659
rule (lemmy.cafe)
submitted 1 week ago by spujb@lemmy.cafe to c/onehundredninetysix
all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 152 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

don’t let the bubba news overwrite the fact that they are using the actually its ephebophilia method of excusing sexual abuse now

e: oh and also the steve banon stufs wowow

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 53 points 1 week ago

How long until they pull out “well the Greeks used to do it”?

[-] baldingpudenda@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago

He's a POWER bottom, the most POWERFUL! everyone knows this.

[-] QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago

"I powarred the most bottoms.. I am the powerest of all the bottoms. They would say, Donald, you are the best bottomer I have ever seen.."

[-] prole 4 points 1 week ago

Actually Mac, you've got it backwards. You see, the power bottom is actually generating the power by doing most of the work.

[-] Fuck_u_spez_@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 week ago

Wait, what happened with Bannon?

[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 41 points 1 week ago

in the latest email releases it’s almost undeniable that Jeffrey Epstein was acting almost as an unofficial advisor to the US president Trump through Bannon

[-] Lojcs@piefed.social 18 points 1 week ago

ephebophilia - Primary adult sexual attraction towards late pubescent or postpubescent adolescents

[-] TotallynotJessica 20 points 1 week ago

aka, pedos trying to pretend it's not as bad when they abuse minors

[-] LuckingFurker 11 points 1 week ago

Exactly, you can try to "well, actually..." your way around it all you like but if you're making that argument you're still a pervert who wants to molest kids

In the sense of being shot 20 vs thirty times, sure. And maybe we should punish them like that. Use a nicer less coarse rope when hanging them.

[-] stray@pawb.social 7 points 1 week ago

The difference is actually important. Pedophilia is a mental disorder which may or may not result in harm to children depending on whether it's diagnosed and treated properly. Ephebophilia not a disorder. Ephebophiles are people who choose to rape young people for fun.

[-] LadyAutumn 14 points 1 week ago

I strongly, strongly dislike the way you are framing pedophilia. All CSA is based around the vulnerability of the victim. Child sexual abusers are aware of what they are doing. No one is driven by such strong compulsion that they must sexually assault someone. It's exactly as evil and wrong no matter the age of their victim. All CSA is wrong. All sexual abuse is wrong.

[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 1 points 6 days ago

just want to say thanks for this sensical, well-worded comment. :)

[-] stray@pawb.social 8 points 1 week ago

Being a pedophile and being an abuser are not the same thing. Many pedophiles are disgusted with themselves, and one of the criteria for diagnosis is a sense of distress arising from inappropriate attraction. Some willingly live full-time in mental health facilities to ensure they have no access to children. It's ableist and harmful to non-offending pedophiles to be conflated with rapists. I firmly believe that it poses an increased risk for CSA as they feel they need to hide their disorder instead of getting help and support.

It's exactly as evil and wrong no matter the age of their victim.

That's kind of my point. Insisting that someone who rapes a 15-year-old is a pedophile comes with the implication that it would have been less bad to rape them at 18.

[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 2 points 6 days ago

the beginning part of the comment is already iffy/barely fine but this paragraph…

…comes with the implication it’s less bad to rape them at 18

no it doesn’t imply that. that’s such a weird leap; it’s a really blatant misrepresentation of what’s actually going on, holy shit. it comes from this habit of centering the aggressor’s identity or “how bad they are” instead of looking at what consent law is actually designed to do.

please do some research on the basic principles behind statutory law and child psychology. statutory age doesn’t exist to rate rapists on some “less bad vs more bad” scale; it exists to protect vulnerable young people.

it’s not “who’s worse,” it’s “does this person need automatic protection?” and the age of consent (depending on your state) is the line where society says that the answer to “does this person need protection” is always yes; not because the victim below that age “counts more,” but because anyone that young can’t legally consent, period.

as an example, if your local age of consent is 18, it doesn’t imply it’s “less bad” for someone 18 to be assaulted. both cases involve victims who deserve care and safety; the difference is that the law gives full, immediate, unequivocal protection to anyone 17 or under based on what we know about human development.

i genuinely hope this is helpful, because this pattern of defining consent law around the aggressor’s identity rather than the safety and protection of the victims is exactly where these misunderstandings come from.

[-] stray@pawb.social 2 points 6 days ago

I don't think I understand what you mean. Legal age of consent and the definition of pedophilia aren't related. If the age of consent were 9, it would still be a disorder to experience primary attraction to people that young. Similarly, if the age were 25, it would not be pedophilia experience primary attraction to 19-year-old people.

You really don't think the Republicans defending him from the label of pedophile aren't motivated by the thinking that raping small children is worse than raping teenagers? People often seem downright enthusiastic about the idea of child abusers being raped and beaten by other violent criminals in prison, who seem to be considered the good guys by comparison.

[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

exactly. “definition of pedophelia” isn’t related to the age of consent at all. the identity of the aggressor doesn’t matter when the victim 100% needs protection in all cases.

people who defend sexual abusers use whatever arguments get them their way. republicans also use whatever response gets them power. and my response is to call them violent and abusive for drawing a line in a space where we know that consent isn’t even an option.

once again, try centering the victims of sexual violence rather than Epstein et al or their primary attractions. primary sexual attraction is not my primary concern; first and foremost i care about preventing the perpetuation of mass sexual violence.

[-] LadyAutumn 4 points 1 week ago

So like I said in my previous comment, no one is driven by such strong compulsion that they must sexually assault someone. Being a pedophile is not a sexual orientation it is literally a desire to commit sexual violence. If someone told me "I am so driven to commit acts of sexual violence against rhe vulnerable that I am voluntarily putting myself into a mental health facility" my first thought would be that I hope they are being involuntarily held.

Pedophilia is not a disability. No i am not being ableist by directly correlating pedophilia with rapists. They are literally obsessed with rape. They see children as a means to an end for their personal sexual gratification. I would react to someone saying they are a pedophile the same way as if someone told me they desperately want to sexually assault someone.

Being a pedophile is not a sexual orientation. It is not a sexuality.

[-] stray@pawb.social 4 points 6 days ago

No one said that pedophilia is a sexual orientation; it's a mental disorder. Sexual orientations are not mental disorders.

Being a pedophile is not synonymous with abusing children. Those suffering from pedophilic disorder are capable of not harming children, just as those without pedophilic disorder are capable of sexually abusing children. The disorder and the act of harm are different things.

You can think of it like drug addiction. The urge to use the drug is there, but you still get to choose whether or not you act on it. Choosing the right thing is a lot easier with professional mental care and community support.

Ideally we want to identify and help every pedophile before they abuse a child, and we can't do that if we conflate them with rapists while they're still innocent.

[-] TotallynotJessica 5 points 1 week ago

As far as I know, pedophilia has not been classified as a mental disorder and is not recognized as such by any major health organization. It's more likely to be a criminology classification like psychopathy.

[-] stray@pawb.social 4 points 1 week ago

Both the DSM-5 and ICD-11 list diagnostic criteria for pedophilic disorder.

Ephebophilia, of course, which they think is okay and fine.

[-] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Wait, isn't Bubba old enough to consent? He seems so old but if Trump puts his mouth on a person Bubba can't be that old.

[-] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 3 points 1 week ago

Sometimes you experiment outside your type

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I dunno. Coulda been when Bubba was little. Fits Krasnov's MO

[-] blazeknave@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

Isn't that just life in Chicago?

[-] deacon@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Came here to express this general sentiment.

That’s our drone striking boy.

Once again. MAGA was right.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

I keep coming back to this and giggling

[-] kittenzrulz123 11 points 1 week ago

He probrally still isnt the throat goat, I feel like his sloppy is low quality

[-] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 week ago

"i'll show you how not gay i am" - donald trump

[-] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Damn, looks like Trump finally took the W 😔

this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2025
659 points (100.0% liked)

196

4844 readers
1627 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS