No, we don't need this at all. businesses need to be fined out of existence for using the ssn, and lenders should do due diligence without some imaginary score.

Exactly who I trust to create a logically organized database of all peoples within the United States. The current administration..

I dont have a problem with that, but what I will object to is the current regime making the replament ID system. 1) there is no way they would design it well or securely, smart people capable of building such a system are usually the first to bounce to another country as they will have the means to do so. 2) it would be too easy for them to lord the new ID over peoples heads (like they are with immigration status now) and impliment a social credit score like China does.

Your correct that SSNs should not be used as IDs, but getting the government to build a modern system for that opens too many avanues for abuse (especially with darth cheeto in charge).

It could be why it's being done, because SSN are being used inappropriately. Potential leaks like this will force banks and other entities to begin making account access more difficult, and this will make it from difficult to next to impossible for a large number of seniors, those who've saved the most and have the biggest accounts, to access it. This would happen even if it was done in a two year controlled manner.

Do this to everyone Trump hired or part of his cohort including him. They are all evil gangster criminals.

Is the answer, "what is treason"?

double checks the community instance

Yes.........prison

Funny, I have an interview invite from DOGE (I considered joining USDS before it became DOGE, had been asked to join by a member back during Obama). Obviously I never did it, but I do keep those emails for historical purposes now haha

I agree that "random server" is a bad choice of words, but do want to add additional information context as the concern isn't necessarily unwarranted. Another qoute from the article:

“I have determined the business need is higher than the security risk associated with this implementation and I accept all risks,” wrote Aram Moghaddassi, who worked at two of Mr. Musk’s companies, X and Neuralink, before becoming Social Security’s chief information officer, in a July 15 memo.

Its also sounds like they did spin up a new database with limited security/oversight to "move" faster. Why that's worrisome is they aren't denying there is a risk or lack of security, they are just saying it's justified.

BUT WONT SOMEONE THINK OF THE SENSATIONALISM?

Forced their way in, were given the keys and explicit orders to take all the data and put it in massive back-door ridden places for themselves and Russia, potato, potahto

Half right. OP's title is massively misleading. Private SSA cloud, the complaint is about where oversight comes from.

You know, at some point you actually do something to put out the fire, you leave, or you burn.

"You don't have a SSN? Must be an illegal"
-ICE

Gee, thanks from the rest of us who already know that.

Accelerationism like that never works. When it all settles, you get extremely mild improvements for a whole lot of hurt.

This is all on purpose. Nothing's going wrong [for them]. The well being of regular people isn't the goal.

The whole world knows by now that these numbers are good for identifying people, and what a giant data privacy hole it is that they even exist.

No, the giant problem is that you can do everything using only SSN.