273
As a bisexual you're welcome I guess
We're doing our part!
Both your parts.
Oh I'm.sure there are plenty of us. Still hiding. Sadly
Are we still considered "greedy" by both straight and gay people?
I swear, not all of us are sluts. I am, but not all of us.
Thank you for your service 🫡
And how many americans now identify as nazis? Asking for the entire world...
~10% of Americans are LGBTQ+. ~22.6% of the US population voted for Trump in the most recent election.
Is voting participation that low?!
Well, you gotta consider everyone under 17yo can't vote, and then, there's all the people in prison and all the other disenfranchised citizens who have had their voting rights stripped by conservatives.
that figure must be of the overall population.
63.7% overall voter turnout nationwide in 2024.
five states with the highest turnout were:
Minnesota (76.4%), Wisconsin (76.40%), Michigan (74.7%), New Hampshire (74.4%), and Colorado (73.1%).
2020 was the highest nationwide at 66.6%.
more numbers at ballotpedia
Right, that makes sense, thank you.
that figure must be of the overall population.
I’d thought so, but forgot there’s actually people who cannot vote (shocker), so in my mind I went “okay, near-70% turnout, so why didn’t he get closer to 35% rather than 20?”… but this in addition to the turnout this time being lower than I remembered makes waaaay more sense, lol.
And tens of millions of americans just didn't care enough to vote. That was basically saying they are fine with a pedo-rapist who previously attack the captitol win the election. Nazi-enablers.
Or maybe they didn't want to vote for someone they didn't like.
Meaning they were fine with any of both candidate winning...
Meaning they were not fine with either winning.
I would like to ask, what is the point of voting according to you?
At the very least it's harm reduction.
Harris wouldn't be trying to dismantle the government right now if she had won.
Harm reduction is great, but if I do not see a candidate that represents me I am not going to vote.
Why would I support someone that is fucking me over?
If I had the final say in who gets to be president I might have picked Harris, but honestly, your vote is not going to change the outcome of the election, so why compromise your morality?
So you won't vote until you find a candidate that perfectly incarnates what you want? You realize that might be quite hard to reach? I could maybe understand in certain situations, but when the choice is between any random shitty politician and the fucking antichrist, best friend of one of most notorious pedophile ever, that explicitly stated he wants to be dictator and destroy democracy, I think you might want to consider making an exception. But I guess you wont have that problem anymore since the chances you get ever asked to vote again are really small IMO.
I mean the bar is not high. But Harris was literally throwing the election, her campaign was based entirely on not being Trump and she didn't offer anything substantial to the american people. Trump won for a reason. And you didn't vote for Harris either, you voted against Trump.
The chances I will be asked to vote in the american elections are, indeed, small, but not for the reason you think. I referred to americans that did not vote as "they" for a reason.
load more comments
(3 replies)
What a bunch of self serving bullshit. You and everyone else who decided to sit on their ass instead of voting for the better but not perfect candidate are responsible for everything Trump is doing right now.
Not voting isn't going to somehow get you better choices. It's not like we get a do-over if everyone stays home.
I am not responsible for what Trump is doing. But you, if you voted for Biden, are responsible for the genocide in Gaza. And you would have been responsible for what happened under Harris, and let's be honest, it wouldn't be much different.
This is just bullshit... And one of the reasons why the barely functioning democracy is on the best way to an autocratic fascist oligarchy.
There's two candidates to vote for. One is bad for the Palestinians, one is much worse for them. If I don't vote, the one that is much worse gets a higher chance of winning...
Democracy especially if you only have 2 choices is about making compromises.
Apparently a lot of people wasted (likely) all their future choices for an absolute *** (there's two many words that are fitting). That Trump still has such a high approval just confirms to me that we as Europeans should just cut ties with them.
I am not going to vote
I might have picked Harris
lol
That's some poor logic
load more comments
(3 replies)
I could have sworn I read somewhere that it's likely 10% anyway, like 20 years ago. That was the scientific estimate of the time, although I don't though it included the same definition.
That was an estimate. Around that time only about 2-4% identified as gay but it was estimated the real number was higher because homophobia kept most people in the closet.
load more comments
(1 replies)
i vaguely remember a health teacher in jr or sr high saying something like that (this would be back in the '80s).. "about 10 percent, that's the same as at least three of your classmates.." (in that class)....
and then the students kinda all looked around, eyeballin' everybody.. as if they were counting.. yup. checks out. one of them blurted out "that's kinda low, don'cha think?" --this bit is why i remember the class. and she was right. it was low.
I agree. It's really hard to count since so many people love in denial. Bisexual is particularly hard to count, and there's plenty of women who fancy the idea given just how awful men are sometimes.
Edit but not really, but I like "love in denial". Happy typo I'm keeping.
Thanks for saying this. There's literally a gay sex shop called One in Ten in my city, for this reason, that's been around forever.
There was a radio show in Boston for the gay and lesbian community 30 years ago called 1 in 10.
I just saw someone right here on Lemmy in another thread conflating sexuality with sex.
It astounds me that in 2025 people don't understand that sexuality is about attraction. You can be a virgin. You can be asexual and still attracted to people of your own gender. You can be gay or bi or whatever regardless of how much or how little sex you've ever had.
Because a lot of the traditional hetero relationships that Christians have are only different from their other relationships because of the sex. They don't get an emotional and spiritual connection in their relationship, and protect on to others that it's the same.
1-in-10 has been the stat for decades.
Right? I remember a couple decades ago when things just started opening up for lgbtq people that scientists studying sexuality gave estimates that 1:10 people were likely not going to fit the hetero “norm”.
Looks like they nailed it.
Is "Thanks Bisexuals" the new "Thanks Obama"? I hope so.
Being old, I recall in the 1990s the number of Americans identifying as homosexual or bisexual was published as either 7% or 8% of the population. I was involved in the arts, where our group estimate was, with a lot of people were still closetted, the real percentage would be closer to 12% to 15%. Reading this and considering the way the US has gone since then, I think we were probably right, and I'd even go so far as to say perhaps a little low.
Hell yeah dude, bisexuals doing our part to get those numbers up.
Feel like the wording of this headline implies that all Gen Z is LGBTQ+
Not saying that would be a bad thing to be clear
No, but I remember seeing another recent poll about a year ago where the results were that about 20% of GenZ identify as LGBTQ.
This would imply that 10% is the acceptance rate (which has gone up "thanks to GenZ's contribution") and the actual rate is higher than this, but that part is missing from the information.
1 in 10? Those are rookie numbers! We gotta pump those numbers up!
I’m doing my part!
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2025
273 points (100.0% liked)
News
38864 readers
1754 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS