227
Donald Trump storms out of closing arguments in E Jean Carroll trial
(www.independent.co.uk)
How not to win over a jury: A true story, featuring Donald Trump
The art of fucking up the deal
It's a civil case, He didn't even have to be there in the first place lol.
Sure, but now he's open to contempt charges.
He'd be all excited to get the chance to show how persecuted and downtrodden poor Trumpy is. Maybe another photo of him looking all tough for his fan club to jack off over.
Like that picture where he looks like 3 toddlers standing on each other's shoulders?
Isn't that every picture?
I guess, yeah. There's one that came out recently where he looked especially ridiculous, but I can't find it right now.
People are saying that he shat his adult diaper. The best people. 🖐️👌
It's like drama and jackasserry are all this guy offers...fucking cult leader.
They always report hist theatrics. They don't report that he had no defense against the accusations.
Way to show dominance, Pumpkin Tits.
Pumpkins are way to plump and firm. Dude straight up has albino great-grandma orangutan tits. Shriveled, saggy and pointy.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Roughly 20 minutes after walking into the courtroom, Donald Trump stormed out of closing arguments in a civil trial to determine how much money he owes E Jean Carroll for repeatedly defaming her.
The former president arrived in federal court in Manhattan on Friday morning after briefly testifying in his defence on Thursday afternoon, after which he unleashed more attacks and potentially defamatory statements about the former Elle magazine columnist.
In her closing statement, Ms Carroll’s attorney Roberta Kaplan told jurors that the former president “acts as if these rules of law just don’t apply to him.”
The facts in the case have already been established, and Mr Trump is barred from disputing that he sexually abused her, leaving a trial focused exclusively on damages owed.
Mr Trump instead has used the trial to amplify his defamatory statements and as a stage for his campaign for the Republican presidential nomination, which has relied on his multiple lawsuits and criminal indictments to cast him as a victim of a baseless conspiracy theory of a weaponized justice system against him.
Hours before his appearance in federal court on Friday, he posted a video of himself to his Truth Social account in which he accused Ms Carroll of lying and being a paid political operative.
The original article contains 528 words, the summary contains 212 words. Saved 60%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Thanks bot. I refuse to click on independent’s garbage website.
Hey dumbass, storming out in a baby tantrum hasn't worked the last few times, maybe knock it off?
Maybe you shouldn't have raped her then, you sack of horse excrement
"Storms out" but actually, "waddles away diaperly"
No flourish?
this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
227 points (100.0% liked)
politics
18870 readers
3378 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS