396

I wonder if you could analyze internet discussions for an effect.

top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

So, I've seen a lot of people who were extremely sharp as PhD students become blunted as soon as 9--5 starts.

A lot of decline among adults can likely be traced back to increased cognitive load during working hours, which chips away at intelligence over time as folks burn out.

With kids it's harder to place, maybe it's walking the tightrope that is modern social interactions?

[-] match@pawb.social 5 points 1 week ago

i think with kids it's less attributable to wokedei and more a total collapse of the educational system mixed with higher and higher stress levels as the world loudly strains around them

[-] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 week ago

Corporations have used social media to colonize and profit from our attention spans, including those of children. Our mental capacity and attention spans are limited, especially children's. When the advertisers have had their fill, how much is left for learning?

[-] curiousPJ@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago

Bored people can now tune into (source of entertainment) instead of learning.

I don't think the capacity for intelligence has dropped significantly, rather we as a society dedicate our time differently.

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

entertainment

Bingo. We have a winner.

Lack of mental lifting. Critical thinking becomes too hard. Why innovate? The country has become fat, dumb and happy.

[-] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

is anyone here talking about the systematic dismantling of public education and starving of teachers and children in terms of learning resources and actual food

also i again have to complain about Idiocracy, the comedy film that suggests intelligent rich people will solve our problems and stupid poor people will doom society, where in reality you have incredibly wealthy and also incurious, unintelligent ghouls hoarding generational wealth, making it a top priority to have tons of children in order to make their 'superior' genes take over.

[-] prole 4 points 1 week ago

I agree. Idiocracy is a funny movie, but that's it. The entire premise of "stupid people make stupid children" is based in eugenics.

[-] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

The fact that teachers need to beg for pencils is disgraceful. Teachers should get paid more and not have to pay for their supplies.

[-] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago

Idiocracy keeps becoming truer and truer every year.

[-] SoupBrick@pawb.social 17 points 1 week ago

Unfortunately, that movie's main message was about eugenics. I am not arguing that anti-intellectualism is not spreading like a cancer, but that movie is not the best thing to reference.

[-] Probius@sopuli.xyz 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I don't think it ever actually promoted eugenics. It just explored the natural consequences of two facts in a comedic way:

  • Intelligence has a hereditary component to it.
  • Stupid people have more kids.

It never tries to push any eugenics-based agenda. It would have if they tried to say that dumb people shouldn't be allowed to have kids, but they never went anywhere near that.

[-] SoupBrick@pawb.social 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[-] Probius@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

If one believes the accuracy of film’s central premise—that the dumb are reproducing at a higher rate than the smart, which will lower the world’s intelligence until idiocy reigns supreme—it’s only natural to want to stop that from happening. From there, it’s not at all that great a leap to begin believing that maybe there should be some kind of policy only allowing intelligent people to reproduce—in other words, sterilize the dumb.

This is just the author asserting their own absurd leaps in logic as the intended message behind the movie, which it clearly isn't.

A 2015 Pew study looked at how many kids that women with postgraduate degrees have given birth to over the past half-century. In 1994, 30 percent of women with a master’s degree or higher were childless, a number that’s since dropped to 22 percent. In 1976, 10 percent of said women had one child, while in 2014 that numbers up to 18 percent; those with two kids rose even more dramatically, from 22 to 35 percent.

The author draws the wrong conclusion from this data. Just because women with degrees are having more kids now than in the past doesn't mean that women without degrees haven't always had more kids than women with degrees. It's very telling that they never bring those numbers up.

[-] SoupBrick@pawb.social 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The issue is the thought that people cannot grow and learn. Regardless of upbringing, anybody can choose to persue knowledge. The horrible state of public education is most likely the root cause, in my opinion. The US has chose not to invest in it's people and now we are seeing the results.

[-] Probius@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

You're absolutely right that access to education can greatly improve intelligence. Critical thinking skills are just that - skills that must be learned. Genetics are just one of countless factors involved in how intelligent someone ends up being.

I saw Idiocracy a while ago, so I can't remember every detail to bring up examples, but I think the characters surrounding the main character did show growth and a willingness to try to learn things. I don't think we see much of an education system in that movie's portrayal of the future either.

It's also worth noting that while your genetics absolutely affects your brain structure and chemistry, parents can pass on stupidity or intelligence to their children in more ways than just genetically. After all, most people learn more from their parents than from anyone else.

[-] SoupBrick@pawb.social 1 points 1 week ago

I would recommend rewatching it. I tried to rewatch it with a friend and didn't get more than 30mins in before they were done.

[-] Probius@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

What stood out to you as particularly bad on your rewatch?

[-] SoupBrick@pawb.social 1 points 1 week ago

How heavily it leaned into eugenics as the "root problem".

[-] SnotFlickerman 4 points 1 week ago

Yeah as the smart child of two dumbfuck parents who can barely read please stop repeating this dumb shit.

Two smart people don't always make a smart baby. Two dumb people don't always make a dumb baby.

It is eugenics.

[-] Probius@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

If you automatically assumed that intelligence having a hereditary component to it meant that I was trying to say that all dumb people's children were also dumb 100% of the time, you might not be as smart as you think.

[-] capital_sniff@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

It is simpler than all that. Elite parents send their children to elite schools and universities. Their children then learn how the world works and are equipped with the skills to engage with the people running things.

The lower classes do not value education in this fashion. Their children do not have parents at home who understand how the world works or how our society is organized. Even if those children are smart or gifted they have no idea how to learn the skills they need or how to properly use their gifted abilities.

[-] General_Effort@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Wealth has a hereditary component.

[-] Anissem@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

Shit. I know shit's bad right now, with all that starving bullshit, and the dust storms, and we are running out of french fries and burrito coverings. But I got a solution.

[-] RBWells@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago

I can believe it. Physical inactivity, less creative play for children, distraction all the time.

Mind you, in some ways I don't buy it - the two of my kids who were very academically motivated both learned much more in school than I did (I went during a conservative time when the schools were doing "back to basics" which didn't help, but simple research before the Internet was so difficult that I didn't have access to as much as they did, it took more effort to learn less) and those two are whip-smart. So I think the potential to be smart is higher now. Also maybe we have included more people in the measurements now that it's easier to get the data.

But physical inactivity does harm brain health, plastic probably does, the dumbing down again in the schools here (is this some 40-50 year cycle?) certainly does. I do, like @drascus@sh.itjust.works work at maintaining my thinking by trying to learn new things, not just get good at what I am good at already; and do a lot to maintain physical health, meditate, and try to guard my sleep as much as possible within the context of a normal life.

[-] EaterOfLentils@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

It's not, it's not having to do the math or the remembering. The brain is a muscle, when you have your phone doing all the hard work it doesn't need to be as buff. LLMs will worsen this problem even more. Microplastics? Maybe single digit consequences.

[-] EaterOfLentils@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Idk anecdotal but I do math and programming every day and I still feel like I'm getting progressively dumber.

[-] upandatom@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Lol, you aren't wrong there.

You (and everyone) are getting dumber because as convenience increases, intelligence decreases.

[-] drascus@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 week ago

Its a lot of work but you have to constantly push. I am 42, but I read a few dozen books a year, I'm constantly learning new languages, new instruments, I write short stories for fun, do creative projects, and meditate. I still feel really sharp but I'm throwing down everyday.

[-] Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Neat! Tell us more!

[-] TheSealStartedIt@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago

You sound like you're consumed by your own ambition. Hope you're happy though.

[-] drascus@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

Not really I mostly do it for entertainment and because I like to see what I can do

[-] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Sounds like he's living his best life to me.

[-] conicalscientist@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

Tech companies hire psychologists to behavior modify us to be engagement zombies. That alone must have done a number on intelligence.

[-] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

One, we’ve off loaded much of our critical thinking and researching skills to Google et al. This will only get worse as we develop stronger AI assistants that perform a majority of the “thinking” tasks. Technology frees the mind in some ways and reduces the need for certain functions. I read an article probably 10 years ago about how Japanese struggle to write because cell phones and computers have taken over much of that skill.

[-] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

To be fair, the idea that writing has to be this perfect penmanship that will be readable in 1000 years is silly. Write things down in a good enough style for the task at hand.

[-] match@pawb.social 14 points 1 week ago

This article seems to be only looking at America based off the sources that I can access without a paywall

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

I fucking believe it.

[-] SnotFlickerman 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

There's also no real proof that high intelligence is actually a productive evolutionary trait.

We're juuuuuuuuust smart enough to grow like a cancerous parasite and are getting close to killing our sickly host organism.

[-] match@pawb.social 3 points 1 week ago

i'm optimistic enough to believe we'll be like

feigenbaum graph of rabbit population where it fluctuates between two numbers, then four numbers, then a fuckload of random numbers

[-] Keener@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago

What does Chat Gpt say about this?

[-] vividspecter@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago

The FT source seems to be behind a paywall, and this article seems to be jumping between a bunch of possibly unrelated issues (focusing on young adult cognitive decline but looking at whole population reading rates and numeracy ability).

[-] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Summary The article describes a decline in human intelligence, particularly among young people. The decline is attributed to reducedk reading habits and the negative impact of excessive screen time on cognitive abilities.

[-] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 week ago

Not really surprising given how all the social information delivery services are designed for a constant wall of short dopamine hits, and the platforms used to access the information are designed so no actual skill is needed to be able to access the information delivery services.

You give a rat a button that's tied into their brain's pleasure center, the rat will push the button until they die.

All computer-tech needs to be made more open. Not just from an observational standpoint, but the act of making disparate systems work together requires learning and knowledge beyond push button, receive good feels. Megacorp one-stop-shop software/hardware platforms need to be broken up. Both from a walled garden echo chamber perspective, and from a user-use perspective. When a company controls the entire experience, it is too easy to ensure their user is always engaging with their products and spending money/time. Making that company's life harder, makes the technology better for humanity.

Algorithms optimized for dopamine hits must be banned. As soon as our machines became revenue generators tuned for consumption, it was game over. Older systems, one used to have to learn at least basic things to accomplish a goal, which promoted the act of learning in general.

Basic hardware/software interaction and learning were useful side-effects of personal compute from the 1970s-early aughts. One was forced to occasionally open or fix hardware, one was forced to understand how the software worked. One ended up with basic understanding and approachability of the machines one used. Devices today are just expensive consumption toys with zero knowledge needed to consume. When they malfunction, the user has no reason or encouragement to attempt to fix them, as they can't see why the device ceased to work.

Big Tech has run amok too long. Governments are barely regulating them. We humans just gotta start saying no.

[-] MiDaBa@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

I can't help but think how much science fiction had stories where a civilization created machines to make their lives easier until there was no one left who knew how the machines worked or anyone who could fix them.

Those stories always seemed so far away yet here we are at the beginning with LLMs and machine learning.

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

I wouldn't worry about it .... it wasn't that high to begin with

I always remind my friends when we have political debates about so many things ... we aren't that many steps away from the cave we emerged from 100,000 years ago

[-] europeanfan122@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

Honestly, I don’t think it is that surprising. Sadly.

[-] chocosoldier 1 points 1 week ago
this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
396 points (100.0% liked)

News

27971 readers
3816 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS