Technically correct , the best kind of correct.
foo.lower() would have been a better example.
Technically correct , the best kind of correct.
foo.lower() would have been a better example.
The problem is capitalism. Specifically, the consolidation of power in a small number of decision makers.
Break up the big companies. Stop letting them do mergers and acquisitions. You don't even have to do something radical like dismantling capitalism entirely.
Yeah, if you initialize them to None then for the entire rest of the class you're going to have to account for the possibility that they're None. If it's unavoidable that they might be None, you should type it as such.
If you type them as like str | None then later when you do like return foo[0] it will warn you that you can't do that with None.
That seems like that's going to give you an error in most type checkers. You said it's always an int and then immediate made that a lie and made it None instead.
Why are you trying to do this?
Maybe, if was cheap. Dislike Google and Apple.
Don't care so much about games on the phone as like GPS, texting, ad blocking in the browser.
Hanna's autobiography "Rebel Girl" was a good read, though parts of it are harrowing.
Windows isn't fit for software development unless you're doing Windows specific stuff. Maybe you can get by with WSL or cygwyn or similar, but that's just a bandaid to make the machine less windows. You'll probably still have problems with like case folding and line endings.
Well, when you put it like that then my hypothesis doesn't sound very plausible. But maybe racism just Trump's everything else.
My hypothesis is people are easily frightened idiots. They don't like change of any sort. It frightens them and then they can't reason about if the change is good or bad long term.
If a place had bike lanes for years the same people who bike-lash would probably oppose removing them.
There should be consequences for trying to pass all these horrible and doomed bills. Unfortunately the people keep voting for the people writing them.
I have used copilot a couple times to be like "I have this scenario and want to do this. What are my options?". I'd rather have a good Internet search and real people, but that's all shitted up.
The answers from the LLM aren't even consistently good. If I didn't know programming I wouldn't be able to use this information effectively. That's probably why a lot of vibe coding is so bad.
The biggest problem is most players aren't paying attention and won't remember everything.
If you do elves and dwarves, they'll have some idea of what's happening.
If you do the Wilfren and the Senderri, they won't. Even if you explain it a dozen times. Even if you show them in a dozen scenes.
I may just have trauma from being in poorly fitting groups, but I think getting people to learn a bunch of your custom lore is always going to be a long shot.
If you make the world collectively, you'll have a better chance of it working. But some players hate being creative like that.