[-] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

So, you're saying it's possible?

[-] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Use nix run/nix shell and only add to the config when you've used that a lot for the same command.

Then clean up the config....someday.

[-] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The Watt-hour (Wh) rating may not exceed 20 Wh for a lithium ion cell or 100 Wh for a lithium ion battery.

The difference between cells and batteries is that you have to have multiple lithium cells to make a battery.

Edit: this is around 25000 mAh

[-] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

They also say this:

In the absence of relevant standards and until the publication of the references of the relevant harmonised standards in the Official Journal of the European Union, the transitional testing methods set out in Annex IVa, or other reliable, accurate and reproducible methods, which take into account the generally recognised state-of-the-art methods, shall be used.

So I remain hopeful.

[-] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

Apparently not

the new labels is tested using the same software used by many tech reviewers: SmartViser. This French automation company works with labs and manufacturers to simulate real-world usage. So now, the battery performance you see on the label is based on consistent, lab-tested data, not just marketing claims.

Source

[-] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Not sure how to go about marketing that in our current disposable society, though.

Ditto. The most likely solution would be EU regulations forcing longer battery life/better battery safety. Maybe the new law for replaceable batteries in smartphones could be enough, it includes a rating on charging cycles which could be the new "muh number is bigger!"

[-] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Why would they? AFAIK it's less power density for safety gain - which is hard to market. The only way I see it happening is if we find a safer and denser storage medium or if laws force safer batteries.

33
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by InnerScientist@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

I'm looking for experiences and opinions on kubernetes storage.

I want to create a highly available homelab that spans 3 locations where the pods have a preferred locations but can move if necessary.

I've looked at linstore or seaweedfs/garage with juicefs but I'm not sure how well the performance of those options is across the internet and how well they last in long term operation. Is anyone else hosting k3s across the internet in their homelab?

Edit: fixed wording

[-] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 68 points 4 months ago

If I had a nickel for every time someone thought of boiling pasta by showering with it piercing their nipple, I'd have two nickels-- which isn't a lot, but it's weird that it happened twice.

[-] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 289 points 4 months ago

That's why I bake my cake at 2608°C for ~1,8 minutes, it just works™

[-] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 63 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Our Database

[-] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 59 points 8 months ago

I'm just waiting for the EOL of window 10 to see which of the following will happen:

  1. Many PCs will stop getting updates, people don't care
  2. Many PCs will be replaced for windows 11
  3. Turns out people already have replaced their PCs due to other reasons
  4. Microsoft removes the hardware requirements
  5. People switch to another OS
  6. People just don't buy a home PC anymore
  7. ????
  8. Profit???
view more: next ›

InnerScientist

joined 2 years ago