1699
speak out now (lemmy.ml)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] icerunner_origin@startrek.website 126 points 1 week ago

Reich calls out the Führer, there's a headline that writes itself.

[-] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 36 points 1 week ago

He's got a very unfortunate surname for someone who is so anti-Trump lol

[-] anton 30 points 1 week ago

It also means rich in german. It funny when he tweets against the rich.

[-] klu9@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

I wonder if his dad was Robert Reich Jr...

[-] runner_g 16 points 1 week ago

His son is Sam Reich, CEO of dropout.

[-] peteyestee@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago

Richy Reich

[-] Grizzlyboy@lemm.ee 106 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Early warning signs of fascism:

1.) Powerful and continuing expressions of nationalism

2.) Disdain for the importance of human rights

3.) Identification of enemies/scapegoats as a unifying cause

4.) The supremacy of the military/avid militarism

5.) Rampant sexism

6.) A controlled mass media

7.) Obsession with national security

8.) Religion and ruling elite tied together

9.) Power of corporations protected

10.) Power of labor suppressed or eliminated

11.) Disdain and suppression of intellectuals and the arts

12.) Obsession with crime and punishment

13.) Rampant cronyism and corruption

14.) Fraudulent elections

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 43 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

so you mean to tell me my country was fascist all along

[-] Venator@lemmy.nz 18 points 1 week ago

It's a sliding scale and it's recently descended into unambiguously facist territory.

Its like diagnosing a disease: just one symptom isn't conclusive, but when you have all the known symptoms you can be pretty sure what it is.

[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

The Democrats were less obvious but still bow down to corporations.

"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power.” — Benito Mussolini.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power.

i'm struggling to think of a single capitalist state i have some knowledge of that doesn't work like this. there are probably a few of them...?

Merger is the key word.

Corporates do have some power, to greater or lesser degrees, in most government systems. But very few have the level of control over writing laws and paying politicians that the USA has.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)

Freedom of the Press still exist

Exhibit A: The journalist that just exposed the government fucked up on OPSEC, and their attempt to shield their communications from official records as mandated by law, via the use of Signal

Not completely fascist, yet.

Then one day, out of nowhere, you'll hear a bunch of helicopters hovering, sirens wailing, your browser says "Unable to connect", calls get dropped, SMS says "undeliverable", phone says "Emergency Only" instead of the carrier name. Then you'll go to the grocerry store and on the way there, you see a bunch of soldiers with a roadblock thing and... it's a checkpoint...

...aaand enjoy! This is the Bad Place (now the actual Bad Place)

The auto-coup will not be televised (not for those within the regime anyways.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

USA was founded by slavers who were the pre-cursors to fascism.

USA was fascist from inception even before fascism.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BreadOven@lemmy.world 55 points 1 week ago
First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—
     Because I was not a socialist.

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—
     Because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
     Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
  • Martin Niemöller

Just in case people don't know the original.

[-] badmin@lemm.ee 34 points 1 week ago

That's not the original.
Hint: any version that doesn't mention "communists" is "filtered".

[-] wieson@feddit.org 37 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Good call, I didn't know that. This is the original

Als die Nazis die Kommunisten holten,
habe ich geschwiegen,
ich war ja kein Kommunist.

Als sie die Sozialdemokraten einsperrten,
habe ich geschwiegen,
ich war ja kein Sozialdemokrat.

Als sie die Gewerkschafter holten,
habe ich geschwiegen,
ich war ja kein Gewerkschafter.

Als sie mich holten,
gab es keinen mehr,
der protestieren konnte.

It's not straight forward to translate, because there is no active verb in English for "to remain silent".

When the Nazis came and took the communists 
I remained silent
Since I wasn't a communist.

When they imprisoned the social democrats 
I remained silent
Since I wasn't a social democrat.

When they took the trade unionists 
I remained silent
Since I wasn't a trade unionist.

When they took me
There was no one left
Who could protest. 
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BreadOven@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Good point. I forgot about the communist part and only copied the first one on wiki due to laziness. Thanks for reminding me.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] kittenzrulz123 52 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

AN INJURY TO ONE IS AN INJURY TO ALL

[-] FundMECFSResearch 19 points 1 week ago
[-] klu9@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 week ago
[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 week ago

Gonna take more than speaking.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

We're past the point of speaking out.

I would like for you to consider why the US constitution outlines free speech in its first amendment, and the right to bear arms in the second. The reason why is not that different than the principal of charity, or the social contract of tolerance. The first amendment outlines and sets speech, language, as the first step in challenging authority. But implicit in that principal, is the idea that governments are precluded from not listening, or not being available to that speech. It is literally in why the US constitution is structured the way it is, in putting limits and restraints on governments, not people.

We have devolved long past the point where free speech is respected by the US government, under any interpretation of the words.

The second, is an enshrining of the right to to the use of violence when the first is no longer being respected.

[-] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.bascul.in 13 points 1 week ago

Trump's implied support for Erdogan is also considered to be one of the reasons why Erdogan's trying this hard to keep himself as the leader even though protests are riling up all around the country. Speak out for us too.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] nick@midwest.social 11 points 1 week ago

He’s warning us not to speak out then telling us to speak out.

[-] kingshrubb@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I mean probably don't speak out if you have a visa or green card at this point in time for safety but otherwise be loud. They can't deport everyone.

[-] arudesalad@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago

He is telling Americans to speak out now before Trump stops them from speaking out

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 13 points 1 week ago

the opposite. he's saying speak now or forever hold your peace (because you'll be dead)

[-] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago

You are incorrect. He's saying that if you use your right to free speech, you CAN be disappeared. Your grasp of the word "can" is tenuous.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Franklin@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago

he's outlining the erosion of rights and telling you to stand up together before there's nothing left to defend

[-] Infynis@midwest.social 8 points 1 week ago

If reporting what the administration is doing makes you wary to exercise your rights, it's not the reporter that's telling you not to speak out

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

i like to speak up in loud bangs

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago

If Trump can do it, then any president can do it. That's the real problem.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

As awful as he is, I think he serves a good example of the opposite being true. It can serve as a warning.

"If we give any President this authority, someone like Donald Trump could use it if they ever got elected."

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 1 week ago

I wasn't aware that "we" were taking it lying down.

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] Philharmonic3@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

We need to disappear this regime.

load more comments
this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
1699 points (100.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

7296 readers
2462 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS