Wow that's even worse than I expected.

Iran is at least letting the US be the one to read the terms of surrender I guess.

Even then they're still pumping money to MSFT

In the 2025 calendar year, OpenAI paid Microsoft $10.59 billion for “Research and development” expenses. We believe this most likely refers to the cost of training OpenAI’s models.

The documents also mention a $6.047 billion charge related to “cost of revenue,” a $527 million charge for sales and marketing, and $42 million in “general and administrative expenses.” In total, OpenAI’s expenses to Microsoft amounted to $17.2 billion.

I'm starting to think this is not all on the up and up.

I think he was verbally tougher but I don't think the outcomes for people in Gaza would have been different if Harris had one.

The 2024 Democratic party was lockstep behind Israel.

She wept into her husband’s chest.

Halabi, a teacher, declined to say how she would vote in November, but said that she is a Republican and always votes.

This is why they get treated that way, because they're going to show up and vote for them anyway.

If the article is about straight dudes, what the hell is that twink doing in the picture?

Maintaining physical exercise seems to be correlated with mental sharpness

I really like the sweater and top together.

wanking gesture

Hell yeah, that's what I'm talking about.
He looks GOOD.

Bring back tunic skirts for the men damn it

That's not a quotation, that's a paraphrase. What did Talarico specifically say that people reacted to? Was it the actual verses? If so, which translation (using a modern-language translation alone could draw that condemnation from some commenters).

It quoted Talarico, at a different event, saying "Politics is just another word for how you treat your neighbors", but that's not the thing they were reacting to.

I'm curious to know specifically what he said that pissed people off, because the details are important when you're popcorning monotheistic textual sectarian religious spats.

Hmm neither article actually gives us the controversial quotation, just gets right to the apologetics.

Don't read the article, upvote if you like the sentiment I guess, but it's a waste of time to read.