832
Any Egyptologists confirm? (piefed.cdn.blahaj.zone)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Brutticus@midwest.social 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I think its interesting that we are also very biased towards long lasting societies, because they leave more stuff for us to study, and literate ones, because they can tell us with their own words what events there were. We still dont have a complete picture of the battle of Cannae, one of the consequential in all of history, whose effects we are still living with. Writing was only invented 4500ish years ago, and humans are as a species are way way older.

Its fucked up to think about Catal Hayuk, or Utsie.

[-] squaresinger@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

It's also interesting how short these time frames actually are. 2000 years are just 80 generations.

All but the most important bullet points of history from that time is wiped out.

And our intuitive understanding "how the past was" is just from maybe 4-5 generations ago.

The past is a vast place and we only ever scratch the very surface of it.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

No one even really knows what their great grandparents were like, unless they were famous or something. I have no idea who my great, great grandfather even was. It stops in 1872

[-] Wrrzag@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago

Aren't great grandparents the parents of your grandparents? I knew them, and a lot of people did know theirs. Mine were nice people.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

What about your great, great grandparents then? Do you know what they were like?

[-] squaresinger@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

True, depends on the age when everyone got kids. But the point of the person you replied to still stands: You know the people you met, you might know one or the other story of the people they met, but then it stops.

One of my great grandparents is still alive. They told me a handful of stories from their parents and grandparents. That's it. There's no history beyond a few birth and marriage certificates from beyond that.

[-] twice_hatch@midwest.social 1 points 2 days ago

And now there is an overwhelming amount of information, as long as someone keeps rotating in fresh hard drives and replacing the dead ones

[-] squaresinger@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Kinda, ish, not really though.

In theory, all that data exists, but huge amounts of it are lost already. There was an indoor pool/waterpark thing that we often went to as kids and it was shut down about 25 years ago.

I tried finding pictures of that, and the only picture I could find was from when it was torn down. There are no (publically available) fotos of that thing being in operation, and 25 years is not a long time.

My wife's grandpa died a while ago and I helped going through his PC to sort what to keep. It was a huge mess and we ended up grabbing a few things that looked relevant, put them onto a hard drive and that on a shelf in my wife's parents' house. And it will likely remain there without anyone looking into it until my wife's parents die, and then it will get tossed out too.

We had long-term shelf-stable data storage for centuries, and still when someone dies we usually throw out their old diaries and photo albums, maybe keeping a handful of pictures. And even if there's a horder in the family who keeps all that, most people end up with dozens or hundreds of descendants over a few generations and one of these descendants ends up with the data. To all others this data is all but lost.

But it's not only that: the number of ancestors you have grows exponentially with each generation you go back. It's easy to keep 4 grandparents straight in mind. 8 great grand parents are also not that hard. 16 great great grandparents that you have likely never met become more difficult. 32 great great grandparents are a lot, and it only gets worse from here. There's only so much mental capacity a human has, so remembering more than just names and dates for everyone a few generations back is all but impossible.

So what we will see in the future is just that there will be more data rotting away until it's thrown out. Cloud services are already starting to go back on their "we store stuff until eternity"-policies.

[-] Uruanna@lemmy.world 163 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Ennigaldi-Nanna lived in the mid 6th c. BCE, she was the daughter of Nabonidus, last king of the Neo-Babylonian empire just before Cyrus steamrolled through the whole place. She was the high priestess of Ur - and the first museum curator in History. Her dad, like many other kings between Sumer and Babylon, went around rebuilding temples that were up to 1500 years old in his time, but he picked up more stuff to bring back home.

Ennigaldi-Nanna built herself a special room with shelves where she lined up objects that were dated between 1400 and 2000 BCE, having them cleaned and restored, and she placed clay tablets next to them to explain what they were, where they came from, who made them. In three languages. In a room open to the public.

It's believed that she was present on sites when those objects were picked up. Some of those were from Ur, the city of her temple - her position as high priestess in that temple had been abandonned for a few hundred years before her temple was restored (because her dad was a big fan of the Moon god Nanna and this was his main temple for over a thousand years), so she may have just needed to look around and pick a shovel and a good brush. Nabonidus is also considered "the first serious archaeologist", antiquarian and antique restorer.

Some of the artifacts from Sumer and Babylon that are most famous today, oldest and best preserved, come from that museum. We found a 2500 year old museum, and we put it in a museum.

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 23 points 4 days ago

Is Ennigalda any relation to Inagadda-Davida?

[-] Danquebec@sh.itjust.works 16 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

No. That song name comes from one band member trying to say "In ~~a garden of life~~ the garden of Eden" while being ~~high~~ drunk as fuck. Then the name stuck.

EDIT: thanks for the correction. While checking, I also saw that he was drunk, not high.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Jikiya@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

Did England put the museum-museum in a museum?

[-] Capybara_mdp@reddthat.com 2 points 3 days ago

Thats amazing! Do you have any sources or papers on this temple? (I would love to share with my teacher friends!)

[-] Uruanna@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Wikipedia is a good start

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ennigaldi-Nanna%27s_museum

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ennigaldi-Nanna

Then the history of Ur in general is relevant. For instance, an item listed as part of the museum is a statue of Shulgi, who was king of Ur around 2100 BCE and rebuilt the very same temple to Nanna. One of his statues (statuette) served as foundation nail for the rebuilding of the temple - Sumerians rebuilding temples involved digging down to the foundation to find the original foundation marker, and starting over leaving a new foundation marker by the new king, and we know Shulgi used a statuette of himself for several temples he rebuilt (they all look the same but we found several across different temples). I don't know what specific Shulgi statue Ennigaldi had, but she might have had, for example, a foundation nail recovered when Nabonidus rebuilt the same temple in the same way.

I don't know off the top of my head where to find a list longer than 3 entries for the items she had, unfortunately, I only find non-specific mentions of tablets, jewelry, carved statues, mace heads, kudurrus. Wikipedia only has a vague few items and says they're in a museum in Iraq, but Ur was one of the major cities and we have a lot of things from there in good condition. Including statues of Shulgi, and of course tablets and jewelry. Obviously the biggest problem is that a bunch of items landed in private collections for a while after Leonard Woolley dug up the museum, and the tablets that Ennigaldi wrote for them were separated from the items themselves, so we know from the display explanations what sort of items she had, but it's a lot harder to trace the exact items themselves - but we do have them between private collections and museums.

I don't know any paper that specifically talks about the museum, beyond Woolley's original notes. A few books talk about it, but that's usually less academic (Wikipedia has some links). This article looks like a good write-up.

In 1925, the Woolleys knew they were excavating a Sumerian site that existed in 500 BCE but Ennigaldi’s museum of much older artifacts filled in major historical gaps about an era that had no previous record.

It's from back when they didn't know how old Sumer really was (the first major Mesopotamian cities were found when people in the late 19th c. were trying to prove that the Bible was real and was the beginning of time, instead they found Sumer and doubled the length of known civilized History), so imagine finding a museum that existed in a period you thought was the beginning of history, and that museum held pieces that were nearly as ancient to them as the museum was to you... In 3000 years, people believing Trump was the beginning of civilization will dig up the Penn Museum and the Louvre and oh boy.

Another good link

[-] Capybara_mdp@reddthat.com 2 points 2 days ago

Thank you!!

[-] TaeKwonDoh@lemmy.world 56 points 4 days ago

And then we have the Epic of Gilgamesh, a 6,000 year old story that reminisces about times long past.

[-] smeenz@lemmy.nz 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

... and Dinosaurs ruled the earth for about 165 million years and even that is only 3% of the time our planet has been around.

Modern man, including the writers of Gilgamesh, are but a fleeting speck on the history of life on this planet.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] hansolo@lemmy.today 36 points 4 days ago

Also crazy is that the thing that brought down the Old Kingdom around 2180 BCE, after nearly a millennia in power, was a megadrought thanks to a climatic change. It took them about 140 years to reboot things into the Middle Kingdom.

[-] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Confirm what, exactly?

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 52 points 4 days ago

I remember a Hardcore History episode where he talks about how in the time of the Assyrian empire, it was known even then that the world was ancient, filled with individual civilisations that saw themselves as the centre of the world and would marvel at the ignorance of being lumped in together with equally self-possessed civilisations by the historians who write of them only in passing with incomplete sources.

I might have a bit of that wrong, I just woke up and it's been almost a decade since I listened to it. But the part that stuck with me was the idea that even to people we see as deeply ancient, they too had an apprehension that human history is no spring chicken.

And yet, compared with the span of time claimed by the ages of the dinosaurs, humanity has barely existed long enough to clear its throat and introduce itself. And in that time we have been imperiled very often.

I was intrigued to hear that the Toba catastrophe hypothesis may be discredited. I enjoy the idea that 200,000 years ago we may have had as few as 10,000 individuals. It must have been a peaceful time...

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 37 points 4 days ago

I've read that their governance was geared towards stability, not growth or disruption. It helps with keeping things going for a long time.

[-] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 34 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I've read that their governance was geared towards stability, not growth or disruption. It helps with keeping things going for a long time.

I'm confused. How could their leaders earn a big enough quarterly bonus to blow on cocaine?

Edit: This might be something modern government models could adapt and use, to everyone's benefit... If we can just crack the cocaine challenges with it.

I think I'm joking, except I can't stop thinking about how a universal basic cocaine subsidy might actually be what is needed to convince a bunch of problematic leaders to retire...

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Fleur_@aussie.zone 25 points 4 days ago

Being in the same place doesn't make it the same civilisation. Cleopatra was more similar to the ancient Greeks than the ancient Egyptians

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 27 points 4 days ago

An unbroken span of time with the same name and identity makes it the same civilization. It isn't like countries stopped being themselves due to an industrial revolution.

[-] Fleur_@aussie.zone 5 points 3 days ago

The ruling class in Egypt spoke Greek in Cleopatra's time

[-] DistrictSIX@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 days ago

That's a very particular and odd view of what a civilisation is. By this logic, there are no inheritors to ancient Egypt at all since even the current inhabitants speak Arabic and not ancient Egyptian. In fact, Ancient Egyptian had already developed into Demotic Egyptian by the time of Cleopatra, and Demotic in itself was heavily influenced by Aramaic and, you guessed it, Greek. It's fairly common for language to develop and change throughout the history of old civilisations, and in that process, be influenced by the major civilisations of the time. Cleopatra speaking Greek doesn't make her not Egyptian, it just means that the Greeks were the dominant civilisation in her region during her lifetime. A thousad years later she'd be speaking Arabic, which still wouldn't make her not Egyptian.

[-] Fleur_@aussie.zone 3 points 3 days ago

Yeah no shit there are no inheritors of ancient Egypt who the fuck nowadays shares Egyptian culture? No one is building pyramids, writing in hiroglyphs or talking the language. You gonna tell me Italy is the roman empire next?

[-] DistrictSIX@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 days ago

I know it's sometimes hard for Aussies to imagine history beyond 300 years back as being relevant to your national identity. But that's just because it'd make you face the fact that your nation is built upon the ruins of a civilisation you feel zero connection to, because of you know, you being colonial settlers and them being the indigenous people you tried (and still try) to eradicate. In Egypt, and indeed in Italy, Greece, Iran, China, India and so on, people don't viscerally hate what came before them wanting to just forget them. They do often feel as the inheritors of those ancient civilizations, and have incorporated them into their own national identity. So yes, Italians do feel like the inheritors to the ancient Romans, just ask an Italian.

[-] Impassionata@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

I know it’s sometimes hard for Aussies to imagine history beyond 300 years back as being relevant to your national identity.

also shut the fuck up you smug fuckhead

[-] Impassionata@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

So yes, Italians do feel like the inheritors to the ancient Romans, just ask an Italian.

That doesn't mean they are. Continuity of geopolitical narrative is mostly stupid. In the era of nationalism (post-Napoleonic France) geopolitical narrative is 100% jingoistic propaganda: those impulses are 100% recuperated by the State.

By this logic, there are no inheritors to ancient Egypt at all since even the current inhabitants speak Arabic and not ancient Egyptian.

That's actually very coherent, or more coherent than the idiotic notion that because people live in the same place, they are connected genetically, culturally, linguistically, or politically.

You're discovering the complexities of comparing geopolitical strata across time and space. Don't disrespect it. Just because you have feelings about an essential "egyptian" storyline doesn't mean those feelings are valid. Shut up. Thanks.

[-] DistrictSIX@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 days ago

Wow, an American backing up the Aussie's settler colonial understanding of national identity. What a shock that a member of the other major anglo settler colonial entity that hates the indigenous people of its land would feel this way. You are the anomaly, the rest of the world doesn't distance itself from the history of the people who have lived there over the years. Understandable that you can't relate though, your whole society has been based on the extermination of those people. So it'd be difficult to claim their history as your own or even feel a positive connection to it. That's not the case for much of the rest of the world though.

[-] Fleur_@aussie.zone 2 points 3 days ago

Ironically you are failing to understand how civilisations change with time and colonisation. The ancient Egyptians were conquered and replaced. You seem to acknowledge that when this happened to native people living in America and Australia this led to a change in civilisation but when it happened in Egypt it didn't.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] ganryuu@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago

I mean, early 19th century Russian nobility spoke more French than Russian, does that mean they suddenly were another civilization?

[-] Fleur_@aussie.zone 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Ehhh my comments was meant to point out that Egypt was far from an "unbroken span of time with the same name and identity." The region was conquered multiple times with numerous fractures and centralisations happening. Cleopatra didn't feel a need to construct a pyramid tomb for herself for example, that culture has died off and been replaced .

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 4 days ago

The oldest recorded song in history starts with "in those ancient times". Tale of Gilgamesh IIRC

[-] Uruanna@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago

A few poems written in Sumerian times, around 2100 BCE, have this starting line or similar (in those far remote times, in those days when heaven and earth were created...). The instructions of Shuruppak, Gilgamesh, Enkidu and the Netherworld (not actually part of the compiled Epic), Enki and Ninmah, the Flood part of the Gilgamesh Epic...

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] foggianism@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago

Want yet another fun fact? All the most famous egyptian pyramids were built in a span of 100 years or so.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

They blew their retirement savings and their heirs couldn't afford to build more!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kromem@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago

Yes. Ramses II's son "found in Thebes" (Khaemweset) was known and recorded for his passion in archeological study and restoration, and has been called the "first Egyptologist."

[-] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 16 points 4 days ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Zink@programming.dev 3 points 3 days ago

The people and/or sentient crabs that study us in thousands of years are going to have WAY crazier things to think about than how ancient the pyramids were to us.

[-] InvalidName2@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago

And time, goes by so slowly. And time can do so much.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2025
832 points (100.0% liked)

History Memes

3299 readers
183 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism, atrocity denial or apologia, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Lemmy.world rules.

Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS