1709
speak out now (lemmy.ml)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] icerunner_origin@startrek.website 126 points 11 months ago

Reich calls out the Führer, there's a headline that writes itself.

[-] Grizzlyboy@lemm.ee 107 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Early warning signs of fascism:

1.) Powerful and continuing expressions of nationalism

2.) Disdain for the importance of human rights

3.) Identification of enemies/scapegoats as a unifying cause

4.) The supremacy of the military/avid militarism

5.) Rampant sexism

6.) A controlled mass media

7.) Obsession with national security

8.) Religion and ruling elite tied together

9.) Power of corporations protected

10.) Power of labor suppressed or eliminated

11.) Disdain and suppression of intellectuals and the arts

12.) Obsession with crime and punishment

13.) Rampant cronyism and corruption

14.) Fraudulent elections

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BreadOven@lemmy.world 55 points 11 months ago
First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—
     Because I was not a socialist.

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—
     Because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
     Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
  • Martin Niemöller

Just in case people don't know the original.

[-] badmin@lemm.ee 34 points 11 months ago

That's not the original.
Hint: any version that doesn't mention "communists" is "filtered".

[-] wieson@feddit.org 37 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Good call, I didn't know that. This is the original

Als die Nazis die Kommunisten holten,
habe ich geschwiegen,
ich war ja kein Kommunist.

Als sie die Sozialdemokraten einsperrten,
habe ich geschwiegen,
ich war ja kein Sozialdemokrat.

Als sie die Gewerkschafter holten,
habe ich geschwiegen,
ich war ja kein Gewerkschafter.

Als sie mich holten,
gab es keinen mehr,
der protestieren konnte.

It's not straight forward to translate, because there is no active verb in English for "to remain silent".

When the Nazis came and took the communists 
I remained silent
Since I wasn't a communist.

When they imprisoned the social democrats 
I remained silent
Since I wasn't a social democrat.

When they took the trade unionists 
I remained silent
Since I wasn't a trade unionist.

When they took me
There was no one left
Who could protest. 
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BreadOven@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Good point. I forgot about the communist part and only copied the first one on wiki due to laziness. Thanks for reminding me.

[-] seeigel@feddit.org 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Which already tells you too much about Wikipedia.

[-] Nalivai@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Wikipedia is not an entity, it's a collective. You, personally, can fix whatever is incorrect there. And some would say, should.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] kittenzrulz123 52 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

AN INJURY TO ONE IS AN INJURY TO ALL

[-] FundMECFSResearch 19 points 11 months ago
[-] klu9@lemmy.ca 18 points 11 months ago
[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 16 points 11 months ago

Gonna take more than speaking.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

We're past the point of speaking out.

I would like for you to consider why the US constitution outlines free speech in its first amendment, and the right to bear arms in the second. The reason why is not that different than the principal of charity, or the social contract of tolerance. The first amendment outlines and sets speech, language, as the first step in challenging authority. But implicit in that principal, is the idea that governments are precluded from not listening, or not being available to that speech. It is literally in why the US constitution is structured the way it is, in putting limits and restraints on governments, not people.

We have devolved long past the point where free speech is respected by the US government, under any interpretation of the words.

The second, is an enshrining of the right to to the use of violence when the first is no longer being respected.

[-] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.bascul.in 13 points 11 months ago

Trump's implied support for Erdogan is also considered to be one of the reasons why Erdogan's trying this hard to keep himself as the leader even though protests are riling up all around the country. Speak out for us too.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] nick@midwest.social 11 points 11 months ago

He’s warning us not to speak out then telling us to speak out.

[-] kingshrubb@lemmy.ml 29 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I mean probably don't speak out if you have a visa or green card at this point in time for safety but otherwise be loud. They can't deport everyone.

[-] arudesalad@sh.itjust.works 18 points 11 months ago

He is telling Americans to speak out now before Trump stops them from speaking out

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 13 points 11 months ago

the opposite. he's saying speak now or forever hold your peace (because you'll be dead)

[-] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 11 months ago

You are incorrect. He's saying that if you use your right to free speech, you CAN be disappeared. Your grasp of the word "can" is tenuous.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Franklin@lemmy.ca 9 points 11 months ago

he's outlining the erosion of rights and telling you to stand up together before there's nothing left to defend

[-] Infynis@midwest.social 8 points 11 months ago

If reporting what the administration is doing makes you wary to exercise your rights, it's not the reporter that's telling you not to speak out

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 11 months ago

If Trump can do it, then any president can do it. That's the real problem.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

As awful as he is, I think he serves a good example of the opposite being true. It can serve as a warning.

"If we give any President this authority, someone like Donald Trump could use it if they ever got elected."

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 11 months ago

I wasn't aware that "we" were taking it lying down.

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] Philharmonic3@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

We need to disappear this regime.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
1709 points (100.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

10988 readers
2507 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS