521
submitted 14 hours ago by TotallynotJessica to c/onehundredninetysix

top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 1 points 1 hour ago

LLM is a massive burning money pit that doesn’t work as advertised and it’s supposed to save money on skilled labour when?

[-] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 9 points 6 hours ago

In 2025, billions are spend to add AI into everything. In 2030, billions will be spend to remove AI from everything.

[-] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 hours ago

so, it's a multi billion dollar market?

[-] LemmyFeed@lemmy.dbzer0.com 51 points 11 hours ago

That 2nd picture really hits. You have a person sitting on a curb in a defeated posture, invoking images of someone who is down on their luck possibly unable to find work, while behind them is this ad featuring a blank almost soulless face depicting an "employee," who presumably is the reason the curb sitter cannot find work, being praised for not ever needing or wanting work/life balance (you know, things like sleeping or not working)

It's such a bleak and dystopian scene presented in such an average everyday setting.

[-] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 7 points 7 hours ago

Okay... But you don't get to complain about how "no one wants to work anymore".

[-] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 96 points 13 hours ago

i'm sure the "immigrants are taking our jobs" crowd will be as outraged about this right? right?

[-] riwo 1 points 42 minutes ago

i'm sure the "DEI makes everything half assed" crowd will be as outraged about this right? right?

[-] vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 4 hours ago

I know you're just making a joke but we need to just face the facts that it's all based on outright racism. There is no other logically consistent explanation at this point.

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago

Of course not. AI aren't immigrants.

[-] No1@aussie.zone 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Hmmmmm.

What if the AI company is from overeas?

Still durk-da-der!

[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 37 points 13 hours ago

Let me ask my favorite pundit if I should get mad at his boss or the brown people...

[-] iThinkDifferentThanU@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago

that aren't that smart are they?

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 50 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Cyberpunk is one of the most prophetic literary genres ever.

[-] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 35 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Left wing wants solarpunk. Right wing wants cyberpunk. Best we can do is probably Mad Max.

[-] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago

cyberpunk seems to have too many personal freedoms for the (us) right to enjoy

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago

Nonsense! You'll be free to replace your arms for a job, or to travel to the asteroid belt for a job, or to live forever in the computer for a job!

[-] brown567@sh.itjust.works 9 points 8 hours ago

With dorks like musk who like the vibe and completely miss the point working as hard as they can to implement it, I feel like it's somewhat of a self-fulfilling genre

[-] vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 hours ago

Musk isn't missing the point, he just relates more to the super evil mega corp CEOs than the punks. The "point" of cyberpunk doesn't effect him because he's not a worker.

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 hours ago

all Sci fi is about the present not the future.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 9 points 8 hours ago

Cyberpunk traces its roots as far back as the sixties but really cemented itself in the late 70's and early 80's. The fact that their collective vision of the 2020's was so damn close to reality is really damn freaky.

[-] vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 hours ago

There is a somewhat unknown cyberpunk comic called "2020 visions" written in the late 90s that basically perfectly predicts COVID-19.

I read it for the first time during COVID times without knowing what I was getting into and it was pretty damn strange.

[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 75 points 14 hours ago

Followed by "why does no one want to work anymore!"

[-] LNRDrone@sopuli.xyz 61 points 13 hours ago

And then the good old "why is nobody buying our product?"

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 39 points 13 hours ago

I seriously don't understand the end game here....

These people are stuck with this mentality of "labor is one of the biggest expenses a company has so we need to eliminate it" like ok.... and that labor goes and buys a product, if not yours because it's "luxury" then someone else's. The owner of that company spends their money on your luxury products, but they only have money because labor bought from them and now you only have money because of that labor...

No labor, no money for anyone... It makes no sense.

[-] Seleni@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Simple. It’s not only about how much they have, it’s about how much we don’t have.

They also hate that the plebeians can do things they can’t, and they want the ability to do those things themselves, immediately, but without having to put in anything as low-brow as effort or practice.

Up until now, they had to settle for paying lots of money to get those things and keep them for themselves—witness the art gallery scene—but this poses them two problems: they didn’t actually make it, and worse, they had to part with their precious money to get it.

Now they think AI will let them make anything they want, do anything they want, and never have to pay artists or workers, so they can keep even more of their precious money.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 hours ago

I seriously don’t understand the end game here…

CEOs only think in 5, maybe ten year plans, after that they sell out and sip drinks on their yachts. They don't care about what will happen after they nail their bundle.

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago

Bold of you to assume they think 5 years out. I'd be surprised if most of them thought even 5 quarters out.

[-] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 18 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Experts understood this decades ago, and helped to build a system based around everyone having at least some money to spend. The unemployed kept the economy grinding, too. Seems to be forgotten lore now.

[-] birdwing 8 points 12 hours ago

They never count their own labour as a cost.

Maybe it's time we start counting bosses as a labour cost, and employees as a labour gain.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.zip 15 points 13 hours ago

And then “why is no one returning to office”?

[-] dmention7@midwest.social 10 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

And then "why are people shooting ~~us~~ CEOs in the streets in broad daylight?"

Edit for clarification

[-] Smorty 15 points 11 hours ago

god this is so awful.

also its complete falseness

ml models arent there quite yetthey might get there with world models tho


u shud hire humans. most companies which tried to replace jobs with LLMs or whatevr failed, and had to re-hire.

[-] KazuyaDarklight@lemmy.world 31 points 13 hours ago

Wow, straight out of some videogame. Disturbing.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.zip 14 points 13 hours ago

You’d think they would try to be a little more tactful.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 12 points 12 hours ago

Their are aiming this at CEOs, there is no sich think as been too tactless

[-] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 3 points 10 hours ago

Corpo assholes trying to break the AIs out from the Blackwall. Owning the entire world isn’t enough I guess.

[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 29 points 13 hours ago

Ironically I really hoped this image was AI generated

[-] TotallynotJessica 11 points 11 hours ago

Me too, but the company is real and I found a story about their ad campaign in San Francisco. I also didn't see any obvious traces AI in either image, and AI generally isn't good at making text in images.

[-] pivot_root@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago

the company is real

Given the state of LLMs, their security (or lack thereof), hallucinations, and sociopathic responses, I don't suspect that company is going to last long.

All it takes is one of their "AI employees" to cause a colossal fuck-up for a client company, like losing a large sum of money or introducing legal liabilities.

[-] TotallynotJessica 3 points 10 hours ago

Yup. AI will ultimately do more for those using it to maximize worker productivity than those trying to replace labor. There will always be new uses for workers, as unless there's some conspiracy to cull the population, it's a huge resource that causes problems if underutilized.

[-] salacious_coaster@infosec.pub 1 points 9 hours ago

Then they hire "AI cleanup specialist" contractors for a fraction of the cost of a competent full time employee. Everyone loses

[-] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 hours ago

the CEO wins as does NVIDIA, therefore not everyone loses

[-] latenightnoir 28 points 14 hours ago

Yeaah, fuck humans! What good are they, anyway!

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 9 hours ago
[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 12 points 12 hours ago

They’ll need a universal basic income to preserve enough genetic diversity so that the AI-owner elites don’t habsburg the human species to extinction. Neoliberal ideology, however, states that it is immoral for people to be given something for nothing, and granting all of humanity ownership of common wealth, and thus making the basic income a dividend, would set a dangerous precedent that could undermine the actual owners. As such, the humans kept alive in the name of genetic diversity will have to be put to useless makework.

this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2025
521 points (100.0% liked)

196

4372 readers
1686 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS