[-] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 hours ago

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents.

Surprised nobody's volunteered to write the English caption yet.

[-] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago

His passionate denial of being a Nazi leads me to think his belief in a total police state is sincere.

[-] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Well, the probably imprison less people because they are functioning much better as a society. The question is if imprisoning people is better than not imprisoning them in this fucked up society.

I'm in the US, but we generally lock up and/or deport way too many people; incarceration causes more problems than it solves, and serving white supremacy is the main social goal and outcoe.

But I think this is a separate conversation. The anti-gambling laws I'm talking about are the ones that would prevent constant Draft Kings advertisements and all the money that gets fed back into our political system. We've got so far away from acknowledging the damage that gambling causes, and gambling, as far as I'm concerned, is just a mugging with extra steps, yet paid propaganda has papered over the criminality.

[-] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I honestly wonder if there isn't a deeper history. Gambling is a part of human culture and the only recent thing that's happened is our society has become so corrupt that gambling is being allowed to legally flourish.

Like bank deposit insurance, vaccines, and clean water standards, anti-gambling laws are something society is reminded it needs only after they are gone.

[-] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

The weird trope is the hero that kills hundreds of henchmen but then refuses to kill the villain--the person most responsible for all these deaths--on ethical grounds.

At least Bats is consistent.

[-] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

Welp, time to reset my fingerprint... again.

[-] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Nice pin in the balloon, bro.

Submarines can swim underwater, too, just like humans. So if we put a plow on the bridge of a submarine and had it interface with an LLM, we'd basically have a super human.

[-] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 93 points 3 days ago

Is that really the best line? She has to leave to take advantage of it.

Maybe, “hey, how'd your husband's parole hearing go?”?

[-] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Are you counting the Eastern Empire? There's an argument that our view of “Rome” is obnoxiously Eurocentric. The economic lifeblood of the Empire was mostly outside of Western Europe, and lots of wheat from Egypt.

7

I'm interested in reading Borges. My spanish is good enough for conversation & podcasts, but in my experience, literature often requires an additional vocabulary that I, as an only occasional reader, will gain at high cost but benefit from little.

So the question is: is it better to read a translation that maybe mimics the lexical richness of the original in a different language, or is it better to read a simplified version in the native language? I don't mind grammatical complexity--which can be applied in conversation--it's mostly the vocabulary that's the problem.

Assume an actually advanced book that can be simplified.

Edit: Or maybe an e-reader with the original text and a built-in dictionary would be best? I just jailbroke my kindle.

7

I'm on day one of my third temp 7-day sitewide reddit ban this past year. Before that, I was a daily participator on reddit for over 10 years with no site-wide actions.

I thought it might be fun to share the story of my bans. Feel free to share yours.

The first one was for summarizing Bill Maher's views on fat women, old women, and transgendered people. This was understandably determined to be hate speech by the AI, but was upheld by human appeal.

The second one, I don't even remember clearly. I think I may have been criticizing Zionism on somewhere, probably a popular news subreddit. One thing you have to keep in mind is they delete the offending comment and so you have to guess at what your offense might be; then you only have 250 characters to defend yourself. The ban was done by AI. About five days after my seven-day ban ended, I got the notification: Your ban has been overturned. Thanks!

The third one just happened, so it's fresh in my memory. I wanted to talk about something I found crazy on one of my favorite TV shows: a black woman, mother of two black children and wife of a black man, who was in her 30s living the United States had her FIRST social justice epiphany--and it was about press freedoms in Guatamela. The post was shadowbanned. I commented on another thread, warning a user that the mods would come along soon to shadowban any comments on race. Both our comments were shadowbanned, and thereafter, I was perma-shadowbanned on that sub--any comment I made was immediately sent to the shadow realm.

I looked for discussion about the show's treatment of race (which would be interesting since the show did not--as the subreddit does--ignore the issue entirely) and found nothing more recent than 14 years ago. The sub had been wiped clean of any discussion of race on the show.

I wrote the mods and asked them to either a) lift my shadow ban or b) ban me permanently.

To make things easier for them, I also called them racist cowards. An hour later, I received my temp ban for bullying and harrassment.

My appeal simply laid out the facts: they objectively demonstrated both cowardice (by shadowbanning) and racism (for shadowbanning discussion on race) therefore it is not bullying to call them racist cowards. Any conversation forum that shadowbans members for conversing is obviously lost, and then further sitewide bans them for complaining, is clearly lost.

[-] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 16 points 4 days ago

I remember hearing about this exact case in New York State like 10 years ago. How long ago can you run this scam?

[-] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 41 points 4 days ago

Meanwhile, Kevin:

view more: next ›

schipelblorp

joined 5 days ago