1155
Let's be honest: If Epstein was still alive and in prison, he would get a pardon from Trump
And an appointment to head the children and families administration.
He’d be tasked with redeveloping Trumpland aka Gaza
load more comments
(2 replies)
No wrongdoing by Trump has been alleged.
BECAUSE HE SETTLED THE CIVIL SUIT, A TACIT ADMISSION THAT THEY RAPED A THIRTEEN-YEAR-OLD TOGETHER.
I wish the media would just be straight with us. Obligatory "Fuck Reagan".
Strong Cato the Elder vibes.
Trumpage must be destroyed.
load more comments
(2 replies)
"No wrongdoing by Trump has been alleged."
FFS
I am alleging it now and have alleged it for years: Donald J Trump joined convicted pedophile and sexual abuser Jeffery Epstein in raping an underage girl.
raping an underage girl
This is libelous - how dare you imply it was only one?
load more comments
(2 replies)
Why is this a surprise? It's undisputed that trump knew Epstein and hung out with him. He even raped a girl who was also "hanging around" Epstein for lack of a better word.
For anyone paying attention, it’s no surprise. To the people who blindly follow him, though…well, they’ll probably never hear about this or just brush it off as some liberal shadow government conspiracy against him.
His supporters have no trouble making the transition from "it didn't happen" to "it wasn't a big deal".
load more comments
(1 replies)
It's a bit surprising he didn't have them censor all references to him before releasing the files. I'm surprised any time this administration doesn't do the most corrupt and evil thing possible.
Fair. But they’ve already “so what if I did?” whitewashed his association with Epstein already, so releasing the passenger log seems like a non-event to me.
It’s a bit surprising he didn’t have them censor all references to him before releasing the files.
Why even bother? He could rape a baby and then eat it in front of its mother and his supporters would keep supporting him.
Donald Trump praised the owner of a sex yacht when he delivered a speech to the Boy Scouts.
He mentioned the owner liked young girls.
You can't make this stuff up.
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/trump-boy-scout-jamboree-speech.html
edit. This was not Epstien, it was another pedophile pal of Trump.
That article doesn't mention Epstein?
Silly me. I should have known Trump knew several people with sex yachts.
He's a sex yacht connoisseur.
I partially think he became so miserable and politically focused because his dick stopped working.
Yeah it's mostly about some real estate developer called William Levitt, and that creepy bit about "oh you know what they did on that yacht" (paraphrased).
load more comments
(1 replies)
Ahhh so that's why he went apeshit on zelenskyy today. Gotta refresh those headlines.
he needs a distraction from the epstein stuff, by going apeshit on zelenksy meetings.
Anyone with skill to do a basic Google search can easily see he's a kiddy diddler, no surprise here.
Dude's an undisguised daughter diddler, so the kiddie part goes without saying
Noooo. No no no. He was inspecting the teen beauty pageant when he walked into the dressing room full of naked minors. You don't understand. When you're famous, they let you do it!
Anyway, those trans people sure are bad, huh?
Unless they release verifiably unredacted/unedited documents (and I'm not sure whether/if verifably unredacted/unedited documents are possible in this circumstance) I'm not going to believe they aren't holding things back out of self preservation anyhow.
The worst possible time for anything like this to be released is during the Trump admin, because now I have to apply an extra layer of skepticism.
I don't even have to go to a conservative sub to know they are or will handwave away his presence on the flight logs, and I know nothing worse is going to be released about Trump or any Trump ally, so what's even the point aside from a witch hunt for all Trump's enemies who somehow will be on the list?
To be clear, I'm sure that Democrats and a disappointingly long list of non-politicians are on that list too, and they should all see the light of day.
They are releasing it now so the base forgets about it in two to four years.
Look at them overachieving when they only need to worry about memories like goldfish.
Well, also the flight logs alone doesn't mean much. It's certainly suspicious, but it's not damning. There was more than one reason to associate with Epstein.
You need more than just flight logs. The suspect would have to say something about "he likes them young, like me" or something similar.
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
Seven flights—Trump’s past ties to Epstein deserve deeper scrutiny.
🐱🐱🐱
For a second there I was thinking about the circumstances surrounding Ivana Trump's mysterious staircase death.
Isn’t it in a book, that trump shoved her down the stairs? Or maybe I’m confusing that with when he just beat her. IDK
I don't know why you think that.
It's not like the girl who was raped by Prince Andrew was recruited by Epstein at Mar-a-Lago or anything, right?
load more comments
(1 replies)
TRUMP KILLED EPSTEIN CONFIRMED!
So? You think this will change anything? Just add it to the pile of shit this cheddar-faced fuck has been involved with. It's not like there's a higher authority that can do anything about it. I feel like it's still not setting in for some people just where we are in this collapse. It's over, guys. There is only 1 path forward.
Le guillotine du fromage ?
Their heads aren't gonna fall off in any other way.
My greataxe is very sad about this erasure
Donald Trump's name appears in Jeffrey Epstein's recently released flight logs seven times
Wow, committed rape at least seven times
Again, I often wonder how much of our current chaos is linked to Epstein lol.
Epstein didn't create the demand for sex trafficking and grooming minors. he "just" exploited it.
Is he a monster? absolutely.
But he didn't create the demand, and the people creating this chaos? they're his clients. After Epstein got caught.... somebody else became the one to provide the service. because there's plenty of monsters wanting to fill that role.
I am implying that powerful people are attempting to cover themselves.
load more comments
(2 replies)
It's one thing for it to be assumed knowledge. But having proof is... Gross.
Jeffrey Epstein is pretty much a mutually assured destruction for many powerful people. I don't expect this to lead anywhere really.
It'll be filed away next to the Panama papers and why JFK was killed.
It's a brag, he liked the guy.
What a strange universe we live in. The old US: pushing surveillance and police laws to fight terrorism, drug dealers, and pedophiles. The new US: has a president who is of open to terrorism by supporting far right groups and storming the capitol, has a billionaire on his side who really seems to be on some psychoactive substances, and now this.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Well, yeah. He's a rapist. Epstein ran the Disneyworld equivalent of rape attractions. If you're good at football, you go to the Superbowl. If you're good at violence, you go to prison. Trump is good at rape. Of course Trump went to Rapeworld.
He WaS eXpOsInG tHe DeEp StaTe! - Idiot cult members
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
1155 points (100.0% liked)
News
29006 readers
3379 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS