611
Anon predicts the future (sh.itjust.works)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee 143 points 1 month ago

in fact, this green text was made purely from asking chatgpt what ai will look like in 10 years

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 41 points 1 month ago

Unironically the best greentext I ever read was the bottomless pit one written by AI

That was like 3 years ago when generative AI was fun and whimsical

[-] kogasa@programming.dev 30 points 1 month ago

The last time I had fun with LLMs was back when GPT2 was cutting-edge, I fine-tuned GPT2-Medium on Twitch chat logs and it alternates between emote spam, complete incoherence, blatantly unhinged comments, and suspiciously normal ones. The bot is still in use as a toy, specifically because it's deranged and unpredictable. It's like a kaleidoscope for the slice of internet subculture it was trained on, much more fun than a plain flawless mirror.

[-] Sergio@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

much more fun than a plain flawless mirror.

yeah agreed! Back in the day I used to generate text for fun with n-grams and I never went higher than bigrams bc it was boring without those unexpected disfluencies. I thought of it being like an electric guitar, you want it to sound a little raw.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 74 points 1 month ago

This guy bought so many rare monkey tokens. Ai is impressive in some aspects, but it's not nearly as impressive as the marketing that drives the massive amounts of investment into it.

The US economy is doing anything it can to create growth, which is causing investors to create a bubble around AI that is "too big to fail".

[-] fckreddit@lemmy.ml 46 points 1 month ago

"Growth for the sake of growth is the ideology of a cancer cell." - Edward Abbey.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] nailbar@sopuli.xyz 53 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I wonder if personal websites with links to each other, like in the olden days, will start growing in popularity again because of how trust is slowly eroded for anything not in your direct control, and search engines becoming more and more useless 🤔

[-] laranis@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 month ago

But, but, how will we monetize it? How!?

/s

I long for the early 2k internet. So much potential positivity for humanity.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sandflavoured@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago

Same here! This will be the way for me.

[-] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 46 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I think this vastly overestimates the average person's ability to recognise or even care to recognise what is AI and what is not.

You've got all those videos on Facebook which are BLATANTLY AI and the comment section is split between "wow, amazing!" and "it's AI you fucking morons"

The latter will eventually leave the platform and the former will be all that's left.

[-] breecher@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago

And it is not going to take 10 years. It is right around the corner.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] ijedi1234@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 month ago

This has already happened, many years ago. I know this because everyone but me is actually a highly sophisticated robot that resembles a member of my species. I'm onto you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] nebulaone@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Reputation and PGP signatures could be used to verify real human made content. That is, of course, if people actually care, which I think will be rare.

There might be no-ai communities, that require this and are closed down to avoid being scraped for ai training.

Edit: Also AI is already enshittifiying itself, which might get worse if it becomes more widespread than it already is.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

Actually, polls show that most people are not fond of AI-generated content and want it to be labelled or don't want it at all.

As for generating your own entertainment at home, see interactive movies. They did not take off because people don't want to be "working" for their entertainment. That's their time to relax and not make decisions.

All in all, we're not as careless as it may seem.

[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 6 points 1 month ago

A fb group i moderate recently had an AI jammed up it. I ran a poll to keep or disable. "Get rid of it" got more votes than the option "Put a gimp mask on it and whore it out for grapefruit"

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 6 points 1 month ago

Not to mention those interactive movies from the early 90s games that also didn't take off because they were sorely lacking in the game department

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] elvis_depresley@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 month ago

Part of the fun of watching stuff isn't because it "customised to me" it's sharing an experience with the creator(s) and friends, family etc.

I see genAI being used as a tool for creators but not as an automation of content creation.

[-] Lumisal@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I don't think everyone is into that link tho (/j)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] halvar@lemy.lol 19 points 1 month ago

I personally doubt that will happen, since the current models require a lot of data to get better, something we actually don't have. The real danger is what happens once we figure out how to make models without an absurd amount of data.

[-] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago

As well as that, the internet is less reliable since there's a lot more botshit on it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Rossphorus@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

Video evidence is relatively easy to fix, you just need camera ICs to cryptographically sign their outputs. If the image/video is tampered with (or even re-encoded) the signature won't match. As the private key is (hopefully!) stored securely in the hardware IC taking the photo/video, any generated images or videos can't be signed by such a private key.

[-] topherclay@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

So whatever way the camera output is being signed, what's stopping you from signing an altered video with a similar private key and then saying "you can all trust that my video is real because I have the private key for it."

The doubters will have to concede that the video did indeed come from you because it pairs with your key, but why would anyone trust that the key came from the camera step instead of coming from the editing step?

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

You can enter the camera as evidence, and prove that it has been used for other footage. Each camera should have a unique key to be effective.

So if you create a new key, it won't match the one on am existing camera. If you steal the key, then once that's discovered, the camera should generate a new one.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 7 points 1 month ago

Mate, digital cinema uses this encryption /decryption method for KDMs.

The keys are tied into multiple physical hardware ids, many of which (such as player/.projector ) are also married cryptographically. Any deviation along a massive chain and you get no content.

Those playback keys are produced from DKDMs that are insanely tightly controlled. The DKDM production itself even more so.

And that's just to play a movie. This is proven tech, decades old. You're not gonna break it with premiere.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] WILSOOON@programming.dev 14 points 1 month ago

Skynut is coming, in all its smutty glory and we can do nothing about it

[-] racketlauncher831@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 month ago

Photorealistic porns? What's your problem, man? You have realistic AI and this is all you'll have? Just order a silicon doll and put an AI chip into it! Free ~~sex-sla~~ wife!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] yournamehere@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago

email. gmail already summarizes every mail by default in the US. most emails are bot spam. ppl start using ai bots to answer emails. is that the internet of things?

[-] StarlightDust 9 points 1 month ago

That porn had to be trained on real people's bodies who will never see a penny of it. That's laundered revenge porn.

[-] wowwoweowza@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Read classics:

Pride and Prejudice" by Jane Austen, "Moby Dick" by Herman Melville, "The Great Gatsby" by F. Scott Fitzgerald, and "1984" by George Orwell.

Start here. There are thousands.

[-] silasmariner@programming.dev 6 points 1 month ago

Why start there with British and US authors? Why not 100 years of solitude, Disgrace, and dream of red mansions?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

>I have long-since decided to stop watching new media altogether, opting instead for anime that I downloaded and hoarded before 2030, that I can verify was made before generative AI gained popularity

And I'm open to recommendations, I need to stockpile a good 30 years worth of content and I only have like 2 right now

[-] Phoenix3875@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I have a friend that does a rolling schedule on her hoarded old media, which according to her, is sufficient for the rest of her life.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] wanderwisley@lemm.ee 9 points 1 month ago

Reading this made my eye twitch.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] alligalli@feddit.org 8 points 1 month ago

Time to get up and go outside :)

[-] match@pawb.social 8 points 1 month ago

We should get polaroids and analog film again

[-] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago
[-] Interstellar_1 16 points 1 month ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MudMan@fedia.io 7 points 1 month ago

Man, the AI Bros shilling this stuff are really active in 4Chan, apparently.

[-] CPMSP@midwest.social 7 points 1 month ago
[-] Dogyote@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 month ago

Simetimes I think the future will resemble the pre-internet era. AI content will be so easy to create that the zone will be flooded with shit, and only a few reputable sources will be trusted, like when there were only a few TV news channels.

[-] Gork@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 month ago

The last bullet is true even now. Just go into Threads or Bluesky. So many bots and scammers.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2025
611 points (100.0% liked)

Greentext

6907 readers
654 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS