198
Anon observes redditors
(sh.itjust.works)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 17 May 2026
198 points (100.0% liked)
Greentext
8243 readers
1017 users here now
This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.
Be warned:
- Anon is often crazy.
- Anon is often depressed.
- Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.
If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The idea that vaginas stretch out is kinda debunked.
Now assholes on the other hand...
I’m not disagreeing with the point of your statement, but I do want to clarify that vaginas absolutely stretch, just not permanently. You’ll have a very different experience if you work up to fisting over a couple of hours vs. launching right into it, because vaginas loosen with arousal.
The important thing is that they are elastic - they don't stay stretched. They're not like sweaters that stay stretched out forever after someone large wears them, more like rubber bands that stretch temporarily before returning to their typical size. I think that's why OP used the term "stretch out," as too many people seem to think once a vagina stretches, it's a permanent change. It's such a weird misconception.
Giving birth stretches a vagina more than any penis (or fist) ever could. Though birth can make some changes that last, it's more like "Now I need a larger size menstrual cup" than "Now penises just slide back out," as the popular belief would have people believe.
Yeah I was gonna mention the menstrual cup thing. The fact that they perceive the vagina as a purely receptive sleeve also suggests that they've rarely if ever had a woman orgasm on their dick. Hubs reports varying perceptibility between different episodes but that the muscular contraction is often robust.
I don't think people caring about body count has anything to do with physical things other than drastically increased odds of STIs and certain cancers.
I think mature adults realize that sex is never just sex, it forms attachments whether you want it or not. Screwing around forming and cutting off attachments constantly kind of fucks with your capacity to emotionally invest in an actual relationship.
Not everyone does form those attatchemnts. There are plenty of poeole out there who can just have sex and have a good time and move on.
Which is equally as worrying, to people who disapprove of high "body count" on assumption that emotional attachments were made
Good point, it also helps filter out people who are innately mental.
That cuts both ways. Who wants someone that becomes obsessed with them. So small body count is out too.
truth bomb fr, and this one gets exponentially worse the older you are
If your brain one days goes like 'I should fuck a thousand guys' and you don't immediately shut it down, there's something terribly wrong with you, and that's before accounting for the STI you are absolutely carrying.
Now. Clearly some incels have an irrational low idea of what a 'normal' bodycount should be, but 1000 in one day ain't it either.
I've had sex with 3 women and rejected sexual advances from 7, I don't think it's unreasonable to want a woman with similar statistics.
Someone might call me an incel for wanting a women with about three bodies but the truth is I've remained voluntarily celibate for the vast majority of my single life. I view sex as a big deal and something to be enjoyed only with someone you love. It's not crazy to want someone with a similar mindset, and if you have 10 bodies you either have too different of a mindset or you're way way outside my age range.
It's really ridiculous how extensively I need to spell this out to not get called an incel. People have reasons. We don't need to jump to conclusions with the least charitable interpretation all the time. Unfortunately it seems like that's literally the only thing a lot (if not most) people are capable of doing nowadays.
i think the way you're describing the process as "screwing around, forming and cutting off attachments" really shows that you think of it in a very black and white sort of way. one can have casual / fwb sex with their friends, and still have a friend relationship with that person. one can even have one-off sex with an acquaintance or stranger, and even if you never meet again, it doesn't really make it a "cut off" relationship; if you met again, it would be pleasant, circumstances just may not arrange it
just because it's a more emotionally involved process for you or some people you've encountered, doesn't make it a universal truth
Sure, you CAN do these things. That doesn't mean it's not diminishing your capacity to be emotionally invested in your relationships.
We can spend all day blowharding and traversing all the layers of subconscious processes abstracted into social constructs, how we are able to rationalize anything if we want to, and so on. But I think you can only get so far with that, when all I'm trying to describe is something pretty much everyone already understands intuitively.
"You can't turn a hoe into a housewife"
Works with gender/role flipped too, obviously.
i genuinely do not "intuitively understand" this idea. there's nothing contradictory about being a hoe and a housewife
can you like, explain this? i really don't understand how having multiple sexual relationships, specifically, diminishes one's ability to have emotionally fulfilling relationships. if anything, i might be inclined to think they would have more emotionally fulfilling relationships 💀
Yeah, it's more about the fact that it's really reckless behavior for tons of reasons for me. I don't need someone like that in my life. Literally every really promiscuous person I know is living a train wreck of a life. Most of them are pretty shitty people otherwise too. Some of them have grown out of it, but with that they became more stable in their relationships and aren't sleeping around like they used to. I'm not saying it's impossible to sleep around and not have tons of issues but I haven't witnessed it so to me it's a red flag.
If they don't stretch out, then why do some doctors offer complimentary tightening surgery on postpartum mothers?
Weirdly, it's actually the same reason that banks used to refuse to let single women have credit cards
Ouch. That is so fucked up. I am older and have been structurally tight (skin too tight at opening) sex hurts when it goes on too long. The "husband stitch" is abusive. And doctors do it because they do episiotomy, which is also awful because that cut doesn't heal as well as a repaired natural tear and you might not tear at all.
Complimentary tightening surgery my ass. That doesn't help mothers at all.
Rehab with kegels does help and obviously if you tear, a repair. The midwife recommended working up to fisting before having a baby and man I wish I had taken that advice.
But being tight right at the opening of the vagina just hurts, there is no advantage to it.
Because infants are larger than penises. Hope this helps!
Seriously Jenna.. get it together
I don't know, but I read that vinegar not only clears any bad smells but also tightens it up.
no
I don't think you know what you're talking about or your fellow downvoters. I read that in a reputable publication over well about three decades back and I take their word over some naysayer online with no backup information or sources.
Not only that but I've had women tell me it's true that vinegar cleans smells and tightens the area. You are not a reputable source.
When it comes to women's health advice, I think modern naysayers are more reputable than any source was in the 1900s
I read this in the late 90s. And I'm still siding with them over some bandwagon jumper on her off the fucking internets. You're not a reliable source. Someone else said something that sounded authoritative so perhaps nevertheless.
Also I don't give a shit. I was just sharing what I read from an authoritative source, you can piss all the way off.
This ..line of thinking is why my step father wouldnt let me or my sister shower while on the rag in our teens. He had some old ass info, ignored doctors, and me and my sister suffered at the hands of his misinformation. He wouldnt even buy us tampons or pads and we used paper towels. I have no idea why he said we couldnt shower while having a period. The man was a fool and now lives in isolation. anyway..
ita okay to be wrong, but its not okay to spread that info. it can harm women.
I shared something I read from a reputable Source at the time that was confirmed by other people that I had talked to, you say it's wrong whatever it's wrong.
There's a nice way to correct somebody if you think they're wrong.
tell me the source!?
Willful ignorance isnt cute
I already went through this with somebody that was not insulting me personally. I don't care what you think.
im sorry youre so misreable in life.
Oh rather!
Youre not right about this. Im sorry. Some women do douche, but most doctors will advise against using anything like this. Mild soap externally is all that is recomended by most Obgyns.
This info you have is old wives tales, not modern science.