I’ve seen this so much lately. Now anything that resembles high effort must be AI because no way an artist could actually do that on their own. It’s the death of art in more ways than imagined.
Truly the worst part of AI is all of the accusations against real people and their work. Even comments on Lemmy and elsewhere being accused of being AI, often when it seems the user is autistic or a non-native speaker, at least to me. Artists being accused as well. Even outside of accusations, a lot of commissionable artists are providing timelapse of them making the art in whatever program.
Truly the worst part of AI is all of the accusations against real people and their work.
Idk. Being accused of using an AI is an inconvenience. Having your work stolen by AI seems magnitudes "worse"
People have been removed/kicked from contests/subreddits iirc, and that could also mean being graded unfairly, or judged unfairly in a number of ways that could impact them financially if others believe the accusations. I'm not going to make a call on which is worse, but I don't think one is so obviously worse than the other.
Fair enough, though i gotta be honest "kicked from subreddits" sent me. We're talking about people's livilihoods here, not kicked from a social media community.
Social media is how many artists gather a following that earns them a living.
Being kicked out of a large sub reddit can literally bankrupt artists. Depending on circumstances.
Social media IS the single most important avenue and marketplace for an indie artist to make a living.
It's really really hard to over state how fucked over you can become just losing access to only a single large social.
Sure but the original message essentially was "i think people(not specifically artists) have been removed from social media [over being accused of using ai"
It was a theoretical "iirc" and not a specific instance.
So in this theoretical instance of an artist being kicked from a community over being accused of using ai then surely the community leaders would be willing to watch a time lapse of them make art to confirm they are legitimate and remove the ban.
It would be inconvenient and annoying but it's not likely to be the literal worst thing that comes from ai. Inb4 "what if the mods are unreasonable and don't remove the ban!" Well, then the ai accusation is a red herring and that community would've already been under some pretty bad leadership and a ticking time bomb for any number of other reasons.
Gotta interact with your customer base somehow. For artists, it'd likely be the equivalent of getting banned off Ebay, Facebook marketplace, or Amazon.
Why? An artist's livelihood hurt is an artist's livelihood hurt; it doesn't matter if AI capitalists or anti-AI witch hunters are the cause.
Because as we see in this post, the artist could prove themselves. Other artists could time lapse themselves to show they are authentic. Im not saying no harm is being done, but artists could defend themselves.
When an ai steals an artists work and allows people to recreate art in their style, how would they defend themselves? If a voice actors voice is stolen and used for voice over videos without compensation or consent then how will they defend themselves? We're talking about maybe being able to sue someone over it but you have less recourse and the damage is potentially greater.
And I'm also just thinking beyond artists alone. There can be automated highly targeted vishing attacks now which i think is a scary fucking thing.
Or take the Russian invasion of Ukraine where Russia has intentionally bombed civilian buildings to spread fear. Drones and UAVs are being guided by AI and if a country really wanted to, they could train them to target any sign of life, combatant or not.
So imo an artist being falsely accused of using ai it does suck, but they have options. I think having your work directly stolen is worse, and beyond just artists AI scares the living hell out of me. There's a lot of reasons to hate or fear AI. Being falsely accused of AI isn't the literal worst thing that has come from AI in the past 70 years.
Something happened when Photoshop came out and if written accounts are accurate the same when photography came out.
The only real difference is just how deep the misunderstanding and hate of the technology is.
In the past people didn't like it because at the core people don't like change.
But with AI it's gone beyond that, it's political and fueled by ignorance on top. Along with people blaming a tool, for the actions of people.
In the past people blamed the user, the human. Scamming, lying or selling fraudulent products. But now people blame the tool as if the tool it self sells the fraud, steals and claims innocence.
Lemmy is worse than most other places for this as well.
People with just enough tech knowledge to be angry, and artists who frankly are so tech illiterate that even using their own tools strains the limit of their understanding of the topic. Have been the source of more misinformation, misdirected rage and problems on this topic.
There are valid and plenty of reasons for artists to be upset but for every one that iv seen understand the tech, the actual problems around the topic and direct that anger at the correct sources.
I see 50 others directing it at the wrong place acting as an authority when they have no idea what they are talking about and then getting their followers to do the same.
Vtubers have been one of the absolute WORSE examples of this.
I will have to confess, I didn't understood what you said. But I have to point out something:
Lemmy is worse than most other places for this as well.
We can cut the 4 last words of that sentence (. ❛ ᴗ ❛.) /hj
Totally agree. A lot of people are adamantly hell-bent on finding if an image is AI or not. Stuck in Plato's cave for real
I mean, for me that does come from a place of appreciating real work. If this post would've been AI-generated, I would not have cared about it at all. But that they built the whole scene in Blender, that makes it cool.
There are also tons of people commenting under clearly AI generated pictures that they are „photoshopped“. Those are probably the same people that called videos with face filters photoshopped.
the fucking Pikachu blob
I like that the humans swear with their right hands (index finger on our left), but the beasts swear with their left hands (index finger doesn't matter)
pushes glasses up
Link isn't a human.
hume annoyed
Because the beast is sinister.
insisting random shit is AI is a weird way to admit you don't know how to spot AI slop
Well it is becoming harder...
Just zoom in, I still manage to spot many of them on the wild, they all have a thin feeling of dream
AI is getting better. This slop phase is nearly done.
i don't think slop is a technology issue, it's people having dogshit taste
traditional artists have mercifully filtered out the worst of it, but now the floodgates are open
Among other things, Link wearing the wrong outfit should be a dead giveaway it’s more than just an AI upscale/filter.
? the botw outfit is one of the costumes available for link in super smash bros ultimate, though, isn't it?
It's the wrong outfit compared to the original picture:
i hav given up on distinguishing real life images from fake ones, digital ones or still somewhat doable, bt they also continue to become harder to spot...
196
Community Rules
You must post before you leave
Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).
Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.
Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.
Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".
Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.
Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.
Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.
Avoid AI generated content.
Avoid misinformation.
Avoid incomprehensible posts.
No threats or personal attacks.
No spam.
Moderator Guidelines
Moderator Guidelines
- Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
- Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
- When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
- Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
- Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
- Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
- Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
- Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
- Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
- Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
- Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
- Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
- First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
- Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
- No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
- Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
- Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.