715
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 75 points 1 month ago

Can I have 50% of my salary for doing 0% of my work?

[-] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 60 points 1 month ago
[-] Zizzy 37 points 1 month ago

False. They get much more than 50%.

[-] GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 month ago

And they work hard, it's not easy thinking of bigger numbers every month /s

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TheAlbatross 34 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

After following a friend who joined XHS after the initial tiktok ban a year or so ago, I started to notice this trend of Chinese people calling American education "happy education" and I bristled a bit because I didn't find it all that happy. But as I see more and more people point out things like this, how the No Child Left Behind policy was implemented, how resources are diverted away from actually educating children... I kinda get it.

To be fair, I think the Chinese also have a biased lens here since their school days are like twelve hours long, I'm sure 7 AM to 3 PM seems more like daycare in comparison. But I think there's some truth in the mockery.

This doesn't apply to doctoral programs which really just seem like abuse and trauma factories. I don't know a single happy, well adjusted doctor.

[-] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

China kills themselves for schooling and does as well as Americans in business and science so it's hard to see one being better than the other.

[-] otacon239@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

We should just keep trying systems that push everything to the absolute extremes. It’s worked out for every other fallen civilization. Why should we be any different?

[-] prole 6 points 1 month ago

I would wager that the average Chinese citizen is more educated than the average US citizen. And particularly, students who attended school in China are more intelligent, on average, than US school students.

I don't have anything on hand to back it up, but I would be shocked if it wasn't true.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Wilco@lemmy.zip 31 points 1 month ago

This is by design. MAGA wants kids to be stupid, only stupid people vote MAGA.

"I love the poorly educated" DJT

[-] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 month ago

COVID fucked up my kids education so badly they are still trying to catch up. They were in 3rd and 4th grade in 2020, so they lost those prime reading comprehension lessons. But at the same time the schools failed to catch the students up and now they are struggling and instead of helping them they just push them along and pass the buck to the next grade.

[-] ghen@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 month ago

If your kids are fucked up so badly that they can't handle the next grade then they shouldn't be in the next grade. Who cares if they graduate high school at 18, 19, or 20? None of that matters anymore. But you got to be right for your own kids and hold them back if they need to be held back. If you think the school is doing the wrong thing then you got to step in. Don't just let it happen and complain on the internet.

[-] Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

It is infuriating seeing Parents complain that schools are simultaneously doing too much, and too little for children. Be a Parent, help your kids succeed and stop blaming everyone else for not doing your job for you.

It reminds me of another thread on here from weeks ago where someone made a meme about ignoring their kids when they talk about their interests. What the heck? Why did you have kids just to ignore them?

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Be a Parent, help your kids succeed and stop blaming everyone else for not doing your job for you.

When people stop understanding child care and education is everyone's job societies collapse

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] The_Picard_Maneuver@piefed.world 11 points 1 month ago

I'm really sorry to hear that. I think a lot of parents are in the same boat, and we're going to see the effects of it for years.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 1 month ago

I think the whole idea of grading kids like they're show dogs is pretty gross in the first place. "Welcome to the world, kiddo, the first thing you need to learn is that we're here to judge you, and if you don't bark on command you will be deemed to be a failure."

Fuck that shit.

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 month ago

I mean, it's sort of preparing them for the real world.

Once they finish school it's not like people won't immediately start judging them and labelling them as failures if they can't compete / keep up.

If you don't change society before changing the school system you aren't really doing the kids any favours by sheltering them.

[-] brisk@aussie.zone 12 points 1 month ago

School is the real world. It's just their world, not yours. It's where they spend a huge fraction of their day and year. School needs to be a livable place regardless of what comes after. "Preparation" if necessary at all, can come at the end or be taught explicitly instead of implicitly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Who has gone through life not judged on their merits (and a million other things)?

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This would've been a godsend to me tbh. I was really bad about completing buzywork homework assignments but I paid attention in class and already understood the material. In high school I'd ace every test and wind up with a C or worse because of the number of missing assignments, it wasn't even intentional, I just frequently forgot about them because they weren't interesting and probably because of some kind of undiagnosed neurodivergence. Of course, there are also kids who might struggle to complete assignments due to complicated home lives.

I don't think making an incomplete count as a 50 is really making grades meaningless. A 50 is still going to hurt you, it just doesn't drag your grade into oblivion. If a student gets 100 on three assignments and misses a fourth, is a grade of 75 really the most accurate representation of how well they understand the material? Counting the incomplete as a 50 would make that an 87.

Sprinkling in zeros can really drag your grade down and can make it feel like your grade doesn't really have much to do with your understanding of the material, and has more to do with being willing and able to work outside of school hours (or to just copy down answers from a friend five minutes before class, which I also didn't do).

[-] Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 month ago

Rather than giving students points for not doing assignments why not just not have busywork assignments. Just make the grades an even 50% tests and 50% large projects unless the student needs their busywork graded.

I was in the same situation as you (except I did wind up diagnosed with ADHD in my 20s). I aced all my tests and never did homework so was constantly on the verge of failing classes. I always hated having to do the same repetitive memorization busy work when I already knew the info. The best teacher I had in highshool had a rule where they would only ever grade your homework if doing so would improve your overall grade. So because I did well on the tests, in class work, and biger projects I never had to actually do any homework. It's the only class I ever scored over 100% in because I aced every test and did one extra credit project. Why the hell should anyone have to waste their time doing pointless busywork and waste their teachers time grading that pointless busywork when it isn't benefitting their learning in any way. If the student doesn't need it then just skip it. The only reason I can see for it is to desensitize students to doing pointless busywork jobs but we should be eliminating those jobs not conditioning the next generation for them.

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

Yeah, although tbf some people struggle with tests and for them homework brings up their grade, and it might help some people learn. But I 100% agree that it ought to be optional and shouldn't be able to tank your grade if you demonstrate an understanding of the material.

I can sympathize with people who work hard and still score poorly on tests. But if someone's a quick learner and they're motivated by learning then naturally they're going to put in less effort once they understand the subject, and making grades a reflection of effort rather than understanding feels unfair to people like us.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MimicJar@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Exactly. It also gives students the ability to improve and not just give up.

Let's assume 10 assignments determine your grade in a class. You completely skip the first 4 assignments and get 0%. If you completely turn around and score 100% on the next 6 assignments, your overall grade is 60% and you fail the class.

But! If you were the student who skipped the first 4 assignments, what incentive do you have to even try and improve?

The 50% score is to give students without hope a chance. If it's college level, sure maybe failing is the best option. But high school? Middle school? Even younger? Give kids a chance to improve.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] djsoren19 21 points 1 month ago

currently have a stack of students' academic records on my desk, the state of grading in the U.S. is just insane. I hate GPA with a burning passion. Very talented kids burn themselves out over a number that might as well be set arbitrarily, because schools do some very fucky math to inflate their numbers, and they all seem to do the math differently. Why do they do this math? Well, it's because they're allergic to giving out grades lower than a C, so their entire scale would cease to function if they didn't heavily weight different classes over others. It's like a tower of self-caused problems.

[-] The_Picard_Maneuver@piefed.world 10 points 1 month ago

It really should be more standardized, or else schools are just going to find reasons to cook their books.

Remember last year when San Francisco schools were going to adjust their grading scales so much that they could pass students with a D if they scored as low as a 21? Pure insanity. (They fortunately received a lot of backlash and reverted the change)

https://www.newsweek.com/san-francisco-public-schools-equity-homework-2078003

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] chaotic_ugly@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Problem is that the school-to-prison pipeline is a very real thing and kids that are held back or don't finish school are far more likely to end up in prison than those that finish. The way school systems work in most of the US, the differences in outcomes for those with and without a high school diploma are stark and depressing. Finishing is as important as the education itself.

Read: End of Policing - Alex S. Vitale

[-] The_Picard_Maneuver@piefed.world 8 points 1 month ago

It seems like there's almost certainly a confounding variable here: the kids who are likely to engage in criminality are also the ones most likely to do poorly in school, skip classes, and be held back.

It's more correlation than causal - for the same reason that we couldn't just give every student straight A's and expect them to have similar outcomes as students who would have otherwise earned straight A's.

Working backwards like that is like trying to help someone lose weight by tweaking their scale to always show a healthy BMI.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] glibg10b@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

So if you didn't study and you're confident you'll get less than 50%, it's better to not show up at all than to attempt the test?

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I sympathize with this.

As a kid, I'd do the homework, put it in my backpack (thanks to my Mom), yet I'd completely forget to turn it in, despite the whole class getting up to do it, and get a 0%. Turning it in later for ~50% (thanks to sympathetic and confused teachers) saved my butt.

...And yes, I'm definitely neurodivergent.

[-] Black616Angel@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 month ago

Now ask, what a student should get, who did their assignment but only got 30%!

[-] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Personally, I think a UBI-based society can do education better. Everyone should receive a UBI income by default, but working a job or being educated will replace the UBI with a larger amount of money. Grades for learning boosts income based on how good they are. An S-Grade student gets twice of what UBI brings in. 'Real' jobs start at twice the value of the S-grade student.

This means that students can go to college and get paid for it. While the prospect of the workplace can be alluring in a fiscal sense, a college student can stay in college for as long as they need to git good, to be fulfilled, or simply to pass time while waiting for a decent job opening. They aren't held hostage by debts.

Kids also get paid for their grades. This encourages them to learn, because there are material rewards for doing so.

IMO, fiscal responsibility is a skill that is learned, and in America, we don't teach kids how to handle money. Instead, they get the bulk of their fiscal learning when it is almost time to be kicked out of the nest. Which is dumb.

[-] TheSlad@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago

Ok but if the government is spending all that money on its own citizens then how are they going to fund their hobby of blowing up brown people on the other side of the planet?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] JennyLaFae 8 points 1 month ago

I long for a society where education, housing, medical care and food are structured for the people instead of the profit. Where education helps sort people into the work they're suited for. Where housing is something no one does without. Where medical care is fully free. Where food is food instead of fillers, nutrition instead of chemical design, and feeds people over profit.

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Grades have always been meaningless.

People who believe in meritocracy and all that bullshit are just too privileged to notice.

edit: I didn't even realize this was "white people twitter" but makes sense 100%.

[-] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

Grades have always been meaningless.

That could not be further from the truth.

What is meaningless is to reduce grades so much that it's impossible to recieve a failing trade.

I had excellent grades in math and less than ideal in chemistry. So I spent less time studying math and more time studying chemistry. And what do you know... my grade in chemistry suddenly and completely unexpectedly became higher. While my grade in math was still holding steady.

It's a real mystery how I figured out that I should spend more time studying chemistry.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

I grew up in an era when they didn't pass kids to get rid of them. This is why I had a friend in the 8th grade who had two kids.

[-] fodor@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No, sorry, actually teachers have always done that occasionally. It's just that now administrators are forcing it to be done in bulk.

The other thing is grade inflation. A D is passing, right? But many bosses pressure you to give your worst students Bs. And that has definitely gotten worse, too.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

They made Federal funding for education based on the yearly standardized test scores, and graduation rates. One of those is much easier to fudge than the other.

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 10 points 1 month ago

I had a math teacher that would assign 100+ long division problems every night and then give you a 0 if you skipped more than 3 of them.

[-] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That's horrible. Especially since I guarantee you and everyone else in that class had it down after the first 50 problems.

It astounds me how many teachers honestly think that teaching/learning is about drills, rote memorization, and slavishly grinding away to get results. While I have no doubt that some people absolutely need to do this in order to get things to stick, I think it under-estimates the intelligence of most kids in the classroom. I would argue it's not exactly learning and more like programming.

For instance, I can recall "the mitochondria is the powerhouse of the cell" like some kind of Manchurian Candidate sleeper-agent. But that tells me nothing about how that organelle metabolizes ATP to fuel other activities, what happens when it breaks down, and so on. Memorization and drills are great for algorithms, formulas, and basic foundational things. But the real learning happens in other ways.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] stinerman@feddit.online 9 points 1 month ago

I'd have had a 4.0 if i got a 50% for not doing my work.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 7 points 1 month ago

Because no child left behind worked out so well... Here we are having the same idiotic argument 25 years later.

[-] Paragone@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Admins like that are treasonous to the lives they're supposed to be preparing for autonomous-living.

& need be eradicated from education.

No matter what their rank.

School-board types who sabotage learner-opportunity/potential, admins, principals, teachers, processes, policies, proceedures, I don't care what the saboteur is: rip it out & replace it with what is loyal to the learners' lives & potential & opportunity.

If that means segregating the intentionally-ignorant & the bullies from the majority of learners, then do it.

( still bitter over how I wasn't allowed calculus when I was in grade-8 & 9, because the institutional-process dictated I wait, then brain-injury robbed my ability to finish learning algebra, a couple years later.

I COULD HAVE HAD IT IN MY LIFE, but for their "process" regime.

fuckers. )

_ /\ _

[-] arcine@jlai.lu 6 points 1 month ago

This misses the point of grades being a stupid system in the first place. The very idea that people should be numbered and ranked is so readily accepted that we only dare consider how to do it correctly.

The truth is that essays should not be graded at all, because there should be no such thing as grading in the first place.

[-] MrFinnbean@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I on the other hand kind of enjoy the part where we have some system that makes sure people who design our bridges and create our medicene know what they are doing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago

And what if they try and get <50%? This means the system is promoting those who invested nothing and don’t even try.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago

The first problem is that we're conflating Executive function with Knowledge.

If you get a 50 because you didn't understand the material, that's different from not doing or turning in the work.

I'm dealing with this now. The kid turns in his work, gets A's and B's, takes his test, and gets A's. His actual work in school is all A's, B's and 0's

He's learning, he knows the material. He can't hold focus, loses the paper, gets embarrassed if it gets a wrinkle, doesn't turn it in, and won't keep an organized folder.

He gets behind enough that he starts staying up late to finish the work and ends up falling asleep in class. We mediate with the teachers, stand over him to get him to do the work. Try to get him to keep it up once he's out of our sight. We get back on even keel again 2 weeks later, and some teacher who's behind on their grading does batch grading a week before the end of the semester, and we have 10 more assignments that weren't listed in the portal the day before.

Some of his teachers will take a late paper and give him a 50 on it. That's a huge advantage because coming from a 0 is hard.

And in before someone bitches at me that you can't not turn in work in real live, yeah, I know what's why we go to school and that's why we're working on it. Doctors, counselors, teachers, and parents.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2026
715 points (100.0% liked)

People Twitter

9830 readers
138 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS