231
submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by InterestingUsername@lemmy.ml to c/mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 54 points 5 days ago
[-] huppakee@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago

Fitting logo, if they sold mid-range kitchen appliances...

[-] spankinspinach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago

No no you misunderstood the rebrand. Now they do high-end appliances!

[-] SharkWeek 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Could have called this the moment they started selling diesels and estates (station wagons to the Americans) ... that was the start of dilusion of the brand.

Edit: In other news, how about that Lotus / Lamborghini / Aston Martin mid size sport SUV? Pretty neat for taking your kids to school, wouldn't you say?

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 5 days ago

Didn't Lamborghini start out making tractors?

[-] SharkWeek 1 points 4 days ago

They still do, beautfil utilitarian tractors ... none of this SUV shite.

[-] FirmDistribution@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

corny ass new logo

[-] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 32 points 5 days ago

I hate this. And presumably this is happening because some sort of market research consumer psychology findings show this is preferable and leads to more sales. Which somehow makes me hate it even more.

[-] ColdWater@lemmy.ca 18 points 5 days ago

Just like their CEOs, soulless and bland

[-] mrodri89@lemmy.zip 14 points 5 days ago

I gotta say I think I thought about this once for just 5 seconds but at the same time I don’t give a fuck. Most of them polute the Earth at extraordinary rates. Doesnt matter what kind of decoration you put on them. I think they’re all pretty gross.

[-] InterestingUsername@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 days ago
[-] echodot@feddit.uk 21 points 5 days ago

The absolute worst one is Kia's new logo. However they have managed to go in the opposite direction and make the logo even less clear than it already was.

[-] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I’d argue that the HP stripe logo is just as bad:

The KIA logo always reads as “KN” to me, but at least I can fucking read it. The first time I saw the new HP logo I legitimately didn’t know what I was looking at. lip? lili? lqi? lgi? I basically always end up reading it as “lip” instead of “hp”.

[-] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago

MIT did it correctly, and a long time ago.

Though they redefined the colors to only be monochromatic, no more gray i

[-] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 15 points 5 days ago

The new Kia logo looks like they slanted the nine inch nails logo and called it a day.

[-] FrChazzz@lemmus.org 8 points 5 days ago

I drive a 2017 Kia Soul EV and it still has the old logo and I love it. I love that it is a boring, no-nonsense logo. Just straightforward. KIA. No pretense.

Now it’s КИ (sorry if Cyrillic doesn’t show up on your device)

[-] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago

I always read them as KN.

Probably the worst logo in the industry.

[-] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago

Isn't that their old logo too? I dont know why they changed from the recent logo. Their current (and possibly old) logo just screams "cheap car" to me.

[-] 3abas@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

You mean that new car market no one has ever heard of, KN?

[-] Nindelofocho@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Ya, Kia Notors

[-] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Technically these aren’t logos, they’re wordmarks (AKA “logotypes”).

[-] saltnotsugar@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago

Roll three D6’s, scroll down to see what font to use, type out company name, make 50 dolla.

[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 days ago

Cra, bankrupted the company because we rolled Natural 1s...Wingdings.

[-] napkin2020@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 days ago
[-] JennaR8r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

When one guy in the marketing department only has one job to overthink updating the logo (font) for no reason and nobody notices the change because it's negligible and that guy keeps receiving the same salary every year no matter what, so it really doesn't matter.

[-] joyjoy@piefed.social 15 points 5 days ago

You don't have to pay a graphic designer if you just pick a random font.

[-] Footer1998@crazypeople.online 11 points 5 days ago

wish this image was in color, would be even more interesting

[-] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 9 points 5 days ago

Google is the only one who was always just a standard font. Maybe they started that shit?

YvesSaintLaurent is a fucking disappointment. I hate that company, and it was always so recognizable, it was easy to direct my hate. Now - meh.

But as much as I hate the trend - these are only 16 of probably thousands of recognizable brands.

[-] JennaR8r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

I don't recall airbnb & Spotify with those old whimsical logos.

[-] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 1 points 2 days ago

Apparently they had them 2010-2014 and until 2008 respectfully.

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 days ago

The source for this is actually a good read. Why do AI company logos look like buttholes?

[-] helvetpuli@sopuli.xyz 4 points 5 days ago

Remember when we used to worry about paper weight and surface for our CVs?

[-] FrChazzz@lemmus.org 2 points 5 days ago

[Faye Dunaway, screaming] NO SERIFS EVAAARRRR!!!

[-] sturmblast@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

This is what happens when you sell your soul

this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2026
231 points (100.0% liked)

Mildly Interesting

26756 readers
247 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS