506
Dear Faith II (mander.xyz)
all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de 186 points 2 months ago

I feel unable to judge without seeing the actual table.

[-] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 75 points 2 months ago

Pastels: could be tasteful

Neon: what happened to your eyes?

[-] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 34 points 2 months ago

Yeah.

I usually colour code tables to draw attention to key areas.

[-] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 months ago

I do it all the time at work as an engineer. Red/bold for bad numbers, green/bold for good numbers. Maybe orange/bold for mixed bag

[-] Vlyn@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago

Red/green isn't really a good combination due to color blindness. Either go blue/orange or at least add icons like ↑ and ↓ next to it.

[-] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

or at least add icons like ↑ and ↓ next to it.

C# in Excel can't even properly pull values from a table correctly. No way I'm going to waste 2-3 trying to make it concatenate non-alphanumeric characters into cells.

At work, there isn't anyone I have to send tables to that is colorblind. And if that changes, they can make a request. Until then, I'm sticking with red/green

[-] Vlyn@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago

C# in Excel

What is this abomination you speak of? Are you creating your reports by going C# into Excel? O.o

[-] djmikeale@feddit.dk 13 points 2 months ago

Imagine this, but in a word doc:

[-] perishthethought@piefed.social 2 points 2 months ago

Oooh. I use Rainbow Tables CSV extension in VS Code too. It's a great help!

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Yeah. My conditional formatting makes some of my Excel tables look like I'm defragging my harddrive.

[-] dumbass@piefed.social 59 points 2 months ago
[-] eestileib 11 points 2 months ago

They can't even have a pile of baking soda and some baggies?

[-] dumbass@piefed.social 2 points 2 months ago

THE APA drank beer and kicked ass, they didnt need any illicit drugs to do that. Pure Spite and booze fueld them.

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 48 points 2 months ago

Well, rainbow tables are really valuable in certain disciplines, just not those rainbow tables

[-] zqwzzle@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

What if they’re rainbow coloured rainbow tables? (The thought that someone would print out rainbow tables for their thesis is slightly amusing)

[-] Tja@programming.dev 11 points 2 months ago

Well, for when you're 300 pages short and you add an appendix...

[-] newtraditionalists@kbin.melroy.org 39 points 2 months ago

Seeing "Why!" makes my brain angry lol

[-] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 months ago

Why, land sakes! What has your jimmies rustled?

[-] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 37 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

A friend once received an email riddled with misspellings and grammatical errors from her boss that critiqued her (appropriate) use of exclamation points. Specifically, that appearing cheerful was not professional.

Some people just like to be miserable.

[-] Zacryon@feddit.org 35 points 2 months ago

Not using colors in scientific writing is discarding a valuable information channel and therefore inefficient. When you are already limited in the allowed word count, this can speed up conveying information and reduce cognitive strain on readers (and possibly yourself). So it's a win-win.

This should not end in chaos though, where colours are more confusing than helpful.

The times when we had to print out each and every single page on a crappy black/white office printer are luckily becoming more and more a thing of the past. So even this is no longer a good reason to not use colours.

[-] erev@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

Be sure to be careful and thoughtful in your color palette though because if colors are important to the understanding of information then it should be accessible.

[-] nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 2 months ago

There's nothing wrong with rainbow tables. Printing them sounds a bit excessive, though.

[-] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 22 points 2 months ago

I've only ever been academia adjacent and I'm glad. Some of the most soulless people I've ever met. It's the lab grunts who know how to party. Until they have the life sucked out of them to meet some arbitrary writing spec for a journal

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 20 points 2 months ago

Faith, what are you doing? Rainbow Tables are for the CS class!

[-] etchinghillside@reddthat.com 19 points 2 months ago

I’m beginning to think Faith shouldn’t have chosen higher education.

[-] deliriousdreams@fedia.io 41 points 2 months ago

Because it can't accept her avant garde use of color to facilitate learning? Because Faith is ahead of her time? Because she is a pioneer?

[-] Broadfern@lemmy.world 37 points 2 months ago

What is her crime? Enjoying a table? A colorful, rainbow table?

This is education manifest!

[-] ol_capt_joe@piefed.ee 11 points 2 months ago

Did the colors in question lack adequate succulency?

[-] Dojan@pawb.social 10 points 2 months ago

I have full faith in her. Faith did nothing wrong!

[-] morto@piefed.social 4 points 2 months ago

Faith in Faith

[-] Ratio_Tile 4 points 2 months ago

I do think a rainbow table would be welcome in Elementary Ed

[-] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 months ago

Haven't been able to locate the definitive source, but there are several of these out there with Faith and Professor Kutaywa.

Believe it originates somewhere on LinkedIn, but very rare for a LinkedIn meme to escape the platform.

[-] RunJun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 months ago

I understand that colors can color, heh, our perceptions but being a primarily visual animal means that we can digest information much quicker through color.

Without seeing the charts, I can’t say if the Prof is just being a curmudgeon or not.

[-] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Clearly fake - no-one puts first supervisor in their email signature!

[-] Lumidaub@feddit.org 10 points 2 months ago
[-] dandelion 40 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

the context is all there ... Faith is a graduate student working on their masters thesis, in the thesis paper they included tables that they presumably color-coded (maybe different columns had different colors), and they used multiple colors such that it was "rainbow colored".

Apparently the thesis advisor did not like the presence of color and advises using APA guidelines on how to style & format the tables: https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/tables-figures/tables

[-] taiyang@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Interestingly your link doesn't mention use of color or lack there of. It does say elsewhere that you shouldn't do it for decoration, though.

That said, things like this are more dictated by the journal you publish to and a thesis has to imitate that. Solution? Graduate and start a journal that requires beautiful color tables, lol

[-] dandelion 7 points 2 months ago

yeah, I think the email is probably fake and made for internet points / humor

I have heard horror stories about how specific formatting has to be for a thesis or dissertation, though - and often those rules are very specific to a particular university or even department. So it's also possible for rules like that to be local and not from a universal standard like the APA guide.

[-] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

yeah, I think the email is probably fake and made for internet points / humor

Eh, you'd be surprised at how far some people will go to criticize women in STEM fields. It's not everyone, and I doubt it's even a majority, but there's enough that I wouldn't be surprised if this is true.

Or maybe the OOP is a mathematical Lisa Frank. Idk

[-] dandelion 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

no denying that people criticize women in STEM (as a woman in STEM myself), but there are series of "dear Faith" email posts that collectively seem a bit unlikely in their tone and situation, which is what makes me think it's more likely they're fake than real

that said, this particular email seems more plausible than the other one about plagiarism.

[-] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

Just saw the plagiarism email post and teah... this is starting to seem fake

[-] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 6 points 2 months ago

You’d hope a professor would understand capitalisation. I know in real life that many don’t though.

[-] apotheotic@beehaw.org 3 points 2 months ago

Eh, its a fairly casual email. Could be that autocorrect capitalised it and they couldn't be fucked to change it.

[-] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 5 points 2 months ago

Ah the heady experience of a virgin clown-sighting. We all remember. Bring on the rainbows, Little Bobby Tables.

[-] Eswe42@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago

First plagiarism and how this? - Get your shit together Faith!

[-] JetpackJackson@feddit.org 1 points 2 months ago

I need the sauce behind this

this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2026
506 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

20254 readers
416 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS