74

LTT is incredibly corporate (+ a private jet??), Mrwhosetheboss is super AI-pilled (generated "hand painted" wallpaper of him and wife? Really?), Marques has his own controversies (e.g. exceeding highway speeds in a school zone, wallpaper app cashgrab, etc. + he does not seem to have any concept of value or budget), Gamers Nexus has their own problems (e.g. they claimed how Matrix could be Israeli spyware, with the source being a poorly received Reddit comment), etc.

Wendell from Level1Techs is still quite good and relatively out of controversy, perhaps because he doesn't target a general audience like the above? Veronica Explains (Linux and adjacent topics) and Jeff Geerling (primarily self-hosting and networking bits) are also great in their niches. Salem Techspurts (the greatest technician to ever live) and Hugh Jeffreys both cover topics relating to right to repair and they make interesting videos around vintage electronics as well!

Are there any other good tech creators that are not super corporate, not AI-pilled, and outside of controversy?

top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 47 points 2 weeks ago

Does Technology Connections count? He doesn’t really do cutting edge tech though.

[-] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

"This week: microwaves."

checks video length

48 minutes? wtf okay I'm curious

[-] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 weeks ago

This week: NO VIDEO

Last video: 1 month ago. Ceiling fans. Already watched.

You son of a bitch... Got my hopes up.

[-] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

Him, and CathodeRayDude were my immediate thoughts. Both are great, but neither do new stuff.

[-] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 39 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

You're describing a ridiculously wide swathe of tech topics.

I'm guessing you're going to tell me these people fail a purity test of yours, but content creators have to put out a LOT of content and it's very likely one of their videos will be off. The question is not if a creator makes a mistake or a bad call, but how they respond to it.

  • Right-to-repair: Louis Rossman
  • Anti-AI: Ed Zitron (better offline), the tech report
  • General mockery: SAMTime, occassionally Angela Collier
[-] littleomid@feddit.org 16 points 2 weeks ago

Based on this, I recommend electroboom.

[-] birdwing 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
[-] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 28 points 2 weeks ago

How about Technology Connections?

[-] Technologist@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago

GamersNexus' team pointed to multiple areas of concerns with various software.... The source was literally in the video and you can see donations and contributions on the Matrix project page. Their team also does anti-corpo content and is more tech journalism after the AI boom. In fact, out of all the ones you listed you liked, he is the most anti AI and anti Big Tech company channel, with rossman being a close 2nd but that depends what about AI you don't like.

Wendal also likes AI, but self hosted style instead of big corpo. He and Steve do videos together if you really paid attention.

If you like technicians with right to repair and ownership, the rossman is your man.

According to who you seem to side with, controversy is whoever you don't like (large channels), and controversy free is anyone you do (small channels)... Just let the algorithms help you out if you want outrage to be the basis for your consumption.

[-] ChaosMonkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 weeks ago

Here are some of my favorites in no particular order:

  • Jeff Girling
  • LaurieWired
  • The Serial Port
  • KRAZAM
  • Benn Jordan
  • Explaining Computers
  • No Boilerplate
  • Ben Eater
  • The Thought Emporium
  • GreatScott!
  • Engineer Bo
  • AlphaPhoenix
[-] Dultas@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

AlphaPhoenix is the only one I'm familiar with there. But he really does some wild stuff.

I also enjoy Applied Science for some really technical stuff.

[-] noxypaws@pawb.social 11 points 2 weeks ago

everyone is gonna fuck up at least a tiny bit over years-long careers like these.

I dislike Jeff Geerling for his past homophobic religious blog posts. And I haven't seen him apologize for them or make any sort of positive or supportive remarks about queer folks, ever, so I can only assume he still holds bigotry in his heart.

I adore Alec from Technology Connections. Maybe not the kinds of tech you're referring to, but he and his videos are SO good.

[-] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 3 points 2 weeks ago

Ohhh that makes sense... Somehow... about Jeff Geerling. He always felt off to me in a way I couldn't put my finger on. Guess now I have a proper reason not to watch him.

Also yes Alec is fantastic.

[-] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Is anything interesting happening in technology?

Seems like all the headlines are either AI related or consumer slop. So any creator following current news is going to struggle to stay relevant.

[-] SayJess 8 points 2 weeks ago
[-] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago
[-] SayJess 1 points 2 weeks ago

Optical media bad

[-] Dookieman12@piefed.social 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Bringus Studios. The entire channel is a treasure trove of information for hacking electronics.

Uwos Labs. Run by a former R&D guy. Not exclusively tech, but lots of good information.

Technology Connections remains as good as it's always been.

Project Farm is perhaps the most honest channel on YouTube. Any time I'm considering a new purchase, I check to see if they have a video on it.

Torque Test Channel is great if you're into tools and mechanics.

[-] FatVegan@leminal.space 1 points 2 weeks ago

Zach builds. I only really saw one video since i discovered him yesterday. But has huge bringus vibes without tge sillyneas. I really enjoyed it.

[-] ace_garp@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Mend it Mark

is like adorable, mealtime video, tech repairs.

An example fix of a Technics SL1210

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fF2usvWI6HU

[-] Grimdraken@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

That man is living his best life, and I'm here for it. I fucken love Mend it Mark.

[-] KiwiTB@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Wendel is big on AI and won't shut the fuck up about it.

[-] potustheplant@feddit.nl 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

People say that it's ok because he pushes for "local" ai. My brother in christ, local AI is expensive af and those models were also trained with unfathomable amounts of stolen data. How can anyone in their right mind support that?

[-] python@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago
[-] fistac0rpse@fedia.io 5 points 2 weeks ago

JamesChannel is great for gaming and electronics shenanigans

[-] reddfugee@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

LaurieWired does some interesting, if very niche, stuff on C++ programming techniques. I also enjoy some of Dave's Garage (thinking of his recent video on CAN Bus architecture); I don't love the generative graphics he sometimes uses but his lecture-style videos are very tightly-written and well-delivered. His interviews with Raymond Chen and Dave Cutler were great as well (and it's nice to hear about the days before Microsoft became a slop factory).

You might enjoy Cathode Ray Dude; he doesn't really do general tech videos (they're more like TechMoan, deep dives down unique rabbit holes), and his release cadence is definitely that of a one-man operation, but I really like his presentation style and depth of research.

[-] riskable@programming.dev 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

What does "AI-pilled" mean? Complaining about a generated wallpaper/cover image seems rather nitpicky to me when YouTube does that for everyone now. As in, that war has been lost.

In fact, complaining about AI-generated cover images in general seems rather nitpicky. The actual content wasn't AI generated, just a tiny little advertising detail.

I dunno: It's like people complaining about "kids these days." "Instead of spending a few hours working on a proper clickbait cover image, kids these days are using AI!"

[-] Dookieman12@piefed.social 14 points 2 weeks ago

"AI-pilled" means you.

[-] HereIAm@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Except thumbnail artists exists and can be incredibly meaningful to the success of a video. AI has stolen their work and now directly compete with them. It might be a small part of the whole production of a video, but theft still went in to the box, and less money for the working class comes out.

[-] riskable@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago

Don't call it theft. Theft is what happens when the original owner doesn't have that thing anymore.

Nothing was "stolen". AI just lowered the value of generic "thumbnail artists" and probably increased their value as artisans for those willing to pay for a premium service.

That's what generative AI does: It makes stuff of mediocre quality that's "good enough" for the masses. However, if you want something better than that, you have to pay a professional.

My hypothesis is that Baumol's Cost Disease combined with AI is going to result in the collapse of capitalism. Where bespoke service work (e.g. hiring a thumbnail artist) is going to become more expensive over time while generic stuff that doesn't need to be high quality is going to become cheaper and cheaper, to the point where it's basically free. We're almost there, actually.

[-] dosboy0xff@infosec.pub 1 points 2 weeks ago

It's not a term invented by critics of the AI craze, but rather proponents (who apparently don't realize just how insane it sounds). First time I heard it was when an enthusiastic coworker sent this article to me in an email. He was completely serious. Made some off-hand remarks that sounded borderline cultist about people who are "completely misguided" about AI. He's been sending out emails about AI for a couple years now and I realized that I've been watching a case AI psychosis gradually unfold.

[-] riskable@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Fermion@feddit.nl 4 points 2 weeks ago

This suggestion is probably out of scope, but I like most of Dr. Ian Cuttress' videos on "TechTechPotato."

He follows up and coming chip architectures and fab technologies.

Some of his content is blatantly sponsored though.

[-] Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
[-] lokalhorst@feddit.org 3 points 2 weeks ago
[-] jaschen306@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

I like Snazzylabs. He got me to 3D print my first planer headphones.

[-] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

All I watch is CRD and tech connections. Level headed smart folks.

[-] sbeak@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 weeks ago

Technology Connections is awesome! The man can make dishwashers and ceiling fans sound interesting

[-] trem 2 points 2 weeks ago

It's interspersed with left-wing politics and whatever they feel like, but various bits of Linux and small web topics here: https://video.thepolarbear.co.uk/a/chris/

[-] nibbs@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago

I enjoy apalrd very much, down to earth, deep dive, no bullshit explanatory videos mostly about networking.

[-] kugel7c@feddit.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

For normal tech review type stuff I've stumbled over MobileTechReview a couple of times and was never disappointed. Not thrilling no super in depth testing just information and video of the device in question.

[-] puppetx@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago
[-] KiwiTB@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

You've got to be kidding right.

[-] 123@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

Not yet mentioned I think, I find these useful:

Learn Linux TV: easy to follow tutorials of common Linux utilities, some distro videos, etc. Not too much sponsored stuff (or its clear).

YouSuckAtProgramming: small(er) channel about bash scripting and the like. No AI.

this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2026
74 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

49563 readers
354 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS