744
Wise words (piefed.cdn.blahaj.zone)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] RobertoOberto@sh.itjust.works 132 points 3 months ago
[-] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 54 points 3 months ago

Important context. Thanks

[-] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 35 points 3 months ago

I'm pretty open about the fact that I have autism, and there have been a few times when I have used the strategy in these tweets, but adding the invocation of my autism.

When I ask them to explain why it's funny, they will often try to deflect the conversation at first, because they're uncomfortable at being challenged. I can then double down on asking them to explain the joke, being all apologetic and saying that jokes often go over my head because I'm autistic. That makes it much harder to deflect, especially because I'm super good at appearing earnest when I'm asking this, so it manoeuvres the joke-teller into a no-win situation, where they either explain the joke, and look like an asshole, or they don't explain it, and they still look like an asshole.

Then when they do eventually explain it, I am good at making my face fall in disappointment, before saying "oh, that's not a very funny joke". It gives me a great deal of satisfaction because there are many people who believe that autistic people are incapable of lying or acting, when in fact, being autistic means I've spent my entire life learning how to put on a performance for the outer world.

[-] abfarid@startrek.website 80 points 3 months ago
[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 105 points 3 months ago
[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 32 points 3 months ago
[-] HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world 53 points 3 months ago
[-] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago

Stop complying!

[-] Numuruzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 3 months ago

Imagine someone is trying to be friendly with you, but in a manipulative way - they make a joke about your appearance, or maybe even just an assumption they have about you simply from stereotyping. Perhaps it's something you don't agree with, are sensitive about, or is just downright untrue. But it's a minor slight among a litany of other conversation, and is it really worth a confrontation?

This, then, is the question: do you laugh it off and move on? Do you directly refute or rebuke them? Or do you just act like you don't even know what they're talking about and force them to go down the rabbit hole of self-examination to explain why their joke was funny?

[-] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 9 points 3 months ago

I'm not sure I follow - what's the funny part?

[-] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 13 points 3 months ago

Like when a bloke says the missus better have dinner on the table when i get home or else.

People laugh at the implied domestic violence.

Instead don't

[-] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 6 points 3 months ago

(my comment was a joke - I'm asking you to explain as suggested in the OP, I think the person above me was being sarcastic too)

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] MotoAsh@piefed.social 44 points 3 months ago

Who is "they" and why do they want me to laugh and why would it be nervous?

[-] rockSlayer 70 points 3 months ago

Racist/sexist/ableist/etc humor.

[-] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 39 points 3 months ago

The number of people not understanding this is wild to me

[-] snooggums@piefed.world 12 points 3 months ago

It took me a couple readings to catch the nervous laughter part since it isn't something I do myself.

[-] vrek@programming.dev 39 points 3 months ago

How has her dad "just told me" but she "used it for rest of my life ever since"?

[-] CentipedeFarrier@piefed.social 33 points 3 months ago

I assume there’s context missing since it says “replying to”

So I assume they meant something like “my dad only told me xyz” or like “wow that’s nuts, my dad just said xyz, not all that” or something roughly along those lines.

[-] ideonek@piefed.social 16 points 3 months ago

"just" as "nothing more than [...]" - it was not much. "Just" a sentence or two. But it was enought.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The word "just" doesn't only refer to time.

[-] vrek@programming.dev 12 points 3 months ago

Oh, true... Its actually a sad post about her almost mute father. /s

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 23 points 3 months ago

That's really good advice, and I'll take it. Thank you, unnamed Dad. I'll honor your memory by passing it on.

[-] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 15 points 3 months ago

"Sorry, I made a joke. I see you're having a problem figuring it out. Guess I overestimated how smart you are. Let's move on."

[-] Randelung@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

"Then help me please, I want to participate, too!"

[-] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 14 points 3 months ago

"I have the feeling you've been asking people to speak slowly and explain things for a very long time. I guess I overestimated you."

I'm very good at being condescending. That means acting like I'm better than other people.

[jk]

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] falseWhite@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Her dad might have been a psycho and she probably inherited that.

Imagine sitting with a group of friends, sharing jokes. Everyone is laughing out loud and she's sitting there all serious and constantly asking "why is this funny"?

[-] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 24 points 3 months ago

They mean when someone makes a joke in poor taste. Not actual funny things

[-] falseWhite@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Didn't realise you could read minds of people who post on the internet. /s

Where does it say that? You just pulled this out of your ass to make your argument sound legit.

Without additional context you are making assumptions. My argument doesn't make assumptions, because it is purely based on the provided text.

Now which one of us is making shit up?

[-] snooggums@piefed.world 12 points 3 months ago

they will take your nervous laughter as compliance

That is referring to laughing at something when someone doesn't find funny, but doesn't want to stand out.

It isn't super obvious for those of us that don't do that, but it is a thing.

[-] korazail@lemmy.myserv.one 7 points 3 months ago

In addition to the word compliance, called out by nimble, there's also the word nervous.

When do you laugh 'nervously'? When the joke made was from someone with power over you; when it was racist, sexist, or otherwise crass; or maybe when you just don't want to be near the person making it.

In those situations, the nervous laughter may be interpreted by the other person as agreement, acceptance, etc. while it is anything but.

It will take a force of will to not chuckle and just let it slide and instead push the issue, but it may result in the other person actually thinking about the issue and realizing their 'joke' was unacceptable.

[-] RobertoOberto@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago

"If it's not explicitly written out in a way that I can understand, then you must be full of shit."

Allow me fill in the gaps for you so you don't hurt your thinky parts:

https://web.archive.org/web/20191108161005/https://twitter.com/HeatherTDay/status/1192833340543422464

https://tiphero.com/laughed-off-offensive-comments

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mad_lentil@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 months ago

Why do you assume the least charitable assumption? It's good advice in appropriate contexts

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The tone of a lot of these replies seems to be angry and/or defensive...

[-] Acamon@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

I think a lot of people just didn't understand the context. It maybe says something about the people I interact with regularly, but I haven't heard a sexist / racist / uncomfortable joke in person for years. Once I stopped hanging out with teenagers, it pretty much took care of itself.

Understanding the context, and knowing that lots of people have to spend time with assholes, i think it's good advice. But it isn't that surprising that, without any context, lots of people don't assume she's talking about a specific type of problematic joke, sincs there's not really anything in the text to suggest that. In which case it's pretty sociopathic advice.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FridaySteve@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Which ones? I'm not seeing that.

[-] Lumidaub@feddit.org 7 points 3 months ago

People get very angry when you do that on the internet.

[-] FridaySteve@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

On the internet, you get people pretending to not understand things in every context as if walking around slackjawed and clueless talking about all the things they don't understand with some kind of aloof and detached attitude makes them better than everyone else. I think this post is talking about sexist jokes though, not that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Angelevo@feddit.nl 6 points 3 months ago

Just so you know; there is a better option in between.

[-] capuccino@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

This is me:

The other person: I don't get it.

Me: lol then you will not.

The other person: Explain me, I wanna laugh.

Me: no, your get it or not. Explaining a joke ruins the joke. Sorry for you.

It happened to me before with people that wants to ruin the mood. Just do not explain a shit, because a joke must not be explained never, it's a joke, no a scientific paper. There is people that don't get sarcasm, that a special trait, because sarcasm aren't jokes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2025
744 points (100.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

11031 readers
2034 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS