451
submitted 2 months ago by Sunshine@piefed.ca to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.ca
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 89 points 2 months ago

I don’t see the big deal, everyone in the world was born on 1 Jan 1900, right?

[-] Unleaded8163@fedia.io 93 points 2 months ago

Umm... I was born 1-Jan-1970 at 0:00 UTC.

[-] dsilverz@calckey.world 16 points 2 months ago

@pennomi@lemmy.world @Sunshine@piefed.ca @politicalmemes@lemmy.ca

There's the big deal (already a thing in the country I exist in):

Text "With a bill ready to force online ID checks"

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

How will they force online checks using an operating system you own? You can just have the OS lie.

Besides if you’re living in a country with that level of surveillance, you should already be on a VPN regardless.

[-] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

Oh, that's simple. Just have the law require all end user OSes to have government-verified ID check functionality that is out of the user's control and the integrity of it protected by Secure Boot.

Accessing any online service with an operating system capable of manipulating or bypassing the check will be considered some flavor of hacking or fraud.

Boom, done. All the privacy activists go into the slammer and Microsoft gets to sell a new version of Windows to everyone.

[-] CaperGrrl79@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago

I genuinely feel sick to my stomach. That would completely end my life. No joke.

[-] DannyMac@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago

Yup, this is why I'm not sleeping right now!

[-] dsilverz@calckey.world 15 points 2 months ago

@pennomi@lemmy.world @politicalmemes@lemmy.ca

How will they force online checks

In case of Brazil, it'd be through the full power of the corpo-state full with regulatory agencies, judiciary, financial system, and police force.

Either companies and platforms comply, or the telecommunication agency (ANATEL, Agência Nacional de Telecomunicações) would simply subpoena all Brazilian ISPs to block IP addresses and DNS entries, alongside the courts applying daily fines for disobedience shall those have any Brazilian bank accounts.

Big corps such as Google and Meta and Apple, with enough money to burn on Persona and au10tix KYC services, won't even be needed to be forced to comply: they got a fresh golden goose of tracking data!

It's the small companies and orgs who'll either: go bankrupt trying to get the KYC on their systems, cease activities altogether, geoblock Brazilian users, or going the Non Serviam way with the risk of having the wrath of the state.

As for the end user, the whole weight of this conundrum between state + big corps + cheerleading herds of complying citizens vs any company and org who dares not to comply will push them into compliance, because we live in a sick world where one must have a damn smartphone to be allowed to "live in society". Brazil heavily rely on digital payments ("Pix") and many things have been digital-only since the COVID-19 pandemics.

Dissidents such as me, who managed to convince themselves of a quasi-Luddite way of life, the item "living in society" ruled out from "living plans card", well, who knows what will happen? I got no money for them to seize because I've been long unemployed, no belongings to get auctioned, nothing I could lose, except for the reminiscent illusion of mundane freedom which is not being inside a jail yet...

just have the OS lie.

Even if the OS and browser managed to trick apps and websites with fake KYC authorization tokens, that would be illegal.

you should already be on a VPN regardless.

Before this law existed, there's precedent for past legal decisions where VPN was explicitly prohibited by Supreme Court, and people were somehow discovered using VPN (packet sniffing from ISPs, I guess) and were fined for doing so (not mere "you owe to the State": banks are subpoenaed to lock assets, and the fines get autopaid).

Also, if we zoom out and look at the forest, it's spreading worldwide. If enough countries pass their flavors of this "age validation", eventually there'll be nowhere left for a VPN to circumvent anymore. VPNs must be in some country to operate.

I mean, don't get me wrong: I'm not complying, I'm currently using an outdated Linux on an old laptop, I haven't updated for a while (thing is expected to get at the OS level) so I won't have any age check mechanism anytime soon on PC. But I know how it'll eventually get me one way (coercion by social comformity) or the other (coercion by force).

Maybe I'm exaggerating, I don't know... This world is truly depressing.

[-] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago

You would need an ID reader or something, but you could generate a key from scanning your ID, and have that used to authenticate on major online platforms. This is basically how most companies manage network access, so all the essential technology is widely available.

[-] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

The key still identifies you wherever you go.

[-] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 months ago

Yes, that is kind of the intended outcome of having a key.

[-] Asetru@feddit.org 3 points 2 months ago

Missing the point entirely.

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I totally disagree with surveillance and age control. It’s total nanny state bullshit.

But that wasn’t the point of my comment. I’m drawing attention to the fact that the laws they made are stupid because they are fundamentally unenforceable nonsense, just like “age verification” techniques have been since long before computers even existed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] nik282000@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

Until California makes a law about providing fake birthdays. This should never have got this far.

FUCK THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

[-] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 82 points 2 months ago

As a non-American, I am not doing this. Even if it's just one extra click, I'm not going out of my way to do anything just because a handful of US States decided to pass some idiotic law. If I'm forced to spend any effort at all on this, it'll be to disable it. If some websites require me to have it enabled to function, I will just stop using them. Enough is enough with this shit.

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago

American here. I vote for you for president.

Yeah, I don't even know your name, but....well look what we got now. You've already shown in that one post, that you'll be a better leader than anything else we have going today. I'll take the risk. How could it possibly be any worse, ya know?

[-] CaperGrrl79@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 months ago

I get your sentiment, but never ask how it can get worse. It can.

[-] TootSweet@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

Thank you for your solidarity with us Americans. I don't live in California, but I don't think it's less likely to affect me by virtue of not living in California.

[-] Sunshine@piefed.ca 39 points 2 months ago

Linux grew too fast. We have all these windows kiddies defending this overreach.

[-] j4k3@lemmy.world 55 points 2 months ago

All bots. No sane human wants this

[-] marcos@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago

Propaganda makes a lot of people insane. I know people that support this.

[-] MissesAutumnRains 10 points 2 months ago

I wouldn't downplay how many people are genuinely convinced this is a good idea.

[-] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 months ago

Don't need bots once the propaganda takes a hold

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Too fast??? It was started in like 1992. It's been the slowest growth I've ever seen! I hadn't even heard of it until 2006!

[-] Hexarei@beehaw.org 4 points 2 months ago

Imagine being used to a centralized authority over what your computer does smh

[-] silverneedle@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 months ago

I understand why people dislike SystemD now

[-] scintilla@crust.piefed.social 13 points 2 months ago

Man don't make me learn something else to start avoiding systemd. Its just so much more convenient than the alternatives.

[-] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 9 points 2 months ago

Got root ? You'll be fine for quite a while.

[-] CaperGrrl79@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago
[-] silverneedle@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago

OpenRC is really not that bad.

[-] scintilla@crust.piefed.social 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Its not, I was using it when I ran Gentoo, but its substantially more present if that makes sense. When I'm using systemd I don't have to think about it when I'm configuring my system in normal circumstances but with openrc it's always something that had to be accounted for.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago

That's exactly why we adhere to Unix philosophy.

If software does too much it's harder to replace.

[-] bootleg@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

https://nosystemd.org/#alternatives
For Arch users: Artix with dinit is the easiest to switch to without getting a headache, as dinitctl commands are really similar to systemctl commands, package names are pretty much identical to Arch Linux, and AUR works (but you will have to find the dinit scripts for those AUR packages that have a system service).

[-] thorhop@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 months ago

It is now legally mandated - by shit lords and trolls of any age - to set their age to 67, 69, even 420.

[-] merdaverse@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 months ago
[-] RamenJunkie@midwest.social 3 points 2 months ago

I think there was a comment once from Steam about how some rediculously high nimber of users were "born" on Jan 1st.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

You're one thousand three hundred thirty seven years old?

[-] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

I'll be rounding out my eighty-thousand and eighty fifth year here in june.

[-] Patrikvo@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago

You don't see that one much these days. 1n my day5 1t wa5 3v3ryw3r3.

[-] Stonewyvvern@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

54m3 h3r3...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MNByChoice@midwest.social 11 points 2 months ago

I do wonder what happens with system accounts and servers. But I know it will be a patchwork of laws so the answer will change depending on the patch of ground it is on, and solutions and none of it will work correctly.

[-] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Someone will definitely pass a law that will make it effectively impossible to legally operate a server and then be all surprised when companies threaten to move their datacenters elsewhere.

[-] root@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

systemd has already reverted this rogue commit/ merge

Edit: after following up, the PR I had seen was closed, not merged. This is still live.

[-] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Not true, looking at systemd main branch shows the field still exists. Here's the state as of posting this comment:

https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/494c65236b19e160ade48315edfa0f089f3d4154/man/homectl.xml#L370

Also ping @Gonzako@lemmy.world fyi

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ComicalMayhem@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Man I hate learning news from memes because it doesn't always get the full picture and I'm too stupid to know where to get the full picture.

[-] Smaile@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Leave america for somewhere saner

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 months ago

I can only imagine that somewhere, there is an incredibly anti-systemd person screaming I told you! I told ALL OF YOU!!!

Either that or they gave up on that a while back and already switched to BSD.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2026
451 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

2449 readers
700 users here now

Non political memes: !memes@sopuli.xyz

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS