1476
submitted 11 months ago by perishthethought@lemm.ee to c/tumblr@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] yamanii@lemmy.world 76 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

yeah, didn't work in brazil, we just opened up for the right to elect their dumbass just before the pandemic started, it was grim, please do vote for the lesser evil.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SuspiciousUser@lemmy.ml 66 points 11 months ago

My voting strategy is super easy. You don't need to keep up with politics or policy. Just see who the KKK is voting for and then vote for the other guy.

[-] Peddlephile@lemm.ee 22 points 11 months ago

As an outsider, it's really depressing to hear you only get two parties to choose from.

[-] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 16 points 11 months ago

We have to keep it forever though, because some dead slave owners thought up the perfect government, apparently.

[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 15 points 11 months ago

by far my favorite part about this is that thomas jefferson thought the constitution should be rewritten from scratch every 25 years but that hasn't stopped every conservative politician ever from treating it like gospel

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[-] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 55 points 11 months ago

You can hate all the candidates and still vote for the less shitty one.

[-] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 36 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

You can hate the concept of government in it's entirety and still vote. Even Lysander Spooner, a total anarchist, said as much in his writings. He said government is completely illegitimate, but there's nothing wrong with voting when you are forced into the system, and doing so does not imply your consent to the system. It's like a torturer asking you how you'd prefer to be tortured. It's OK to have an opinion. Over here in the USA, I'd rather suffer Sleepy Genocidal Joe than that fucking orange monster. Since we don't have ranked choice voting, I have to pick one or else I don't get any say at all, and that's exactly how the powers-that-be want it.

[-] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 17 points 11 months ago

Yep. Do you want a festering carbuncle on your ass or do you want AIDS, Ebola, leprosy and testicle cancer combined? Shitty choice but an easy one nonetheless.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net 54 points 11 months ago

Got it, should riot instead.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 35 points 11 months ago

You should.

You won't though.

[-] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 24 points 11 months ago

A riot on your own is just a tantrum. There's no point of you're not organised.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 16 points 11 months ago

Well that's the left fucked then.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jonne@infosec.pub 43 points 11 months ago

Agreed, that's why the strategy of voting uncommitted and/or third party is superior.

[-] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 19 points 11 months ago

Except it’s a primary where he’s running against himself basically.

That’s the point. It’s a primary, it’s not the general election. They’re showing up and saying “we’re your voters and you know what our message is.”

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Erika2rsis 31 points 11 months ago

Honestly sometimes I think every country should have its own Sinn Féin of sorts. Just a party that never takes its seats. Yeah, try calling it the "same thing" when you can't pass any legislation or form coalitions or get anything done because a third of the seats in the national legislature are literally left empty on purpose. Don't like it? Well, it's your problem that your party is literally less electable than No Representation!

[-] Tinidril@midwest.social 18 points 11 months ago

In the US that would almost literally be voting in Republicans. They want the system to crawl to a halt, and critical functions are legislated to frequently sunset so they can hold the system hostage on a regular basis.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ElderberryLow@programming.dev 31 points 11 months ago

If you can, please go vote. You give the vote up to the person you like the least if you don’t show up. I know this election sucks and the candidates aren’t the best. But is there someone you absolutely don’t want in office no matter what? I have one in mind and you better believe I’m showing up to vote for the only guy who can have a chance to keep him away. These other third party guys have no chance, like always. If you don’t show up to vote or vote third party as a throwaway, then don’t complain for the next four years.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] meep_launcher@lemm.ee 30 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

CGP Grey's Rules for Rulers spells out power structures in authoritarian and democratic countries really well.

If you vote, you are saying "I can support you, or I can support the other guy, but I will support someone" whereas not voting tells politicians you are politically useless, so they won't pay any attention to your needs.

It's a cynical way of looking at it, but if the no. 1 imperative for a politician is reelection, spending time doing things that will get you more votes is better than wasting time pleasing people who probably won't vote anyway.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 27 points 11 months ago

If somebody tells you not to vote, they know who you would have voted for and rather you didn't.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 26 points 11 months ago

That is only true in the undemocratic 2 party system of the US.

In places where they actually have multiple parties, say 10 or so at least. It is hard to not find a party that you like more than the others.

So if someone doesn't vote, it means none of the parties are good enough. Otherwise they would vote blank. And if too many people do not vote, it sends a clear signal to the government that they need to change something fast in order to prevent an uprising.

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 16 points 11 months ago

We need ranked choice voting. First past the post virtually guarantees a two party system.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world 26 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Whilst I'm not in US with it's Power Duopoly system, were I've lived I've always made a point of voting in the elections I can vote, and if none of the options appeals to me, I just vote blank.

Abstention out of principle does get mixed with abstention out of laziness, out of disconnect from politics or simply because of not being able to go vote, but a blank vote is a statement of "I did go to the trouble of going to vote just to register my dissatisfaction with all available options".

I've also been on the other side (manning a voting place) and I don't recommend spoiling your vote (if voting with a paper ballot) as whilst the people talling the votes will indeed see your beautiful artistic depiction of male genitalia or read your strongly worded message of disgust with the selection of candidates available, it won't go beyond them as in the tally it just gets mixed with people that incorrectly filled-in the ballot (such as multiple marks, marks significantly outside the box or, in the US, hanging chads).

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] themaninblack@lemmy.world 26 points 11 months ago

As a dual citizen with Australia:

Vote, vote, vote. You are disrespecting all hard-fought wons by marginalized groups throughout 200+ years of history.

Literally, the first voters in the country were land owning white men.

People died. So you could have a say.

You are disrespecting the dead, and denying you civic duty, and your obligation in the social contract, by not voting.

People should be disgraced and shunned for not voting. I do not care what your political beliefs are, even if they are odious or fickle or contrarian or uninformed to me.

Show up and cast your ballot you otherwise absolute disrespectful coward.

[-] GabrielBell12fi@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

So -- and I want to be clear about this -- to honour and respect those who fought and died for my right to vote, I should show up and put a cross next to the name of someone I think is a homophobic, transphobic, bigoted piece of shit just because she is less of a homophobic, transphobic bigoted piece of shit than the other person I could put a cross next to the name of?

To me that doesn't suggest I am showing any honour or respect to anyone. It just says that I am giving up every bit of my dignity, integrity and shame and that when I stand before my ancestors in the Halls of Judgement they will look at me and shake their heads in disgust.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 24 points 11 months ago

Low turnout doesn’t change their minds it makes them think they need to either go further to the center or that Americans are too lazy

[-] kameecoding@lemmy.world 34 points 11 months ago

Low turnout consistently favors republicans, that's why they do all they can to make it harder to vote, not going out to vote is basically for the republicans, who are at this point, basically a Fascist party.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago

The Democrats go further to the center no matter what, but they only win when they run to the left. Obama ran as a radical leftist that was going to deliver universal healthcare and hold the banks accountable, but jettisoned that as quick as he could. The truth is they just want to be in the center, and they'll justify it no matter the turnout or outcome of the election.

[-] meowgenau@programming.dev 31 points 11 months ago

Obama ran as a radical leftist

Do we live in the same reality?

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[-] Clubbing4198@lemmy.world 24 points 11 months ago

you realize this is talking about not voting in a PRIMARY, for a nomination he can't lose, right? tlaib is not suggesting that they don't vote in the general for biden. she is saying write uncommitted in the PRIMARY. personally I don't think that will pressure them enough. a large number of people denying biden a vote in the general might make them get the picture though.

[-] delaunayisation@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago

Yeah, it's absolutely ridiculous how easily people just accepted that primaries are just a joke, that the DNC can hold them when they want to and just decide on their own when they don't. Telling people to vote for Biden now, when he is not yet by any stretch an official candidate, is to forfeit a democratic right. They openly say they're ready to rubber-stamp a decision of party oligarchs.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Obi@sopuli.xyz 23 points 11 months ago

In France you can vote "blank" which is counted separately to absentees.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] hark@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago

The problem with guaranteeing your vote is that politicians take your vote for granted. They also take it as approval of their policies (like, you know, genocide).

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 16 points 11 months ago

They don't. No vote is taken for granted. We know this because every campaign has to do GOTV every election. If you ever worked a campaign you know that voters leaning your direction are very frustrating because they will agree with everything you say and then just not show up to vote.

People protest to make themselves feel better. If you lean left you can just call up Democrats in Congress and tell them how you feel. They will listen.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago

Damn, they should really have thought about that when picking their nominees

[-] olivebranch@lemmy.ca 20 points 11 months ago

It is however easier to explain to people that those in power do not have popular support if there are less people that voted for them. I am not saying it is a good idea, but I am trying to say that this goes both ways. As some user previously said, voting for lesser of two evils and voting for absolute support is also indistinguishable.

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] DessertStorms@kbin.social 20 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

No, the problem isn't not voting, it's only voting, a distinction those of you who are dedicated to doing the latter refuse to acknowledge.

It is people who look at the system and think that a tick in a box once every four years can or ever will change that system, but in actuality only maintains it, who are the ones who need to be rethinking their strategy. 🙄

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FreudianCafe@lemmy.ml 19 points 11 months ago

Its funny bc people from usa thinks this is smart

[-] NutWrench@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago

When your choices in an election are between "boring corporatists" and "100% concentrated evil" you don't have the luxury of sitting this election out with your adorable little "protest vote."

If authoritarians win the next election, you won't have to worry about voting ever again.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] letsgo@lemm.ee 18 points 11 months ago

To solve this, find out how to register a protest vote and do that. Not voting is ambiguous, as is spoiling your ballot paper. What you need is a formally recognised way to vote "None of the above" or something similar, so that your intent is 100% clear.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] vane@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

you should be able to vote :

  1. anytime
  2. for anyone in the country that have full citizen rights
  3. electronically - privately using your private key signed and acknowledged by gov
  4. over whole period you can change your vote anytime
  5. counting votes and reset should be every 4 - 5 years depending on terms
  6. before counting votes everyone should get notification one month, one week, one day before and only if you didn't vote hour, 15 minutes before counting
  7. if you didn't vote your voting account should be disabled and removed from pool until you pay the fine to bring it back.

that's all, let's bring the voting to 21st century lol

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Xanis@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

I'm currently in a discussion on here with a user who refuses to vote. Pointing out that Biden has done nothing and rule under Democrats has yielded zero change. All I want is for us to come together, vote Biden in, and then carry that momentum into his next term. Historically, us not on the Right have been rather poor at coming together for a goal. Republicans on the other hand act like rabid dogs until some smuck tosses a week old rancid steak in a direction and they all surge forward.

Course then it's back to infighting. Fuck me if it hasn't gotten us all to the point we're at now though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kaput@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

Make n"none of the above" a valid candidate. If it gets more thanx%, remove everyone, hold a new election. Rince and repeat until you get a clear winner.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
1476 points (100.0% liked)

tumblr

3580 readers
156 users here now

Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.

  4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

  5. No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.


Sister Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS