[-] nibbs@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

Yepp. Both of them on the counter all the time. As it's a Mokkamaster and a Gaggia Classic, their foot print isn't that large and I don't have the room to put them away anyway.
Also, no spouse's opinion I have to consider. :)

If I were in your situation and had the room, I would most likely store the device and set a goal for myself to the tune of "If I'm not using it in 2/3/5 years, I'm selling that thing."

Enjoy your nice machine.

[-] nibbs@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 days ago

Hi, i think there's nothing wrong with having two different tools, that produce similar results in completely different ways and with differences in quality achieved.
I have an espresso machine mainly for my own enjoyment and a drip machine for guests. Sometimes I'll drink a cup from the drip machine when a guest is around I'm feeling like it.

Kids will grow up faster than you expect and with that comes a little bit alone time for the parents here and there. You may enjoy the fancier option than a lot. If not, you could sell it then?

[-] nibbs@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 days ago

Ich rippe alle gekauften Scheiben mit MakeMKV unter Windows oder Linux (Manjaro).
Funktioniert problemlos. Laufwerke sind relativ einfach zu unterscheiden:

  • Alles bis 1080p mit vielen Geräten oob möglich. Wenn einer:m das reicht, braucht man sich mit dem Thema LibreDrive nicht auseinandersetzen
  • LD geeignete und geflashte Laufwerke muss man haben, wenn man 4k rippen möchte. Das ist mit ein bisschen Recherche und 15 Minuten Arbeit getan, nach meiner Erfahrung.

Will man nicht selbst basteln, gibt es online "UHD friendly" Laufwerke zu kaufen. Werden nicht hinterher geworfen, aber das Angebot ist da.

Will man sich mit dem ganzen Geraffel nicht auseinandersetzen, gibt's auch andere Quellen:

  • mediathekviewweb.de Hat die meisten Sendungen und Filme des ÖPNV in einer durchsuchbaren Oberfläche zum direkten Konsum oder Download verfügbar. Teilweise auch OV.
  • BR in der Bibliothek ausleihen und rippen.
  • filmfreunde.de Streaming Service der öffentlichen Bibliotheken. Habe ich selbst nicht nicht genutzt, bietet afaik keinen Download.

Ich schließe mich dir grundsätzlich an, so wie es aktuell ist, ist es für die Meisten eine Qual. Da ich nicht sehe, dass es auf absehbare Zeit besser wird, gehe ich mit der Situation so um.

[-] nibbs@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 days ago

Oh, true. I've read so many infos about different services lately, that I must have confused that with something else.

Thank you.

[-] nibbs@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 days ago

Thank you for the very comprehensive write up.

Authentication will be my very next project after I solved another minor problem I've become aware of just yesterday.

It's at least the second time, someone mentioned Anubis in this thread.
I've checked the site but have to do further digging about the concept. Mostly because "AI" isn't something I adore that much, but that's a me problem. :)

[-] nibbs@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago

Thanks for the suggestion, I will take a look at Anubis.

There are no SSH ports open to external, as everything I run is locally in my LAN, I do not have use for externals SSH access and don't want to open that vector.

The services that I (want to) offer to the family, are the common selfhosters finest:

  • immich
  • Stirling PDF
  • Jellyfin

As I do not have a authentication provider yet, the services which require an authentication by user/password are prone to brute force attacks, I want to mitigate that first and foremost.
In the mid to long run, I plan to also deploy an authentication provider for those services like Authelia, TinyAuth, PocketID, Authentik or .
As there are so many of them and the opinion of which is best differ wildly, I have not yet decided and am in kind of a analysis paralysis. :)

[-] nibbs@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago

Thank you for bringing that up, I was wondering that too. As in: "This one has something to hide. Let's poke harder."

Did you try CrowdSec as someone else suggested? Could that be a mitigation as those IPs could be filtered out in the long run, if I understand the concept of CS correct?

[-] nibbs@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Thank you for suggesting the region block on Unifi, that's a good tip.

I have that previously set in place globally under settings -> security -> protection -> region blocking.
So on a less sophisticated level and not as granular as you.
Yours seems to be much better and I will take a look at it later. At the moment I have way too many ideas and projects boiling, to add yet another one... ;)

[-] nibbs@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

Thanks for bringing it up.

Before I dove into that project, I was checking logs on npm and the service I am already exposing. It seems to me, both only get http GET requests which on npm all get a 404 response.
I don't remember what the service does with those, but I will investigate later. As I didn't panicked, I guess it wasn't that bad.

There are basically no brute force attacks on the service yet and the admin account is only allowed to login from internal IPs.

One initial aspect to further harden the exposed systems were the logs in the UDM which show frequent blocked attempts of varying severity.
This may be security theater and I am not able to assess whether the UDM is a "good enough" protection of the most common attacks.

As I see it, at the moment the UDM already blocks most of the (more sophisticated) attacks and leaves only common requests for the services to handle.

Long story short, as I see it, the UDM has the role of ingress server in my setup.

[-] nibbs@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

Thank you very much for your input. I will look into the third option.
Thought of it, but did forget it over tinkering the last few days. :)

40
submitted 1 week ago by nibbs@lemmy.zip to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

Hi there, I am hosting a service for mainly me and also some family members. I want it to become more.

Currently the chain just as follows: interwebz <-> UDM <-> npm <-> services. The services are mostly run in VMs or LXCs, npm runs in docker, accompanied by one Adguard home instance and another AGH instance in an LXC.

I now want to add f2b to this whole chain. I've installed f2b in the OS which runs docker (and therefore npm) (VM1) and also in the OS of my existing service (VM2). Both VMs use Ubuntu as their OS.

What I already figured out thru testing and reading is, that f2b in VM2 acts as expected when the jail is triggered, and sets the block. But nftables/ufw don't block connections coming from external, as they are coming thru npm. f2b sees and uses the public IP for the checks/bans.

So now I am thinking how to solve that.

  1. Keep f2b on VM2 and let it set the bans on VM1 over SSH. That's what some people do or so I've read.
  2. Use f2b on VM1, let it check logs on VM2 and then set the bans. That would also be possible over SSH, I'd guess. But I didn't read up on it yet.

So, what's your opinion? How do you fine folks handle that in your environment? Option 2 seems to be more elegant, as it would be "at the entry" and let's me easily add additional services later. But I don't know, if that's a path worth digging in to.

[-] nibbs@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Angefangen habe ich mit no-ip oder so, dann duckduckdns, jetzt bei dynv6.com. Sind alle kostenlos. Der große Vorteil bei dyn6 ist, dass man nur dass Präfix (2003:1:2:3::) per Script übergeben und für Subdomains nur den Interface Identifier (::4:5:6:7) angeben muss. Daraus wird dann die ganze ipv6 gebaut (2003:1:2:3:4:5:6:7) womit sich Dienste gezielt ansprechen lassen. IPv4 geht natürlich auch.

Die Wechsel habe seinerzeit durchgeführt, weil ich immer wieder Probleme hatte, interne Dienste zu erreichen. Ursache war natürlich eigene Dummheit (Portweiterleitungen falsch).

[-] nibbs@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago

I enjoy apalrd very much, down to earth, deep dive, no bullshit explanatory videos mostly about networking.

view more: next ›

nibbs

joined 3 weeks ago