568
Anon is a centrist (media.piefed.zip)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by RmDebArc_5@piefed.zip to c/leftymemes@lemmy.dbzer0.com
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FancyPantsFIRE@lemmy.world 102 points 1 week ago

Checks out, there is clearly more IQ under the middle of the graph.

[-] wheezy@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Ah, this is the plot of the integral of IQ.

Edit: + c

[-] bampop@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The centrists took a detour around the part where the IQ is

[-] therealdries@lemmy.dbzer0.com 56 points 1 week ago
[-] SailorMoss@sh.itjust.works 47 points 1 week ago

Everyone is moderate... in their own mind.

If you poll Democratic Party voters they will tell you they are moderate. If you poll them issue by issue most of them agree with Bernie Sanders, the most radical elected left-wing senator.

I think it stems from a profound lack of political education and decades of political propaganda. People think moderate means 'sensible' and radical means 'unreasonable'.

Of course most people think of themselves as 'sensible' or 'moderate'.

[-] therealdries@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 1 week ago

Everyone is moderate… in their own mind.

I'm not.

[-] SailorMoss@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I was using hyperbole to make a point. You're not sensible?

I'm not a moderate either.

[-] therealdries@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

I’m not a moderate either.

Good. I hate those.

[-] tdawg@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Eeverything in moderation... Except for me

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Akasazh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

You're all individuals, you have minds of your own!

[-] alekwithak@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

If you poll ~~Democratic Party~~ voters they will tell you they are moderate. If you poll them issue by issue most of them agree with Bernie Sanders, the most radical elected left-wing senator.

Let's be real here. Back before MAGA was a thing every Republican I knew, and I lived in the deep south so I knew a lot, liked Bernie. If the elite hadn't done everything in their power to kneecap him he would have swept in 2016 and we'd be living in a completely different world today.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] nightofmichelinstars@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago

My pet theory is that idiots subliminally think "centrist" means "central" as in "center of the universe" and it resonates for them. IME the stupidest people are also very self-centered.

[-] OwOarchist@pawb.social 8 points 1 week ago

To a """"centrist"""? Yes.

[-] Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip 47 points 1 week ago

I'm far more bothered by the left being in the right and the right being on the left.

[-] nuko147@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

You think the fascists are ahead of the curve?

[-] wuphysics87@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

No one said your coordinate system needs to start on the left and point to the right. Whar if it started on the right and pointed to the left?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SuperNovaStar 37 points 1 week ago

No no, anon's got a point

[-] Leviathan@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago

Average right wing extremist I've met:

Has never read a book, much less the Bible, despite being a fervent Christian.

Average left wing extremist I've met:

Has actually read books about leftist theory, is willing to debate and have their mind changed. The march I joined a few months ago was basically full of Political Science students from the local university.

Tl;dr: the bell curve up top is accurate, minus the Wojacks.

[-] SalamiDommie@lemmus.org 5 points 1 week ago

There is now a bigger shift where there are some very inept leftists whose dogma harms them (as the conservatives of the 70s/80s/90s).

As well many more well spoken conservatives in the last 10 years. However that benefit is starting to wane and they now have a brigade of social media rhetorist as intolerable as the left.

[-] orioler25@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Could you cite something? I haven't seen any of this, and I'm very curious to see where it's coming from.

[-] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 2 points 1 week ago

I see it on Reddit all the time. Leftists hurting their own arguments because they're repeating things that are just flat out wrong. Most people barely pay attention to the news, have no idea how our government works, and don't read books.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] jnod4@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

Leftist dogma hurts business. Nobody ever died from having a 2 day weekend or from being forced to work less than 40 hours a week

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] nanometer1625@thelemmy.club 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The bell curve part is fine. It's the correlation between IQ and political orientation that is not. One of the biggest fallacies in life is that being smart automatically makes you a good person. It does not, and it also does not determine your political affiliation.

[-] h4lf8yte@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

This! If intelligence were to make you make good choices, intelligence agencies would have no employees.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ButteredBread@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

I guess the curve here is iq is the vertical axis and political orientation is the horizontal axis.

[-] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago

All policies and political structures should be tested to see their influence on HDI, GDPPP, and environmental impact. Whatever improves people's lives should be kept and whatever doesn't should be ignored. Why have beliefs when we can have knowledge.

[-] SuperNovaStar 13 points 1 week ago

why have beliefs when we can have knowledge

Do you know how hard people are to manipulate once they have knowledge? We can't go around informing people, it would be anarchy!

[-] Kitchel@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago

Because humans are storytellers, not scientist by nature. Better (and not necessary for plebeians) story, bigger impact. For example religions or money have diminished our freedom-loving characteristics to almost none-existence, but they sure are good concepts to knit us together to form a society.

[-] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 4 points 1 week ago

There's a country that appoints leaders for 3-5 years, and then measures stuff like human health, gdp, poverty, and uses this information to determine where to assign them next, if at all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 15 points 1 week ago

What about the far-center?

[-] Ashelyn 2 points 1 week ago

The graph gains a z axis, in both directions you get an equally-incoherent far-center

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Avicenna@programming.dev 15 points 1 week ago

I am gonna take a guess and say that he thinks y-axis is the IQ and x-axis is some other random variable like it is a scatter plot except it isn't.

[-] ButteredBread@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

isn't the x axis just political orienration? Probably represented 0-1 or 0-100 0 being right and 1 left of course.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] vegafjord@slrpnk.net 13 points 1 week ago

Sad thing is that this is how most people view politics. This makes sprouts jump to the center when first engaging.

[-] wheezy@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The right side of the graph is showing my imposter syndrome. The more I read the more I feel like I know nothing. Liberal me and SocDem me were a lot happier and definitely felt like they understood everything more.

Opium and the dunning-kruger effect will do that.

Do you currently feel like they understood everything more?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Being high iq is dumb

[-] Godric@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

People who agree with me; SMART

Disagree?: DUM DUMS!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Most people are centrist, most people are average iq. It checks out

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago

Most people are decidedly not centrist, at least not in modern developed countries with their famously polarised politics.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mo_lave@reddthat.com 9 points 1 week ago

What Anon felt like after posting that:

[-] NONE_dc@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Anon failed successfully

[-] GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

In whose fucking universe is MAGA considered a 'moderate right' position????

[-] Leviathan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

In a Nazi's mind.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I mean there definitely could be a chart that looks like this. But I doubt it does in this case. I'm almost curious to see what it would look like but I don't have that much respect for IQ as a measure of anything meaningful anyway. But my guess is there's probably not much difference between IQ across the political spectrum. Perhaps slightly increasing as you move left due to more educated people leaning left, and I would expect there would be some association between IQ and education.

For an example of something that looks like a normal distribution but really isn't:

[-] rockSlayer 10 points 1 week ago

IQ is a racist bullshit measure invented to exclude black people from the military and education. It's meaningless in all cases.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 week ago

Yeah that's kind of what I was referring to.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] diffaldo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

Centrist is maga without red hat.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2026
568 points (100.0% liked)

Lefty Memes

7184 readers
174 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of "ML" (read: Dengist) influence. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, discussion and agitprop/stuff that's better fit for a poster than a meme go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme. Please post agitprop here)


0.5 [Provisional Rule] Try to use alt text or image descriptions to allow for greater accessibility


(Please take a look at our wiki page for the guidelines on how to actually write alternative text!)

We encourage alternative text (from now referred to as "alt text") to be added to all posts/comments containing media, such as images, animated GIFs, videos, audio files, and custom emojis.
EDIT: For files you share in the comments, a simple summary should be enough if they’re too complex.

We are committed to social equity and to reducing barriers of entry, including (digital) communication and culture. It takes each of us only a few moments to make a whole world of content (more) accessible to a bunch of folks.

When alt text is absent, a reminder will be issued. If you don't add the missing alt text within 48 hours, the post will be removed. No hard feelings.


0.5.1 Style tip about abbreviations and short forms


When writing stuff like "lol" and "iirc", it's a good idea to try and replace those with their all caps counterpart

  • ofc => OFC
  • af = AF
  • ok => OK
  • lol => LOL
  • bc => BC
  • bs => BS
  • iirc => IIRC
  • cia => CIA
  • nato => Nato (you don't spell it when talking, right?)
  • usa => USA
  • prc => PRC
  • etc.

Why? Because otherwise (AFAIK), screen readers will try to read them out as actually words instead of spelling them


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" (read: Dengists) (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.


6. Don't irrationally idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.


  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS