231

The poll indicates support for the more aggressive position Newsom has taken in standing up to Donald Trump, particularly over a plan by Republicans in Texas to redraw their state's congressional seat map in the hopes of winning more seats in midterm elections next year.

The battle to become the 2028 presidential election candidate will likely set the new direction for the Democratic Party as it struggles with net favorability at what one recent poll showed to be a three-year low. Newsom has not formally announced his candidacy.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 6 points 1 hour ago

Newsom Fetterman 2028. That's sure to fix things right up.

[-] prole 5 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

To everyone complaining: this is the fucking primary. This is when you bring out your leftist candidate that can represent us against literal fascists.

Stop fucking whining and do something about it before it's too late, Newsom wins the primary, and we all have to listen to you whine for another goddamn decade about how Democrats don't represent us.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 4 points 1 hour ago

Until the Democratic Party just ignores primary results they don't like.

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 49 minutes ago

Or they're like sinema and change completely after getting in office

[-] Smoogs@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Canadians are so confused as to the reason Americans hate newsom sort of like how Americans were confused why Canadians hated Trudeau.

[-] rozodru@lemmy.world 13 points 4 hours ago

I swear US Democrats learn absolutely nothing. All you have to do is jingle some keys in their faces and they'll applaud.

This is a guy who wants California Cities to force homeless people to move every 3 days. This is a guy who has threatened to cut funding to cities that don't "crack down" on homeless people.

This is a guy who simply has one of his interns to write funny twitter posts and NOW he's suddenly "presidential material".

And some people honestly wonder how Trump was re-elected.

[-] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

Americans finally knowing when to throw the gloves off and dEcOrUm. You guys had Teddy Roosevelt and he was unabashedly unafraid of the vested interests. And even if there was no Teddy, you guys also mobilised to end the first Gilded Age. You can do it again!

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 8 points 9 hours ago

It's unsurprising Newsom is leading, given all the media coverage he's been given.

Anyway, any poll result now for 2028 is meaningless. A lot's going to happen between now and then, and non-centrist candidates will probably emerge, and possibly do well.

[-] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 11 points 12 hours ago

After reading through the comments here, I’m no longer curious as to how we arrived at where we currently are. We’re an absolute mess! An embarrassingly arrogant and equally ignorant mess.

And while it’s true that our future remains uncertain, after reading through this thread, I’m not sure it’s a good idea that any of us hold on to any length of hope that this disaster will ever right itself again. That is, if it is to be believed that we are a microcosm of a larger collective.

It’s said, that hope is a luxury of those who have a choice. But we had a choice. And what did we do? We slept. We withheld votes in protest. We stayed home. We opted out. However it is presented- We made our choice.

And now here we are. Salivating at the chance to tear one another a new asshole while we marinade in the results of our inability to do the bare minimum to protect a nation’s democracy.

We didn’t just deserve this:

We earned it.

[-] piefood@feddit.online 6 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

We had a choice between one monster, and another (there were other options, but both monsters fought to keep the non-monsters off the ballot). Sure, one monster was a bigger, meaner monster, but the other monster was still pretty damn evil. Maybe next time we should be allowed to pick someone that isn't evil, for a change.

It will never cease to amaze me that people blame the voters for being disgusted with the candidates, rather than blaming the parties for choosing such awful candidates.

[-] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 5 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

It will never cease to amaze me how so many people could expect things to change by doing absolutely nothing.

When given a choice between cancer and a broken bone, you pick the broken bone- every time.

But… now we have cancer- and this isn’t up for debate.

[-] mathemachristian 3 points 4 hours ago

Do nothing??? Look at the DSA getting zohran mamdani into position over shoe-in and sex pest cuomo. Organise with others and dont vote newsom

[-] piefood@feddit.online 4 points 9 hours ago

Who is doing nothing? We're fighting for change, we are pushing for parties that are fighting for the people. We were litteraly in the streets, when the Democrats were out to brunch, while the Democratic leaders were bombing kids, and backing genocides.

Your analogy is flawed, btw. A more apt analogy would be terminal-cancer, or less-severe-terminal-cancer. So... congratulations on supporting the cancer, instead of helping the people who are suffering from cancer.

[-] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 4 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Fighting for a change? Who are you fighting? In what manner do you fight? Give me an example of this fight you’re performing.

Because from where is sit, I’m seeing an awful lot of people that think that withholding a vote because of [insert flavor of the week reason] is somehow going to create change. And protests? They only work if those you’re protesting have empathy and shame. Protests don’t create change. VOTES DO.

By the way- this happens every single election year. Take note on all the change you fought for by doing jack shit.

[-] piefood@feddit.online 1 points 16 minutes ago

Protests, pushing for 3rd parties and politicians that have a record of actually doing something, funding anti-police and military groups, funding homeless-shelters and health-care for people in need.

By the way- this happens every single election year. Take note on all the change you fought for by doing jack shit.

I find this rich coming from some one who is defending the Democrats.

[-] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 hours ago

Speak for your damn self.

[-] MoreFPSmorebetter@lemmy.zip 26 points 18 hours ago

If this is the basket the Democrats put their eggs into I sense 8 years of the couch fucker in our futures. Newsome fucking sucks. At best he panders to progressives with one hand while he signs yet another shady bullshit deal behind closed doors like every single other politician alive with his other.

You think it's just a coincidence that all the money they raised with that benefit concert happened to go into non-profits that his wife runs? You think its been an accident that those effected by the fires haven't seen a penny from that concert?

California has some of the most corrupt and inept leadership it has ever had. More money than ever is being spent on things like homelessness and public transit projects, but strangely both the public transit and homeless problem have only been getting worse.

Fuck Gavin Newsome.

[-] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

Newsom is, and always has been, a slimy neoliberal greaseball. Not only does he not pander to progressives, he is the pinnacle of Democratic Party leftward obstructionism. Newsom serves nobody but Newsom. His current act is nothing more than the latest strategy to bolster his Presidential prospects after openly pandering to the far right failed to gain him any ground.

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 15 hours ago

Idk how he would pander to progressives after mostly vetoing progressive laws in California then going on an anti trans kick once Trump won

[-] kerrigan778 27 points 20 hours ago

The DNC will die before it learns a lesson.

[-] prole 1 points 2 hours ago

FUCKING BRING IN ANOTHER CANDIDATE THEN.

Jesus fuck... Y'all just constantly whine about your options, and when the time comes for the primary, you've got NOTHING.

[-] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 hours ago

Voters will die before they learn the lesson. Beating fascism is more important than getting a candidate who agrees with everything you want.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 43 points 22 hours ago

Yeah, let's put up another California democrat that's too centrist to attract progressives and too California to attract middle America, it worked so well last time...

[-] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 hours ago

If progressives dont vote against fascism they arent progressive

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 15 hours ago

It only makes sense to those who only think hilldog and Harris lost because they were women not because they ran God awful campaigns

[-] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 hours ago

Biden ran an embarrassing campaign, but he had a penis so he won.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 19 hours ago

Great. He's gonna Hilary-up the election again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 15 hours ago

But why?? Because he's acting like trump??

[-] baronvonj@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago

No, because he's mocking Trump. And because he's fighting back in the dirt with redistricting.

[-] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 3 points 12 hours ago
[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 12 hours ago

He's standing up to trump by just going mask off and acting like him

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
231 points (100.0% liked)

politics

25291 readers
3019 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS