295
validation rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 4 days ago by TotallynotJessica to c/onehundredninetysix
all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago

Men don’t get enough compliments and often worry about the adequacy of their penises.

If you want make a man happy, compliment their penis.

[-] TotallynotJessica 2 points 2 days ago

Bros need to normalize complimenting each other's dicks.

[-] shonkyshonky@piefed.blahaj.zone 58 points 4 days ago

genuinely have to turn porn off sometimes because the man is both the worst actor on the face of the earth and also won't shut the fuck up which completely kills the experience

[-] Asafum@lemmy.world 32 points 4 days ago

These things kill it for me. Excessive talking, slapping, absurd grunting.... Ughh...

Some are so damn good then the guy starts going all slap boxing on her and it's like wtf??

[-] peetabix@sh.itjust.works 17 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Not to mention some of the women hissing like a snake with a puncture.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

I once watched one where she hissed like a pissed off kitten, which promptly pissed off my then kitten who was sleeping on my bed across the room. I laughed so hard I blacked out and lost my boner.

[-] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Try the manless section. Solved the issue for me.

[-] birdwing 11 points 3 days ago

This is why I only watch lesbian porn, honestly.

[-] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

Literally any thing BUT straight porn.

Straight women and men almost universally are unbearable to watch. From the sounds to the acting. It's all painfully awful.

Solo straight people? For what ever reason are perfectly fine. Its baffling how the moment you put two straight people together their ability to act like a normal creature they suddenly become stupid.

[-] DODOKING38@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

But that's gay

[-] tr0xy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago

Did you mean audio?

[-] fun_times@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago

Unfortunately, that's not just a porn thing.

[-] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 9 points 3 days ago

Yeah it's also a "Men who learned to fuck by watching porn" thing.

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I mean, then the woman will keep telling 'daddy' to give it to her.

Like, where I grew up, my block, one of the neighbor families... the dad literally was raping one of his daughters, for years, he went to prison when he tried to pull the same shit with the younger daughter, fight ensued, and the older daughter and mom ended up with black eyes/broken noses.

I've always been immensely disgusted by the idea of women just verbalizing their daddy issues during sex, but its a very common porn trope as well.

[-] WeLoveCastingSpellz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Okay I am sorry that happened to those people but it is not about daddy issues. To be clear I am a lesbian who doesn't share the same kink but mommy/daddy stuff is from caregiver little kink dynamics that have bled into the mainstream dirty talk a little bit. Kink is safe, empowering for subs with how many guardrails and consent frameworks there are and something I am passionate about. Yucking somebody elses yum is mean in the first place but calking it daddy issues of these women feels lightly misogynistic. Besides in porn specifically I am sure there is a director or something that gave them the lines.

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I'm just saying that I find the trope/kink disgusting, its a massive turn off for me, for the reason I described.

In general, I'm all for kinks with guardrails and safewords and such for everybody, you do your thing.

However, I'm also allowed to have preferences and disprefences. If you or someone else is into calling people 'daddy', great, just please don't do it around or to me, as it literally triggers a sympathetic PTSD reflex in me.

It isn't 'yucking somebodies yum' to explain why I feel the way that I feel about a particular practice. At no point did I attack the broader idea of anyone engaging in this, I just explained why I don't, and why I do not like it.

Also, the etymology of 'daddy issues' is not as clear cut as you seem to think it is. As with many kink/lgbtq+ terms, its complicated and complex and means somewhat different things to different people, and it's had a meaning not directly stemming from totally ethical and safe kink.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/daddy_issues

'Daddy issues' quite literally does mean 'behavioral tendencies that stem from an unhealthy relationship with one's father.'

Its meant approximately that since long before it got the meaning you understand it as having, in an ethical and consensual and healthy caregiver kink/dynamic.

I do not use the term as a flippant expression of annoyance, I use it with grave seriousness.

Its wild to me that you see my usage of the term as lightly misogynistic, when I've pretty well described that my dislike of this kink/trope comes from immense sympathy and empathy from a girl I personally knew as a childhood friend, who was horrifically abused.

Thanks for explaining, I still don't totally agree with you in terms of "daddy issues" but yeah the rest of the issue is fair especially after the edit

[-] melmi 5 points 3 days ago

"Daddy issues" isn't a kink term, and entirely refers to having a poor relationship with one's father. I think you mayhe misread their comment as claiming it was a kink term?

The whole disagreement is that they think its lightly misogynistic to say that the only reason to engage in CG/l, or diluted versions of it like calling your partner daddy during sex, is because you had a bad relation with your father. In other words, using the term "daddy issues" at all was the issue, and you doubled down in this comment.

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

... There are tons of women with legitimate daddy issues or other kinds of history of sexual abuse who also insist on using the phrase 'daddy' to refer to their male partner during sex.

These things are intertwined, to the point that you can often correctly infer that a woman has daddy issues, has a traumatic sexual history, when she keeps calling you daddy, unprompted.

This is what I was talking about, untill it was determined that I am apparently a misogynist for talking about this.

I've known a pretty good deal of straight women where this is the case.

I've also been just platonic friends with a good deal of women, girls, I was friends with, and then I was also friends with their boyfriends, where the girl using 'daddy' in sex led to the boyfriend asking me if she'd had something fucked up about her family life, and me basically saying 'not my place to tell you.'

Yeah, I'm doubling down against using 'daddy' during sex, unprompted, because in my experience, it very often indicates that that woman has been abused/groomed, and that I do not like the broad normalization of this.

I'm getting angry and emotional just writing this, as this brings up all the memories of female friends of mine I've just held while they cried, sometimes without explaining to me why, sometimes with me learning why, years later, in the roundabout fashion I described above.

Again, if its your kink to totally mutually consensually call people 'daddy' during sex, and your partner is into that, great, wonderful, go bananas.

Don't do that near me, don't show it to me, because it triggers a literally visceral series of traumatic memories within me, that I have because I was the person the abused girls cried with, the one they sought out to be consoled by.

Perhaps you can understand how my perference that ultimately derive from vivid memories of consoling female abuse victims ... itself being described as misogynistic... is enrgaging.

[-] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Holy fuck, you're still going on with this?

Might I suggest a therapist? Because this is not a healthy reaction to something that doesn't affect you whatsoever. What other people do in their own relationships has zero effect on you. And if it does, if what people call each other in their relationships offends you, that's 100% a you problem. Your need to shoehorn yourself into someone elses life because you are uncomfortable about something has literally nothing to do with anyone but you.

Perhaps you can understand how my perference

YOUR PREFERENCE! YOURS! Not someone elses. Not anyone elses. YOURS. Just stop right there. No one is forcing you or any partner to call you Daddy. No one is suggesting you have to use it. The alphabet mafia is not putting a gun to your head. But your continued ranting about this and how it affects you, you should really seek some professional help.

You are in fact being misogynistic. You're telling women what they are or aren't allowed to say because it makes YOU uncomfortable. Not your partners, not anyone consenting in any kind of language, you're literally saying women using it is wrong.

That's misogynistic.

It's not your job to tell others what they can and can't use. My partner calls me "puppy". Do you think they actually think I'm a dog they want to fuck? You're not misogynistic for talking about it, expressing how it makes you feel, and the trauma with your friend. It's misogynistic that you are going on tangents telling people that they shouldn't use it because it makes you uncomfortable, which apparently your feelings are more important than anyone elses.

You're 100% in your right to not want it used around you. That's completely fine and acceptable. But you can't come onto the Internet and tell people not to use it, actively INSERTING yourself into the language just so you can be offended by it. You can leave the thread. You can block users. You can just LEAVE. But you are intentionally inserting yourself into this just to tell others that it hurts your feelings.

[-] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

You're literally part of the problem and you're not even realizing it.

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 days ago
[-] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

She already did. You're making it into daddy issues or inappropriateness when it's entirely not that at all.

Just because YOU attribute malice to it doesn't make it so. Your inability to separate the two is a you problem, not a kink or a sub/dom problem. And the fact you went on a whole tangent about how you feel it means makes you part of the problem of perpetuating something that just isn't true.

The fact you felt the need to ramble on about what you think the term means or is derived from, when it was already explained to you that it isn't that.... You're part of the problem.

I'm sorry that happened to your friend. But it isnt up to you how the word is used by consenting couples. You can totally not want it used around you, and that's up to you and your partner. You don't get to tell others not only that they can't use it, but to say it's something it isn't, which is daddy issues.

this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2026
295 points (100.0% liked)

196

6036 readers
1520 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS