253

Nancy Mace repeatedly shouts anti-trans slur in House hearing: 'I don't really care‘ (www.independent.co.uk)

submitted 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

39 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Summary

During a House Oversight Committee hearing, Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) repeatedly shouted an anti-trans slur despite objections from Democratic Rep. Gerald Connolly.

She defended her remarks by attacking transgender rights and dismissing criticism.

The outburst drew condemnation from LGBTQ+ advocates and political figures, highlighting her shift from previously supporting LGBTQ+ rights to embracing anti-trans rhetoric.

Mace has used the slur in past statements and introduced legislation restricting transgender rights.

all 40 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] Red_October@lemmy.world 5 points 53 minutes ago

The actual stripping of protections, the laws they are or will pass, those are bad enough already, but sometimes it feels like the worst part is just how brave these bigot shitfuckers have become now that their pet nazi is in power. They don't even have the decency to be afraid to fly their hate flag anymore. They were always shitty people, but at least they used to feel like the country at large would reject them for expressing their true feelings, hence all the pushback against "Cancel Culture." Now, though, they're not even afraid of ostriziation, much less anything more substantial.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 31 minutes ago

Some future documentarian's job just got easier.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 10 points 2 hours ago

What a vile human.

[-] SpitefulSprite@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Shouldn't she be hiding in a bathroom somewhere, faking injuries while trying to inspect other people's genitals?

[-] SayJess 2 points 2 hours ago

Can’t she, like, shut the fuck up? I wish our paths were to cross.

[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 47 points 6 hours ago

I hope she chokes on her vomit in her sleep.

[-] tenchiken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 6 hours ago

Realistically, I'd be happy for her to choke on pretty much anyone's vomit. Extra points for creativity.

[-] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

I volunteer. I'll eat some weird shit

[-] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 4 hours ago

A whole bag of Skittles please, so she can taste the rainbow

[-] SayJess 2 points 2 hours ago

You, I like.

[-] ploot 123 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

This is a government of the absolute worst people.

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 28 points 6 hours ago

For the absolute worst. The votes were not rigged.

[-] meep_launcher@lemm.ee 14 points 6 hours ago

We're not going to take this lying down

The votes were not rigged, more reason for us to be ready.

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 hours ago

Gross. You are become them. Classic American - apply a bit of stress and you cry Guns!

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 5 points 2 hours ago

When someone with guns is coming for me, what do you suggest I should do? Sweet reason? Aikido?

If you don't understand the situation, don't judge. There's a big difference between persecution and resisting persecution.

[-] meep_launcher@lemm.ee 33 points 6 hours ago

Before this year, I was absolutely anti-gun. I'm a teacher, and it chills me that every time I enter a classroom I think "how the hell am I going to get these kids out of here if shit goes down". That's how I start my Monday's.

Owning a gun at home is statistically more dangerous to you or someone you love than to an intruder.

Most school shooters are taken down by unarmed teachers who work together.

But we aren't facing intruders or school shooters. We are facing the proud boys, Jan6ers, and now the federal government. I normally don't believe in violence and weapons either, but the context has changed and now we cannot rely on promises of public officials to keep us safe. We cannot rely on the police to keep us safe (as if we could before). We cannot rely on any market force to keep us safe.

Only we can keep us safe. This shit is getting real, and for those of us who are most likely staring down the barrel of a fascists gun, we can't just let that happen.

I hate that this is the reality.

I should never have to consider these things.

But in America, every conservative and their mom is carrying, and we in the cities have been complacent. Obviously you are not from America. You don't understand the sheer amount of guns here. Sadly it's creating a feedback loop and to sit unarmed is to be a sitting duck in a civil war/ genocide situation.

The time for the idealism of pacifism is done. If you are neutral you are on the side of the oppressor.

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I was a complete pacifist for a couple decades. Now, I'm a believer in peace through being a hard target. You cannot rely on the basic human decency of sociopaths to save you. You need to deter their aggression by making it more costly and risky.

[-] orgrinrt@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago

I’d think it this way: Get the training anyway, hold off buying if that’s morally (and understandably so) difficult.

If shit hits the fan before you get one and/or it’s otherwise too late, there’ll be chances of obtaining one in the middle of the shitstorm one way or another. Maybe someone friendly has one, but never got around to proper training? Good thing you did. You can help out and try your best to utilise it as morally but also as professionally and efficiently as you can.

Slightly more long term, you can assist training others, if using one on live targets still feels objectionable (and rightly so!) to you.

Learning the craft and proper handling will not go to waste, if it starts looking even worse than it does now.

It can be good, too, to help others use the things more safely and otherwise properly. May save lives. And you need not take any, not in defense or otherwise, if that’s important to you.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 20 points 6 hours ago

Fuck off bootlicker.

[-] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 66 points 8 hours ago

Bigoted bitch

[-] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 8 hours ago

How come the reporting is censoring the word?

[-] Hegar@fedia.io 80 points 8 hours ago

Hate speech is censored to avoid normalizing language intended to encourage violence against the disempowered.

[-] Lysergid@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

It makes no sense. How people know the word that should not be normalized? I’m non-native speaker and after all blah blah in this thread I still have no idea what is the word. So if someone says it, I won’t even know I should call out that person. Don’t we normalize using slurs by softening reporting? If slur censored why would bigots stop using it if they are not properly shamed? All it does is just hiding issue from media with no effect IRL. IRL, US elected bigot

[-] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 hours ago

Yeah but you could report without reporting the word if that is the case. You could keep the fact “the slur has been used” yet they go the extra mile to put it and censored it it. The reporting should just say the fact that a representative used a discriminatory language. I agree with you that we are on for 4 years of hyper normalization https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/HyperNormalisation

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 10 points 8 hours ago

Right, I mean what the fuck is a trans slur?

[-] tiefling 22 points 8 hours ago

Most likely tr**ny

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 3 points 2 hours ago

That used to be the word I used for the tranmission of my car. Not any more. Bigots spoil everything.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

[removed by mod]

[-] Hegar@fedia.io 32 points 7 hours ago

Hate speech is intended to encourage violence and dehumanize others. Censoring the word helps build the social taboo that discourages the use of hate speech and helps isolate people who insist on using it.

Adults take responsibility for the effect their words and actions have on the world.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 13 points 7 hours ago

No censoring word is for cowards and assholes. Same as banning books. Stop censoring words were not children and no one hear is encouraging violence. Just trying to get the full picture. Just like I will call that GOP member who used the slur a fucking cunt.

[-] ada 27 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Unless you’re trans, that isn’t your call to make. You don’t get to decide that it’s ok for people other than yourself to be exposed to slurs. Stay in your own lane.

[-] Azzu@lemm.ee 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

But I'm just sitting here, genuinely wondering what the slur is she used, because I have no idea. I'm not well versed in trans slurs. Idk, news reporting should at least give me some way to find out... Like a spoiler tag to click on. Just... something.

[-] Majorllama@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

You're wasting your time. I got banned from somewhere else earlier for talking about this. They are so unbelievably sensitive that you can't even type out a word in a conversation about what words count as a slur without them taking that very discussion as a slur. Zero thought from them as to how that might become a problem down the line.

They don't see any difference in saying a word while discussing the word vs using the word directed at someone with malice. They are incapable of understanding any nuance in language.

[-] SCmSTR 3 points 2 hours ago

Grow up.

[-] ProIsh@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

The internet is amazing. You see someone with their light coming on and showing growth and then you also see this guy in the same post.

[-] Timmy_Jizz_Tits@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

We're* and here*, child.

[-] SatanClaus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 hours ago

Just like we can't say Voldemort right? I dunno in reporting they should report what is said. Reporters should be asking. "What do you have an issue with. Diversity. Inclusion. Or equity? Don't be shy get specific for me!" But they are all billionaires whores.

[-] tiefling 7 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

As an exercise to the reader, the above post was exercising the slur liberally in an attempt to claim it's "barely an insult"

Mods seem to think otherwise :)

[-] niketunic@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

damn. i don’t know much about her other than she’s been pretty vocal about UAP transparency. sucks that she’s an asshole too.

[-] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 1 points 12 minutes ago

I bet she has a nice cock.

this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025

253 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19776 readers

2453 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News