ah, good, there's not much daylight left
me waking up at 5pm:
ah, good, there's not much daylight left
me waking up at 5pm:
it seems like you may have missed the first part of my last response, so i'll copy it here again:
i'm not them, so i can't provide you a comprehensive set of answers, and i'm fairly sure those answers vary (*by individual), as well
i would also encourage you to not worry about the answers to those questions very much, since it's plainly obvious you don't have any people who identify as or with robots in your life, so it's not really a situation you need to worry about. and, should you meet one, i would encourage you to direct your questions to them with the same sensitivity you would ask of a cisgender person asking questions about a transgender person, and also to remember that, while there are commonalities in experience, everyone is unique in their own way, as well
respectfully, i'm not sure you're engaging in good faith, so i don't really want to interact with you anymore. if you'd like to demonstrate that you're not "just asking questions", i'll be happy to chat more; but again, i do not identify with robots - i simply think people who do are still worthy of respect - so i'm not sure i have anything worthwhile left to say to you, anyways
bisexuality isn't inherently transphobic!
not saying you're necessarily implying that, but it's a general stereotype which, while it can be true on an individual level, certainly isn't when taken as a whole
here's the bisexual manifesto, also, since it goes hard: https://bitheway.carrd.co/#manifesto
i'd like to see more than "i don't know if it holds water", especially since you don't couch it nearly as well in your previous post bringing it up
a thesis is on the onus of who brings it up to substantiate it; if you can't defend it, i would question the wisdom of bringing it up in an already contentious conversation
i have nothing to add but i like the idea and enjoyed reading the post
i long to see the woke sky...
Astonishingly, the ruling specifies that what it calls “women living in the male gender”—i.e., trans men, and cis women whose appearance is deemed masculine—“could also be excluded” alongside cis men, from women’s spaces. “Not being allowed into the mens by rule does not mean you have the right to go into the ladies,” clarified the leading anti-trans campaigner Maya Forstater; “That may seem unfair, but these are life choices people make. If you make extreme efforts to look like a man don’t be surprised if you are denied entrance to ladies.” Forstater’s comments underscore the ultimate goal of TERFs and other transphobes: to expunge trans people from public life.
that's crazy they really secured the right to kick ANYONE out of a "woman's space" and said "it's not my problem if you can't go anywhere". so much for not being transphobic, they won't even give us "separate but equal"
mississippi is fuuuuuuucked (up):
Mississippians as young as 17 years old (for boys) and 15 years old (for girls) may get married. They may have a child and choose a name for that child. But the courts denied the name change request of SBM, a trans man with the full support of his parents in his transition, because they found 18 years old is not an adequate age to ensure “maturity” and warrant such a “life-altering” decision.
Unlike most states, Mississippi’s “age of majority,” or the age where the state recognizes someone as an adult, is 21, not 18. This means Mississippians under 21 years old cannot enter legally binding contracts in many instances, without parental sign-off.
...
In addition, it threatens to thrust Mississippians of all backgrounds into the epicenter of a constitutional crisis. The ruling and its rollout could call the 26th Amendment into question, which lowered the voting age to 18 after the mass conscription of young people during the Vietnam War. It also tests the Full Faith and Credit Clause, which requires states to respect the records-keeping of other states (such as name changes and marriage licenses); Mississippians’ 14th Amendment right to due process; and an individual’s First Amendment rights.
they didn't just override the trans boy but also his parents LMAO this is so fucked up
reminder that trans women are women and attraction to them (if you're a man) is straight
(i'm aware of the rest of your post but felt like this was a good thing to bring up)
was this not the state where two trans representatives flipped the anti trans bill? or was that somewhere else i'm forgetting?
really fucked that the principle called the daughter's personal cell phone about a personal instagram post at 10pm, this dude is a fucking creep
oh but when it's STRAIGHT puppets it's fine /s
(this may not be the point you were trying to make, but this is the internet, and it is a way your post can come across lmao)