[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago

This reasoning, "I'll do the bad thing because if I didn't someone else would," could justify anything. If that's your moral standard, it's effectively no moral standard. Whether it's an individual or a country, someone has to step up and act better than the worst.

19

cross-posted from: https://piefed.ca/c/canada/p/373772/opinion-canadas-age-verification-bill-for-porn-is-a-slippery-slope-to-a-restrictive-interne

Canada’s proposed Bill S-209, which addresses online age verification, is currently making its way through the Senate, and its passage would be yet another mistake in tech policy.

The bill is intended to restrict young peoples’ access to online pornography and to hold providers to account for making it available to anyone under 18. It may be well-intentioned, but the manner of its proposed enforcement – mandating age verification or what is being called “age-estimation technologies” – is troubling.

Globally, age-verification tools are a popular business, and many companies are in favour of S-209, particularly because it requires that websites and organizations rely on third parties for these tools. However, they bring up long-standing concerns over privacy, especially when you consider potential leaks or hacks of this information, which in some cases include biometrics that can identify us by our faces or fingerprints. [...]

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

It's always referred to as age verification, but it's ID verification. It's the introduction of a regime where you can't use the internet without everyone knowing exactly who you are, and without the government being able to track your activity via your ID. Governments around the world are making what must surely be a coordinated effort to end anonymity, and thus privacy, online. In other countries this has gone along with a push to end encryption for phone calls and chat, and a push to outlaw VPNs. Canada's government is embarking on a program that's very hostile to its own population.

159
submitted 15 hours ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world
60
submitted 18 hours ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/world@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://mander.xyz/post/42924622

After being pressed by reporters, Persad-Bissessar admitted on Friday that at least 100 marines were in the country, along with a military-grade radar, believed to be a long-range, high-performance AN/TPS-80 G/ATOR, which the US defence company Northrop Grumman said was used for air surveillance, defence and counter-fire.

The prime minister claimed the radar installation in the country, which is only seven miles away from Venezuela at its closest point, is part of a counter-drug trafficking strategy, and that she had withheld details in the interest of national security and to avoid alerting drug traffickers.

3
Understanding ECDSA (avidthinker.github.io)
submitted 18 hours ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/math@lemmy.world
[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

The point is terrorism, not combating drug smuggling.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Yes, of course. I'm making fun of a particularly crude religious take that's unfortunately too influential in the USA.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

Canada's code of conduct is "We'll fuck anything up for money." See also our mining corporations, oil companies, etc.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago

Because of the modern-day $$.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Who needs science when all truth is in the Bible? Also, who needs some bits of the Bible when all truth is in the other bits of the Bible? It's just a matter of knowing which is which. If in doubt about this, check the Bible.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They'll make an exception for business use by corporations with enough money to pay, and for themselves. It'll only hurt the little people who can't afford million-dollar lawyers.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

It's not like the White House to tell the truth. He has to be in even worse shape than we thought.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 45 points 1 day ago

I'm Canadian and I disapprove of this message. It would also be nice if we stopped selling weapons to Israel.

12
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/wisconsin@midwest.social

If you live in Wisconsin—reach out to your Senator and urge them to kill A.B. 105/S.B. 130. Our privacy matters. VPNs matter. And politicians who can’t tell the difference between a security tool and a “loophole” shouldn’t be writing laws about the internet.

15
submitted 2 days ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/usa@midwest.social
120
submitted 2 days ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/privacy@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://beehaw.org/post/23492355

Ah, yes ... back to the scare tactics that the only use of a VPN is to access CSAM.

Almost Everyone Uses VPNs

Let’s talk about who lawmakers are hurting with these bills, because it sure isn’t just people trying to watch porn without handing over their driver’s license.

  • Businesses run on VPNs. Every company with remote employees uses VPNs. Every business traveler connecting through sketchy hotel Wi-Fi needs one. Companies use VPNs to protect client and employee data, secure internal communications, and prevent cyberattacks.
  • Students need VPNs for school. Universities require students to use VPNs to access research databases, course materials, and library resources. These aren’t optional, and many professors literally assign work that can only be accessed through the school VPN. The University of Wisconsin-Madison’s WiscVPN, for example, “allows UW–‍Madison faculty, staff and students to access University resources even when they are using a commercial Internet Service Provider (ISP).”
  • Vulnerable people rely on VPNs for safety. Domestic abuse survivors use VPNs to hide their location from their abusers. Journalists use them to protect their sources. Activists use them to organize without government surveillance. LGBTQ+ people in hostile environments—both in the US and around the world—use them to access health resources, support groups, and community. For people living under censorship regimes, VPNs are often their only connection to vital resources and information their governments have banned.
  • Regular people just want privacy. Maybe you don’t want every website you visit tracking your location and selling that data to advertisers. Maybe you don’t want your internet service provider (ISP) building a complete profile of your browsing history. Maybe you just think it’s creepy that corporations know everywhere you go online. VPNs can protect everyday users from everyday tracking and surveillance.
[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 33 points 2 days ago

I don't know what you mean. The man exudes confidence and competence.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 74 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

A fake TV businessman who made his money from daddy and money laundering for the Russian mob, who's also a pedophile rapist and 34-times convicted felon? Of course such a person couldn't do the job of POTUS. The very idea is absurd.

82
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/world@lemmy.world
21
submitted 3 days ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/usa@midwest.social

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/39533023

For the second time in just over a month, a large-scale raid by dozens of immigration agents in New York City was met with a similarly large-scale counter-protest. This time, however, the protesters thwarted the authorities' plans before they began. 

Multiple arrests were made on Saturday during scuffles on the edge of Chinatown, during which hundreds of protesters faced off with federal agents and the New York Police Department (NYPD) as they prepared to launch a raid in the area

It comes just a month after a raid by 50 federal agents using military-style vehicles stormed Canal Street in Lower Manhattan, and was met with a protest of hundreds in response.

The mass counter-protest of some 200 people, according to the New York Times, demonstrates the challenges federal authorities will face in enforcing Trump’s hardline immigration crackdown in a city that is rooted in its immigrant identity.

157
submitted 4 days ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/world@lemmy.world
172
submitted 4 days ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/world@lemmy.world
71
submitted 4 days ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/usa@midwest.social

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/39460857

A college freshman trying to fly from Boston to Texas to surprise her family for Thanksgiving was instead deported to Honduras in violation of a court order, according to her attorney.

Any Lucia Lopez Belloza, 19, had already passed through security at Boston Logan International Airport on Nov. 20 when she was told there was an issue with her boarding pass, said attorney Todd Pomerleau. The Babson College student was then detained by immigration officials and within two days, sent to Texas and then Honduras, the country she left at age 7.

The day after Lopez Belloza was arrested, a federal judge issued an emergency order prohibiting the government from moving her out of Massachusetts or the United States for at least 72 hours. ICE did not respond to an email Friday from The Associated Press seeking comment about violating that order. Babson College also did not respond to an email seeking comment.

view more: next ›

floofloof

joined 2 years ago