770
rule (lemmy.dbzer0.com)

Source: https://infosec.exchange/users/isotopp/statuses/115059833470035521

TranscriptAge Verification

Due to applicable UK laws, websites must verify the age of visitors using official ID to confirm they are at least 18 years old. We are a small site and unfortunately do not have the resources to implement such a system, so we are unable to serve users in the UK.

We are not required to verify your location, so please confirm below:

[I am not in the UK] [I am in the UK]

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] nomadjoanne@lemmy.world 13 points 4 hours ago

If they have no infrastructure or legal presence in the UK they are not required to do shit. The UK can block them but that's about it.

The UK does not have extraterritorial jurisdiction! Whatever stupid shit they do on their shitty little island does not affect foreign firms that do not operate there.

[-] FuckFascism@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago

Based small business

[-] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

Please post this to r/Unitedkingdom.

[-] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 57 points 10 hours ago

UK has been on a killing small businesses streak since Brexit

[-] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 76 points 12 hours ago

Appropriate that being in the UK is the negative option here

[-] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 8 hours ago

Usually is.

[-] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 8 points 10 hours ago

Makes perfect sense, it's a proceed/go back option.

[-] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 hours ago

In this case it was some banter against Brits, but yeah

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 219 points 15 hours ago

Frankly this is a comically brilliant and absolutely outstanding example of engineering malicious compliance

[-] blargh513@sh.itjust.works 80 points 14 hours ago

Sadly, will not actually be sufficient. They put the full burden of this shit on the site owner, all of it, without exception.

You could host in a country like Cameroon, they won't give a shit and EU won't bother going after them. They could geoblock the whole country however.

[-] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 hours ago

They could geoblock the whole country however.

The Great Firewall of TERF Island

[-] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 6 hours ago

we can compromise and just firewall jk rowlings house

[-] Hoimo@ani.social 3 points 4 hours ago

UK left the EU, so the EU won't be doing anything regardless of your host country.

[-] NoPanko@feddit.uk 51 points 12 hours ago

Meh you just say “we don’t serve users from your country, we are not bound by your laws. users from the UK are breaking our tos”

[-] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

This already happens occasionally with the EU's GDPR.

[-] MagicianWithABadPlan@lemmy.world 32 points 12 hours ago

It's pretty sufficient. I'm not British, I don't sell products in Britain, I do not have British assets, and I'm compliant with all American laws. They can levy all of the fines they want but I'm not obligated to care.

[-] schema@lemmy.world 46 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

I recently looked through the requirements on Ofcom's website, and to me it sounded like every email service falls well into their "user to user communication" category, which would have to "assess the risks". It's not really different than communicating in an internet forum, except it's not public, but that's not really a factor i think. Sending porn via email is probably as old as email itself.

Email providers cant moderate their users' mails (i mean they could try, but that would likely be the end of them for the obvious breach in privacy). And having people have to age-verify for an email account would be ludicrous, especially considering children need emails for school, etc.

I wonder if they ever clarified anything about email services and how they would or would not be affected by this bullshit law.

[-] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 38 points 12 hours ago

You can get porn in a google image search, even in the UK. No ID or login required. I did see a comment about it not applying to search engines, which really does make you wonder what is the fucking point!!

[-] filcuk@lemmy.zip 30 points 11 hours ago

Tracking and spying on the population.

[-] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 8 hours ago

Yeah i dunno how people still don't get this.

[-] hildegarde 10 points 11 hours ago

So a company can collect copies of everyone's ID cards.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Digestive_Biscuit@feddit.uk 19 points 11 hours ago

Door to door mail could be considered user to user too. Oh wait, I shouldn't give them ideas.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 hours ago

I wonder if they ever clarified anything

No

[-] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 139 points 16 hours ago

physically im in the uk mentally im literally anywhere else

[-] pewgar_seemsimandroid 46 points 15 hours ago
[-] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 18 points 14 hours ago

this would be great because according to kerli estonia is made of ice cream mountains and chocolate skies.

[-] GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 2 points 9 hours ago

Trouble is, nobody knows where it's at.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 6 points 9 hours ago

Ironically, you can just lie to get past it.

[-] Gutek8134@lemmy.world 55 points 15 hours ago
[-] Fergie434@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago

Enter your birthdate:

01/01/1970

[-] AspieEgg 37 points 14 hours ago

This isn’t considered verification in the UK from what I can tell. Companies are now implementing AI face scans, ID checks and credit card verification to comply with the UK law. I’m not a lawyer or even British, but it wouldn’t make sense to me that companies would spend money to turn away their UK customers otherwise.

[-] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 12 hours ago

How are they checking that your website’s face scans are actually ‘working’ and not just passing everyone?

[-] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 13 points 12 hours ago

Also what stops someone just getting OBS virtual webcam and just feed it stock video of some old geezer...?

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 14 points 10 hours ago

They make you do things like open your mouth and smile

You'd have to use a video game... Which people are doing

[-] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 hours ago

New business idea, renting out your face via video feed to let people bypass age checks.

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 22 minutes ago

Rough business model to compete with free

[-] MeatPilot@lemmy.world 11 points 11 hours ago

I have an idea. Cardboard cutout masks.

[-] PrimeMinisterKeyes@leminal.space 11 points 10 hours ago

That's never going to pass for a real person.

[-] Gutek8134@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

I know about Online Safety Act, I was making a comparison between the system shown in the screenshot and the one I mentioned

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] MagicianWithABadPlan@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago
[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago

Bandaid to a gunshot wound.

The answer is to make all those politicians (and that person who wanted to profit off from facial recognition) defending this law to regret even existing.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2025
770 points (100.0% liked)

196

4207 readers
2337 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS