429
politics rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 3 days ago by TotallynotJessica to c/onehundredninetysix
all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

oh no i hope a top doesn't start a battle with me and pin me to the floor

[-] TotallynotJessica 4 points 1 day ago

Top used Tackle!

It's super effective!

[-] InvalidName2@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

Just the other night I was laying around naked in bed and watching videos on this exact topic. I came to this same conclusion.

[-] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago
[-] zikzak025@lemmy.world 95 points 2 days ago
[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 days ago

He's right, in politics the top just pounds the bottom, over and over again. In civil society, unions sometimes change the dynamic. The bottom is more confident and learns to wield their power, sometimes that even gives them the power to control the top. The top might never stop trying to fuck the bottom, but with the right rules in place, it can still be a happy ending for the bottom.

[-] TotallynotJessica 7 points 2 days ago

Ironically, the best tops are so good because they pay attention to the pleasure and well being of their bottoms.

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

Pleasure? I'm not sure what you're talking about. I'm talking politics.

[-] prole 59 points 2 days ago

We all know that it's possible to generate a tremendous amount of power from the bottom

[-] Quokka@quokk.au 33 points 2 days ago

The left supports the bottom and the right supports the top.

[-] huquad@lemmy.ml 26 points 2 days ago

Maybe in the rest of world, but in the US we have far right, and diet right. No true left outside of a few specific politicians

[-] cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 days ago

Same in Canada too. Everyone thinks we're WAY better then we are.

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Well... yes. In America the diet right supports the top, and the far right supports the top even harder. The 3 actual leftists support the bottom. So it's still true.

[-] GraniteM@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

Sure, but he's talking to Texas voters. Enough of them think of Republican and Christian as fundamentally bonded parts of their identity that it's going to be a real job getting them to vote in a way that will actually serve their interests.

If a person thinks "I am a Republican," it's not enough to just suggest that maybe they ought to change their allegiance. You've got to give them a pathway to consider a compromise so that you can show them a better way.

Of course, if he gets elected and then either he or the Democratic Party don't actually deliver, they'll have truly screwed the pooch, even more than they currently have.

[-] jorymo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah, I'm Texan and what he said makes a lot more sense in that context. My Trump-voter parents have voiced outright leftist views, but despise the same views given different wording. Like you mentioned, I think a lot of folks treat political affiliation as a team sport tied to their identity more than the sum of their actual beliefs.

Like I'm sure plenty of people think of themselves as Republicans because of the idea of Republicans being no-nonsense, fiscally responsible, patriots and then just support various policies based on their chosen team, instead of putting their views first and their label second. I think plenty could - as long as you avoid certain trigger words - see logically that social programs are good and helpful. Again, you've got to be careful to avoid phrases ingrained in them as signs of weak, whiny, God-hating, flag-burning Liberals, but I think only the most hardheaded and entrenched self-proclaimed conservatives would argue against things like food banks and firefighters

[-] Instigate@aussie.zone 3 points 2 days ago

The truth is that winning elections in a country without mandatory voting isn’t about shifting those rusted-on voters - it’s about getting those who don’t usually vote to step up and do so. A certain percentage will just ALWAYS vote their respective party, because they lack any sense of reflection that would be required to make a genuinely considered choice.

[-] Art3mis 10 points 2 days ago
[-] TotallynotJessica 14 points 2 days ago

Top/bottom exists even in cishet relationships, it's just that people assume men are the top and women are the bottom. Letting go of this assumption would improve the sex lives of many.

[-] Art3mis 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

What? Girl, im a poly trans power bottom. Its just a funny

[-] TotallynotJessica 1 points 1 day ago

I figured, but so is pointing out that cishets could have way more fun if they weren't so afraid of being "gay"

[-] Art3mis 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah no thats real. The happiest cishets i know are a little zesty

[-] vzqq 18 points 2 days ago

Fuck fascists, even poor ones.

[-] BeardededSquidward 6 points 2 days ago

What people who say the only war that matters is the class one seem to forget is that there is a strong contingent of reactionaries that would fight and die for the wealthy. They're as just as much the enemy and shouldn't be given succor.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 23 points 2 days ago

Untrue. They often come together.

[-] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago

Power wise it's accurate, but yeah, the "left" here is fundamentally opposed to there even being a top.

It's more accurate if you're just thinking of the mindless "my team / your team" of political theatre that many people are pawns in. So in that sense it's maybe a useful picture for people who don't really think deeply about politics.

[-] Kn1ghtDigital@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Came here for this comment.

Edit: I'm sorry.

[-] cRazi_man@europe.pub 21 points 2 days ago

Can I have a turn being a top please?

[-] CptOblivius@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

That is why it still exists. Everyone doesn't want to tax the top for the very small chance they get there. Spoiler they won't and will suffer because of it.

[-] cRazi_man@europe.pub 16 points 2 days ago

I'm not a bottom. I'm a temporarily embarrassed top.

[-] crunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago
[-] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Is this the video games live fraudster? No wait that's a different talafreako

[-] nialv7@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago
[-] svcg 11 points 2 days ago

I tried being a top once, but it really wasn't for me.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Everyone thinks they're a temporarily embarrassed non-top.

[-] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 days ago

I like bottom politics

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

These days I judge people pretty much exclusively on how much of a grip on reality they have. That seems to be the only true dividing line.

[-] untorquer@quokk.au 7 points 2 days ago

Time to bottom the tops.

this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2026
429 points (100.0% liked)

196

6470 readers
1863 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS