168
submitted 4 days ago by simple@piefed.social to c/games@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago

It’s a shame. I tried it last night and it has a lot of good ideas and atmosphere, but it was ruined for me by the one thing that ruins every game in this genre, PvP.

I would eat up a purely co-op version of this, even if other humans were replaced with NPCs, but I don’t have the stomach or tolerance for any kind of PvP.

[-] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I feel like the "PvE-only was too boring" argument doesn't even work. Just add a special kind of extra-dangerous enemy that's more alert to your presence and acts more tactically compared to the dumber robots, to add the same tension players would add.

[-] rafoix@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 hours ago

Just add a special kind of extra-dangerous enemy

They usually add more bullet sponges to shooters. That is boring as hell.

[-] tachyon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Maybe Escape from Duckov is more your speed.

[-] DrDickHandler@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

You are a casual gamer. That's all.

[-] rafoix@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 hours ago

Casual gamers = simple easy to pick up phone games

Casual gamer ≠ not wanting to play with toxic children

[-] rozodru@piefed.social 66 points 4 days ago

They must have a decent marketing budget because I've seen A LOT of big streamers playing it. It looked ok. not my cup o tea.

also funny note that the new Call of Duty apparently censors "ARC Raiders" in the in game chat.

[-] Zahille7@lemmy.world 41 points 4 days ago

I fucking hate living in today's world.

You can't even talk about different games while playing certain ones, like what bullshit is that? I really feel like corporations are policing people's lives nowadays, what with Nintendo being shitty to everyone, CoD not letting you talk about certain other games in-game, YouTube and other social media companies censoring any goddamn word that has even the slightest negative connotations (kill, suicide, pedophile, etc.}

Like the world just feels so infantilized and people can't actually be people anymore, like we all need to be told what to do.

And in the end, I think it could all be explained with the rise of fascism literally everywhere right now. This world and existence fuckin sucks.

[-] MirrorGiraffe@piefed.social 17 points 4 days ago

But then we have the indie devs that constantly praise each other, include in-game references to their inspirations or blog about what blast they're having while playing a competitors game.

[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

Those are a few different incentive systems in place. YouTube does what it does to be friendly to advertisers. Call of Duty does what it does because they're too stupid to realize that censoring mention of your competitors actually draws more attention to them. But you're here on Lemmy right now, presumably, because you were fed up with something on reddit and decided to move, and you can do the same with which video games you play.

[-] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 1 points 2 days ago

I played it for a bit and it's really good. I just don't like the genere

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] LettyWhiterock@lemmy.world 35 points 4 days ago

Honestly nothing makes me feel more disconnected with the general gaming populace than the sheer popularity of extraction shooters. Every single one of them looks and sounds unfun. Also they tend to look incredibly generic.

But they're popular so what do I know.

[-] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

They are inherently a sweat fest by their very nature and they appeal to a crowd that enjoys high risk high reward gameplay. Theres nothing wrong with you for not being into it. Not everybody’s dream job is being a fireman and running into burning buildings before lunch either.

But it’s one of those niche genres that scratch an itch that more casual games don’t.

[-] derin@lemmy.beru.co 9 points 3 days ago

As a guy with over 2.5k hours in Hunt, I think it really comes down to people just enjoying different things. I can no longer play standard match based shooters, anymore, as I find the lack of consequence leads me to not caring about the outcome of games.

Incidentally I've also returned to playing Eve, because losing a level 50 hunter you spent a few hours leveling up? That's nothing compared to losing a ship you spent half a year working towards.

Basically I'm addicted to lossy progression in games. Not claiming it's an end-all-be-all mechanic, but damn if it hasn't made me love games again.

Yeah hunt is great, love the atmosphere, the tools, the learning curve and the stupid interactions. Hunt loss is pretty minor though, takes maybe a few alright rounds to get the fun perks and then you can just buy whatever gear.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bytesonbike@discuss.online 5 points 3 days ago

Going on two decades now.

Me with Minecraft.

Me with MMOs.

Me with Dota/LoL and whatever this genre is called.

Me with DayZ/etc survival shooters.

Me with whatever chess auto battlere are.


Granted, games after the popularity winds down and they incorporate it into game genres I do like are neat. I freaking love V Rising.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I played it for 2 hours and enjoyed it thoroughly. But I only ran into a player once, the other times I extracted early. But that one time was enough to sour my mood. I hope they do something to limit the PvP.

[-] justsquigglez@leminal.space 49 points 4 days ago

Can't wait for the news about it inevitably dropping in players. Followed by news of permanent server shutdown within the next 2 years (I'm being extremely generous.)

[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 30 points 4 days ago

To be fair, I told my friends that I thought The Finals would last only 7 months, but it stabilized around a little north of 10k concurrent players, which is probably fewer than the devs were hoping for but enough to keep it going.

[-] barooboodoo@lemmy.zip 15 points 4 days ago

Their handling of The Finals is a big reason I'm going to invest some time and money into Arc Raiders. It's a really beautiful game with amazing sound design. I urge anyone who isn't generally into extraction shooters to give it a shot this weekend, I don't mind dying and losing shit as long as I'm making progress on missions and whatnot.

[-] Codilingus@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 days ago

It's been the only extraction shooter I've ever enjoyed. I'm 100% going to buy it on the 30th, baring they don't pull a u-turn in gameplay last minute. But I have 0 worries with Embark at this point, as I agree they've done an *excellent * job handling The Finals. It's proof GaaS can be great if done correctly.

[-] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I didn't realize it was The Finals people. That alone sells me. What a shockingly fun free game.

[-] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Yeah, unless they move their focus towards more casual gameplay as opposed to the sweatfest that is PvP, the game will only alienate PvE players and be reduced to a swarm of toxic PvP-players.

[-] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

God forbid people enjoying their little coop adventures. I will never understand this community’s hate boner for everything online. Just stick to your single player stuff and be happy. Why dig trenches for something that doesn‘t affect you?

[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

We used to get multiplayer games that weren't dependent on some server that we don't control, and now they've all turned into this. Then we read about all the layoffs that happened because this model is inherently unsustainable, and we have a giant gap in the medium's history of games that we used to be able to play but now cannot because the business made a gamble on a type of game that sometimes becomes a money printer.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Codilingus@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Lemmy's gaming community can honestly be so insufferable, lol. A bunch of gaming boomers upset online games aren't exactly as they were 15+ years ago.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 27 points 4 days ago

What is an extraction shooter? The article did not explain, which it really should have.

[-] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

It's a game based around starting a round that loads you into a map, completing X objectives on that map, and then leaving the map alive to make progress, all while being swarmed by enemies. It's a bit rouge-like in that way.

[-] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Seriously. Let's say the words Extraction Shooter 12 times, and not bother with a quick mention of what the fuck an Extraction Shooter is. Brilliant!

[-] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 2 points 2 days ago

You go on a map with A.I enemies and real people. The goal is to extract components that you want, guns, valubles. You lose everything you found on that run if you don't extract. Other people try the same thing and steal your stuff.

[-] Matty_r@programming.dev 25 points 4 days ago

Basically a bunch of players are dropped into a game map, and normally your objective is to go around and collect as much loot as possible, then after some time or you're ready to leave, you need to find the extraction point - this will save your loot and that run is over.

Some extraction shooters are PvE, and some are PvP, some are both. If you get killed with all your loot before you get to the extraction point you lose it all. It can be pretty stressful, and unbalanced if its PvP where some players play much more then you do therefore have better weapons etc

[-] RabbitMix 5 points 3 days ago

It's a Battle Royale with a mix of PvE and PvE (usually) where you can find places to "extract" and leave with the weapons and gear you found, allowing you to bring those in to future matches, at the risk of losing everything you brought if you are killed.

[-] Codilingus@sh.itjust.works 16 points 4 days ago

Because Embark knows how to make fun ass games. This and The Finals are just both an absolute blast to play with some friends.

[-] neaptide@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

Holy shit this article reeks of AI. “Escape from Duckov” made their list of other extraction shooters, wow.

[-] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago

Not a big surprise. The genre is a niche, the hype has been building for years, and Arc Raiders looks like it scratches that itch many players want right now. Especially disillusioned Tarkov and Hunt Showdown players have high hopes for it. Anyone who‘s into multiplayer FPS knows The Finals is the freshest game in it‘s genre in over a decade so the devs have already proven they can make things at least interesting and fresh.

But again, the genre is a total niche with not much competition as of now. I think that‘s mostly why.

[-] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

And yet the article says Extraction Shooter over and over without mentioning what an Extraction Shooter is. Is this shit intentional, or do most game journalists just start some time after grade school?

[-] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Game journalists gave Pokemon Legends ZA an 8/10 on average. They often have no clue what they‘re writing about.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rafoix@lemmy.zip 15 points 4 days ago

My buddy keeps trying to get me into shooters. Most are boring as hell with almost zero gameplay innovation from games I played 20 years ago.

[-] chilicheeselies@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

Im just waiting for a sequel to battlefield 2142. 2142 was peak fps for me and nothing has come close since.

[-] 0li0li@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago

Planetside 2 did it for me, but nothing since :/

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Truscape 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

The developer behind this game (Embark Studios) is trying to push the genre forward with new gamemodes and approaches to combat design.

Like the Finals has it's own unique gamemode (Cashout) that doesn't really exist anywhere else, and is a ton of fun with the amount of unique encounters you can have throughout the game (with the fully destructible environments with physics allowing you to completely up-end the map layout). There's no "one answer" to solve a problem, and while mechanical aim and good listening for the enemy players will obviously help you, you'll need to change your mindset from the shooter status quo because the objectives and combat can flow quite differently.

Arc Raiders is still in testing, but it's designed to be an entirely 3rd person extraction shooter with an emphasis on sound design and careful maneuvering and movement (make too much noise, you attract a robot or a human's attention. Move too slowly, you may be leaving loot behind or losing out on a good position like the high ground). It even features Uncharted style mantling and climbing, which I absolutely adore.

There is a lot of shooter slop these days, I agree. But these guys are definitely trying to change that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] warbond@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

I've been looking into this recently because The Algorithm wanted me to (I don't always do what The Algorithm wants, but sometimes it's really fucking spot-on so maybe I'm just institutionalized) and I simply don't see why this is really any different from anything else available.

Is it really that much better? Is it the same thing just with better execution? As we've seen time and again, popular doesn't always mean good.

[-] gusgalarnyk@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

It's the best extraction shooter I've played in the genre by like a country mile. Obviously we haven't seen what the full economy looks like or endgame but there isn't a single component that doesn't outclass the competition in my opinion.

Like the immersion is top tier with the sounds, the graphics, the feedback, the movement. It feels really good.

The gameplay is also top notch and does things others in the genre don't do. Namely:

  • variable game length that feels rewarding. I can do a 5-10 min run and get quick and dirty loot with a free load out or I can stay in the map for the full 45 and look for exactly what I want.
  • the items themselves are compelling game play pieces. Like the rare weapons are full on laser rifles and mini missile grenades - they're cool and change how you play, not your power level. Like in Gray Zone Warfare nothing I get feels meaningful different or cool, other than the bullet spongy nature of higher level zones and even that's not super noticeable. I had no reason to want to chase loot in that game.
  • the meta game is sick, probably comparable to Tarkov (although I didn't play enough to actually compare this). Every match I feel like I'm working towards a goal of making the gear floor higher and gear ceiling easier to attain. Again, we need to see what the full game is like but collecting recipes, upgrading my workbenches, and collecting targeted materials feels good.

I'm positive I'll get 3+ months of good fun out of this before I might start mixing other things back in. If the end game is really good I'll be able to make it 5+ months with no content additions I think. The real question for any multiplayer game is can they add material at a fast enough pace to keep it compelling long term. We'll have to see, but they have dozens of levers to pull on compared to a traditional fps or PvE game. New ARC, new bosses, new map mods, new events, new maps, new guns, new gadgets, new subsystems, new modes. Lot of different angles they can add to in parallel.

[-] Damarus@feddit.org 11 points 4 days ago

The release window for Arc Raiders could not be worse. Right between Battlefield 6 and Tarkov 1.0. Also a few weeks ago Arena Breakout Infinite released, which is also a very competent extraction shooter, that I had lots of fun with before Bf6.

This activity is a good sign for Arc Raiders, however it's only a free playtest while the full release will cost 40€. How many of those players enjoying it now will actually cough up this much money for a game in a genre with many failed games before it? Dark and Darker was hugely popular during its last playtest and rapidly declined after the paid (Early Access) release.

I hope that they're successful with Arc Raiders. I think the extraction genre is super interesting and needs more healthy choices that are not Tarkov (which has so many problems of its own).

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2025
168 points (100.0% liked)

Games

42965 readers
1264 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS