he was arrested instead of promoted.

[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Of course he did. That is one of the secret requirements after all.

[-] arotrios@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

I think we're beginning to see that pedophilia isn't just an aberration of a few bad apples in the GOP, rather it's a per-requisite for gaining power in the party. It provides their handlers the compromat needed to enforce compliance with the Project 2025 agenda.

[-] hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

When you reduce your entire being to the selfish acquisition of power, wealth and property, a pathos towards humanity through the lens of Social Darwinism, a glorification of patriarchy, machismo and violence, with the sexual and emotional repression of hyper-religiosity, you’ve created the perfect conditions for the peak of ethical and moral behaviors. /s

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

"Hey... Would a pedophile wear this suit?"

[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago

I find a tiny flicker of hope in the suggestion there's an element in the police force that still does go after these child rapists, despite their GOPedophile connections.

Trump has no shame but if anything should be universally stigmatizing, this should.

[-] uberdroog@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

He had nothing else to offer. Its kinda like being laid off.

[-] bunnybunny@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

So GOP stands for Good Old Pedophiles

[-] Zannsolo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Group of pedophiles

this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2026
416 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30854 readers
2010 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS