388

Summary

Elon Musk is considering suing Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz after Walz accused him of performing a Nazi salute at Trump’s inauguration.

Musk’s gesture, where he placed his hand on his heart before extending his arm outward, sparked controversy due to its resemblance to historical fascist salutes.

The Anti-Defamation League deemed it an “awkward gesture” rather than a Nazi salute but acknowledged public concern.

Musk, who owns X (formerly Twitter), responded to calls for legal action by saying, “I think I will.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 112 points 2 days ago
[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 71 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Just an awkward arm gesture, like that awkward Mr. Hitler kept doing.

image

[-] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 60 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yes, that salute. The salute Nazis do. The salute specifically for Nazis. The Nazi salute.

[-] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)
[-] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago

Yep I hope he does bring that lawsuit so that the video of his multiple nazi salutes will have to be seen in court as evidence

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

I never knew Hitler was so heartful.

[-] tortina_original@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

Yes, that Nazi salute done by insecure little cock gobbler Elon Musk.

[-] reev@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago

That's an insult to any and all cock gobblers.

[-] fin@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago

lol how it isn't a Nazi salute

And then he turned around inside of 5 seconds and did it again towards where ~~die Führer~~ Trump was standing. TOTALLY not a Nazi thing, bro, just trust me.

🫠

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 126 points 2 days ago

A real free speech absolutionist Reich here.

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 95 points 2 days ago

Thing is, we all saw the nazi salute.

[-] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Don't believe your lying eyes

[-] troed@fedia.io 91 points 2 days ago

The Streisand effect never fails. Let the comparisons between his "awkward gesture" and nazi salutes flow free over all forms of media:

https://masto.sangberg.se/@troed/113879214124108391

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Rooskie91@discuss.online 95 points 2 days ago

More people should call him out so he can waste his money and time in court.

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 64 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's a nice thought, but:

  1. I doubt he'll be using his money for this frivolous lawsuit
  2. It would also waste Walz's and/or Minnesota's money as well as any other defendants
  3. Good luck getting him to pay up if you try to countersue for damages / legal fees.
[-] chknbwl@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

Couldn't someone argue Musk's dual-citizenship could be grounds for moving this from civil to federal; wouldn't diverse citizenship apply here?

[-] distantsounds@lemmy.world 53 points 2 days ago

Please sue & make it official, Nazi.

[-] Bruhh@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago

Why is he so offended? Can't he take a joke? It's not a big deal. He's exagerating. What a snowflake beta male.

[-] moakley@lemmy.world 62 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

What a great idea! Have it confirmed in a court of law that Musk performed a Nazi salute at Trump's inauguration.

[-] samus12345@lemm.ee 34 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Even if you want to play devil's advocate, nobody anywhere EVER keeps their fingers together and their palm down when making an "I'm offering something to you" gesture. The Anti-Defamation League is full of shit.

[-] BrazenSigilos@ttrpg.network 26 points 2 days ago

Every salute by the muskrat is a nazi salute

[-] zephorah@lemm.ee 38 points 2 days ago

If everyone’s saying it how is one guy legally liable for saying it?

[-] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 56 points 2 days ago

Even right wing white supremacists are saying it was a Nazi salute and are thanking him for it. https://www.wired.com/story/neo-nazis-love-elon-musk-nazi-like-salutes-trumps-inauguration/

[-] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

Notably, these people aren't being sued about it

[-] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 days ago

Am I the only one that wants this to happen and have court argue why it is not what it looks like?

[-] cogman@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago

And this is why every state needs anti-slapp laws.

[-] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 20 points 2 days ago

From what I know about Walz, he'll say something like this:

"Back when I was a teacher, we had a very well defined protocol for dealing with troublesome students like this. Kids do and say stupid stuff all the time. Threats aren't tolerated, but if the threat is something that won't really have an effect the response is simple: ok, do it. Otherwise we ignore them and they usually get bored or angrier to really get themselves in trouble."

[-] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 22 points 2 days ago

Do it coward

[-] rauls4@lemm.ee 17 points 2 days ago

Funny that this group keeps accusing dems of politicizing the legal system.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Truth is the ultimate defense.

[-] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Elmo Musk is considering suing me after accusing water of making things wet.

[-] LucidNightmare@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago

Do it, ya little piggie.

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 4 points 2 days ago

That's some mighty expensive free speech you got there.

[-] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

At least we’d have a legal definition of nazi

[-] dvoraqs@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Actions speak louder than words

[-] Octagon9561@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago

Can't wait for Musk to be expropriated and thrown in jail

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
388 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19634 readers
2453 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS