[-] TootSweet@lemmy.world 1 points 15 minutes ago

Yeah, ok. I'll concede Betterhelp too.

[-] TootSweet@lemmy.world 1 points 17 minutes ago

Exactly. Day 2. ;)

[-] TootSweet@lemmy.world 25 points 5 hours ago

Firefox, Plex, and VPNs I can understand being surprised about. But the rest of them... I mean of course they were going to milk you for money. Was there ever a time when any of those didn't?

[-] TootSweet@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

"Eat this if you want to live."

[-] TootSweet@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

Hold my beer.

[-] TootSweet@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

And throw in a side of pork belly.

[-] TootSweet@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago

Maybe they matched the donut placement to the sign. Did you ever think of that?

[-] TootSweet@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Yes. If there's any one thing that pisses me off about the latest "AI" bubble, it may be that... AI has been around for decades, and has been useful for decades while this "GenAI" scam BS is taking center stage.

I took a course in college named "Introduction to Artificial Intelligence" in like 2005. In that course, I learned about the A* algorithm which is used among other purposes by games to let NPC's navigate from point A to point B potentially around obstacles or over terrain of different passability. That shit is genuinely useful and bears no resemblence to LLMs or Stable Diffusion. And yet it was called "AI" back in... like the 1960s and was still called "AI" in 2005. Probably still is in college courses around the world.

Now, I haven't read the article, but I'd have to hope nobody put too much blind faith in the AI's output here. But the right tools in the hands of sufficiently well-educated scientists, be they called "AI" or not, can certainly assist in things like drug development.

Oh, also, you can call just about anything that's done with code "AI" even if it really has nothing to do with artificial intelligence. My employer was fairly recently sold an automated customer service tool by a big, well-known software vendor that another team I work distantly with had to configure/program, every step from soup to nuts. (There was absolutely no machine learning involved or anything like that. This other team had to decide all the flows the customers could go through.) But you can bet your ass you couldn't read any three consecutive words in any of their marketing materials about it without at least one of the three being "AI".

I'm sure there are microwave ovens no more sophisticated than the one I have (spoiler: it's the dumbest microwave oven I could find) that are being marketed with the term "AI".

[-] TootSweet@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago
52
[-] TootSweet@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Please pan down so I may behold the face of my spirit animal.

[-] TootSweet@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Wake me up when I can hack it.

[-] TootSweet@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago

So, the DOJ released a memo saying basically that there isn't a list and Epstein killed himself. Why are the MAGAts changing their tune now? Is it because if the DOJ said it and Trump is currently at the helm, then (by their logic) Trump must approve of downplaying the whole "Epstein list" thing?

49
5
Spamtec - I'm a DG (www.youtube.com)
13
1
2
Beefy - Sidekick (www.youtube.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by TootSweet@lemmy.world to c/nerdcore@lemm.ee
2
YTCracker - I Am A Pirate (www.youtube.com)
submitted 3 weeks ago by TootSweet@lemmy.world to c/nerdcore@lemm.ee
3
MC Chris - IG-88 (www.youtube.com)
submitted 3 weeks ago by TootSweet@lemmy.world to c/nerdcore@lemm.ee
2
YTCracker - Wind Song (www.youtube.com)
submitted 3 weeks ago by TootSweet@lemmy.world to c/nerdcore@lemm.ee
3
Beefy - Table Top (www.youtube.com)
submitted 1 month ago by TootSweet@lemmy.world to c/nerdcore@lemm.ee
3
YTCracker - Meganerd (www.youtube.com)
submitted 1 month ago by TootSweet@lemmy.world to c/nerdcore@lemm.ee
12
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by TootSweet@lemmy.world to c/pathfinder2e@lemmy.world

I've GM'd D&D 5e and Pathfinder 1e. My last campaign was in D&D 5e, but I... hope folks here know why I'm reticent to continue patronizing Hasbro. Anyway!

I wanted to get some of the core-est of the PF2e rulebooks. But... I'm confused. Looking for the PF2e "core, prime, base, main, starting" rulebook (the nearest equivalent of the PF1e "Core Rulebook" or the D&D 5e "Player's Handbook"), I've got at least the following options:

I think I don't want the "Core Rulebook". It sounds like it's just an older, more poorly-organized version of largely the same content that's in... one of the other options. It sounds like the "Player Core 2" in fact is not a newer edition of the "Player Core", but more of an "expansion" for whatever the core rules are (a bit like the PF1e "Advanced Player's Guide" maybe?) so I probably don't want that if I'm really just looking to get familiar with the core rules first.

So assuming the previous paragraph is mostly correct that leaves the "Player Core Remastered" and the "Player Core Pocket Edition". I... think the "Player Core Remastered" is hardback and... maybe only sold as part of a bundle like this one? The "Player Core Pocket Edition" appears to be only in paperback. Is the "Pocket Edition" not as "Remastered" as the "Remastered" version? (Does "Remastered" just mean it's a newer edition than the "Core Rulebook"?) Does the "Pocket Edition" have all the same content as "Remastered" or does "Pocket Edition" mean it's missing some of the content?

All of the above isn't even to mention digital vs dead-tree versions. But I'm specifically looking for physical copies for purposes of this post.

view more: next ›

TootSweet

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF